Verifying Hypotheses of Drug Bioequivalence

M. A. Dranitsyna, T. V. Zakharova, P. V. Panov
{"title":"Verifying Hypotheses of Drug Bioequivalence","authors":"M. A. Dranitsyna, T. V. Zakharova, P. V. Panov","doi":"10.3103/s0278641923040143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>The problem of testing pharmaceuticals on their bioequivalence is considered. Investigations of drug bioequivalence are the basis for reproducing drugs that confirm their efficiency and safety. The main way of verifying drug bioequivalence is to conduct two one-sided Schuirmann tests. Two one-sided tests have been used for many years and proven their validity for proving equivalent bioavailability, but in some situations (missing data, the necessity of considering not only the aggregate metrics but also the shape of the concentration–time curve) there is a need to establish more accurately the differences between the concentration–time curves. The authors present a new criterion that is more sensitive to the differences between characteristics that affect drug bioavailability and reduce the risk for patients. In should be noted that the new criterion generalizes the Schuirmann criterion and preserves its useful properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":501582,"journal":{"name":"Moscow University Computational Mathematics and Cybernetics","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Moscow University Computational Mathematics and Cybernetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3103/s0278641923040143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The problem of testing pharmaceuticals on their bioequivalence is considered. Investigations of drug bioequivalence are the basis for reproducing drugs that confirm their efficiency and safety. The main way of verifying drug bioequivalence is to conduct two one-sided Schuirmann tests. Two one-sided tests have been used for many years and proven their validity for proving equivalent bioavailability, but in some situations (missing data, the necessity of considering not only the aggregate metrics but also the shape of the concentration–time curve) there is a need to establish more accurately the differences between the concentration–time curves. The authors present a new criterion that is more sensitive to the differences between characteristics that affect drug bioavailability and reduce the risk for patients. In should be noted that the new criterion generalizes the Schuirmann criterion and preserves its useful properties.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证药物生物等效性假设
摘要 本文探讨了药物的生物等效性测试问题。对药物生物等效性的研究是再现药物并确认其有效性和安全性的基础。验证药物生物等效性的主要方法是进行两次单侧舒尔曼试验。两个单侧试验已使用多年,证明了其在证明等效生物利用度方面的有效性,但在某些情况下(数据缺失、不仅需要考虑总量指标,还需要考虑浓度-时间曲线的形状),需要更准确地确定浓度-时间曲线之间的差异。作者提出的新标准对影响药物生物利用度和降低患者风险的特征之间的差异更为敏感。应该指出的是,新标准概括了舒尔曼标准,并保留了其有用的特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On Maxima of Stationary Delay in the $${M/G/2}$$ Systems Nonsingular Solutions of the Matrix Equation $$\boldsymbol{XAX=AXA}$$ and the Centralizer of the Matrix $$\boldsymbol{A}$$ On the Cardinality Computation Problem for Regular Languages over Symmetric Groups Constructing Reachable Sets for a Class of Nonsmooth Control Systems on a Plane Reconstructing Unknown Coefficients of Stochastic Differential Equations and Intelligently Predicting Random Processes with Directed Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1