Isha W. Metzger, Maryam Jernigan-Noesi, Shawn C. T. Jones, Erlanger A. Turner, Farzana Saleem, Jessica Jackson, Riana Elyse Anderson, Lisa A. Bartolomeo, Petty Tineo, Ijeoma Opara
{"title":"Power to the People: Measuring Social Media and Mass Media Impact for Promotion and Tenure in Social and Applied Sciences","authors":"Isha W. Metzger, Maryam Jernigan-Noesi, Shawn C. T. Jones, Erlanger A. Turner, Farzana Saleem, Jessica Jackson, Riana Elyse Anderson, Lisa A. Bartolomeo, Petty Tineo, Ijeoma Opara","doi":"10.1057/s41307-023-00337-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Promotion and tenure (P&T) is the process by which academic faculty are evaluated on the trajectory and impact of their scholarly career. Faculty are typically assessed on their grants, publications, teaching, and service. Ethnically minoritized faculty face disparities in P&T, perhaps due to the lack of standards for quantifying their efforts in the community and scholarship that is relevant to issues of social justice and public concern. Efforts in social and mass media to translate research findings and to disseminate evidence-based prevention and intervention efforts, however, are not often considered in P&T despite their direct impact on the community and contribution to the field. This paper discusses how the academy can quantify and qualify the impact of social media and mass media work in existing P&T considerations, particularly for departments with faculty in social and applied sciences. We discuss how social media and mass media work can be evaluated within existing P&T review criteria, and we provide suggestions for committees to quantify the impact of online and media efforts. Last, we conclude with suggestions for departments, colleges, academic medical centers, and universities in higher education to support early career faculty who are engaging in this extremely important, often under-rewarded work.</p>","PeriodicalId":47327,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education Policy","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education Policy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-023-00337-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Promotion and tenure (P&T) is the process by which academic faculty are evaluated on the trajectory and impact of their scholarly career. Faculty are typically assessed on their grants, publications, teaching, and service. Ethnically minoritized faculty face disparities in P&T, perhaps due to the lack of standards for quantifying their efforts in the community and scholarship that is relevant to issues of social justice and public concern. Efforts in social and mass media to translate research findings and to disseminate evidence-based prevention and intervention efforts, however, are not often considered in P&T despite their direct impact on the community and contribution to the field. This paper discusses how the academy can quantify and qualify the impact of social media and mass media work in existing P&T considerations, particularly for departments with faculty in social and applied sciences. We discuss how social media and mass media work can be evaluated within existing P&T review criteria, and we provide suggestions for committees to quantify the impact of online and media efforts. Last, we conclude with suggestions for departments, colleges, academic medical centers, and universities in higher education to support early career faculty who are engaging in this extremely important, often under-rewarded work.
期刊介绍:
Higher Education Policy is an international peer-reviewed and SSCI-indexed academic journal focusing on higher education policy in a broad sense. The journal considers submissions that discuss national and supra-national higher education policies and/or analyse their impacts on higher education institutions or the academic community: leadership, faculty, staff and students, but also considers papers that deal with governance and policy issues at the level of higher education institutions. Critical analyses, empirical investigations (either qualitative or quantitative), and theoretical-conceptual contributions are equally welcome, but for all submissions the requirement is that papers be embedded in the relevant academic literature and contribute to furthering our understanding of policy.
The journal has a preference for papers that are written from a disciplinary or interdisciplinary perspective. In the past, contributors have relied on perspectives from public administration, political science, sociology, history, economics and law, but also from philosophy, psychology and anthropology. Articles devoted to systems of higher education that are less well-known or less often analysed are particularly welcome.
Given the international scope of the journal, articles should be written for and be understood by an international audience, consisting of researchers in higher education, disciplinary researchers, and policy-makers, administrators, managers and practitioners in higher education. Contributions should not normally exceed 7,000 words (excluding references). Peer reviewAll submissions to the journal will undergo rigorous peer review (anonymous referees) after an initial editorial screening on quality and fit with the journal''s aims.Special issues
The journal welcomes proposals for special issues. The journal archive contains several examples of special issues. Such proposals, to be sent to the editor, should set out the theme of the special issue and include the names of the (proposed) contributors and summaries of the envisaged contributions. Forum section
Occasionally, the journal publishes contributions – in its Forum section – based on personal viewpoints and/or experiences with the intent to stimulate discussion and reflection, or to challenge established thinking in the field of higher education.