Comparing flexibility-based measures during different disruptions: evidence from maritime supply chains

Sara Rogerson, Martin Svanberg, Ceren Altuntas Vural, Sönke von Wieding, Johan Woxenius
{"title":"Comparing flexibility-based measures during different disruptions: evidence from maritime supply chains","authors":"Sara Rogerson, Martin Svanberg, Ceren Altuntas Vural, Sönke von Wieding, Johan Woxenius","doi":"10.1108/ijpdlm-02-2023-0075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Severe disruptions to maritime supply chains, including port closures, congestion and shortages in shipping capacity, have occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper’s purpose is to explore flexibility-based countermeasures that enable actors in maritime supply chains to mitigate the effects of disruptions with different characteristics.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with shipping lines, shippers, forwarders and ports. Data on the COVID-19 pandemic's effects and countermeasures were collected and compared with data regarding the 2016–2017 Gothenburg port conflict.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Spatial, capacity, service and temporal flexibility emerged as the primary countermeasures, whilst important characteristics of disruptions were geographical spread, duration, uncertainty, criticality, the element of surprise and intensity. Spatial flexibility was exercised in both disruptions by switching to alternative ports. During the COVID-19 pandemic, ensuring capacity flexibility included first removing and then adding vessels. Shipping lines exercising service flexibility prioritised certain cargo, which made the spot market uncertain and reduced flexibility for forwarders, importers and exporters that changed carriers or traffic modes. Experience with disruptions meant less surprise and better preparation for spatial flexibility.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Understanding how actors in maritime supply chains exercise flexibility-based countermeasures amid disruptions with different characteristics can support preparedness for coming disruptions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Comparing flexibility-based measures in a pandemic versus port conflict provides insights into the important characteristics of disruptions and the relevance of mitigation strategies. The resilience of maritime supply chains, although underexamined compared with manufacturing supply chains, is essential for maintaining global supply chain flows.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":14251,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpdlm-02-2023-0075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Severe disruptions to maritime supply chains, including port closures, congestion and shortages in shipping capacity, have occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper’s purpose is to explore flexibility-based countermeasures that enable actors in maritime supply chains to mitigate the effects of disruptions with different characteristics.

Design/methodology/approach

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with shipping lines, shippers, forwarders and ports. Data on the COVID-19 pandemic's effects and countermeasures were collected and compared with data regarding the 2016–2017 Gothenburg port conflict.

Findings

Spatial, capacity, service and temporal flexibility emerged as the primary countermeasures, whilst important characteristics of disruptions were geographical spread, duration, uncertainty, criticality, the element of surprise and intensity. Spatial flexibility was exercised in both disruptions by switching to alternative ports. During the COVID-19 pandemic, ensuring capacity flexibility included first removing and then adding vessels. Shipping lines exercising service flexibility prioritised certain cargo, which made the spot market uncertain and reduced flexibility for forwarders, importers and exporters that changed carriers or traffic modes. Experience with disruptions meant less surprise and better preparation for spatial flexibility.

Practical implications

Understanding how actors in maritime supply chains exercise flexibility-based countermeasures amid disruptions with different characteristics can support preparedness for coming disruptions.

Originality/value

Comparing flexibility-based measures in a pandemic versus port conflict provides insights into the important characteristics of disruptions and the relevance of mitigation strategies. The resilience of maritime supply chains, although underexamined compared with manufacturing supply chains, is essential for maintaining global supply chain flows.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较不同中断期间基于灵活性的措施:来自海运供应链的证据
目的在 COVID-19 大流行期间,海运供应链受到严重破坏,包括港口关闭、拥堵和航运能力短缺。本文旨在探讨基于灵活性的应对措施,使海运供应链中的参与者能够减轻具有不同特征的中断所造成的影响。设计/方法/途径对航运公司、托运人、货运代理和港口进行了半结构化访谈。收集了 COVID-19 大流行病的影响和应对措施数据,并与 2016-2017 年哥德堡港口冲突的相关数据进行了比较。研究结果空间、能力、服务和时间灵活性成为主要应对措施,而中断的重要特征是地域分布、持续时间、不确定性、关键性、意外因素和强度。在两次中断事件中,都通过改用其他港口实现了空间灵活性。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,确保运力的灵活性包括先撤走船只,然后再增加船只。行使服务灵活性的航运公司优先考虑某些货物,这使得现货市场变得不确定,降低了货代公司、进口商和出口商更换承运商或运输模式的灵活性。原创性/价值比较大流行病和港口冲突中基于灵活性的措施,有助于深入了解中断的重要特征和缓解策略的相关性。虽然与制造业供应链相比,对海运供应链的复原力研究不足,但它对维持全球供应链流动至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.40%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: IJPDLM seeks strategically focused, theoretically grounded, empirical and conceptual, quantitative and qualitative, rigorous and relevant, original research studies in logistics, physical distribution and supply chain management operations and associated strategic issues. Quantitatively oriented mathematical and modelling research papers are not suitable for IJPDLM. Desired topics include, but are not limited to: Customer service strategy Omni-channel and multi-channel distribution innovations Order processing and inventory management Implementation of supply chain processes Information and communication technology Sourcing and procurement Risk management and security Personnel recruitment and training Sustainability and environmental Collaboration and integration Global supply chain management and network complexity Information and knowledge management Legal, financial and public policy Retailing, channels and business-to-business management Organizational and human resource development Logistics and SCM education.
期刊最新文献
Cyber risk management strategies and integration: toward supply chain cyber resilience and robustness The paradoxical nature of greening transportation: an analysis of tensions in buyer–supplier dyads System-level impacts of electrification on the road freight transport system: a dynamic approach Navigating diversity in supply chain relationships: building trustworthiness through complementary and supplementary fits The impact of order fulfillment on consumer experience: text mining consumer reviews from Amazon US
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1