Smiling women pitching down: auditing representational and presentational gender biases in image-generative AI

IF 5.4 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication Pub Date : 2024-02-02 DOI:10.1093/jcmc/zmad045
Luhang Sun, Mian Wei, Yibing Sun, Yoo Ji Suh, Liwei Shen, Sijia Yang
{"title":"Smiling women pitching down: auditing representational and presentational gender biases in image-generative AI","authors":"Luhang Sun, Mian Wei, Yibing Sun, Yoo Ji Suh, Liwei Shen, Sijia Yang","doi":"10.1093/jcmc/zmad045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) models like DALL·E 2 can interpret prompts and generate high-quality images that exhibit human creativity. Though public enthusiasm is booming, systematic auditing of potential gender biases in AI-generated images remains scarce. We addressed this gap by examining the prevalence of two occupational gender biases (representational and presentational biases) in 15,300 DALL·E 2 images spanning 153 occupations. We assessed potential bias amplification by benchmarking against the 2021 U.S. census data and Google Images. Our findings reveal that DALL·E 2 underrepresents women in male-dominated fields while overrepresenting them in female-dominated occupations. Additionally, DALL·E 2 images tend to depict more women than men with smiles and downward-pitching heads, particularly in female-dominated (versus male-dominated) occupations. Our algorithm auditing study demonstrates more pronounced representational and presentational biases in DALL·E 2 compared to Google Images and calls for feminist interventions to curtail the potential impacts of such biased AI-generated images on the media ecology.","PeriodicalId":48319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication","volume":"254 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmad045","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) models like DALL·E 2 can interpret prompts and generate high-quality images that exhibit human creativity. Though public enthusiasm is booming, systematic auditing of potential gender biases in AI-generated images remains scarce. We addressed this gap by examining the prevalence of two occupational gender biases (representational and presentational biases) in 15,300 DALL·E 2 images spanning 153 occupations. We assessed potential bias amplification by benchmarking against the 2021 U.S. census data and Google Images. Our findings reveal that DALL·E 2 underrepresents women in male-dominated fields while overrepresenting them in female-dominated occupations. Additionally, DALL·E 2 images tend to depict more women than men with smiles and downward-pitching heads, particularly in female-dominated (versus male-dominated) occupations. Our algorithm auditing study demonstrates more pronounced representational and presentational biases in DALL·E 2 compared to Google Images and calls for feminist interventions to curtail the potential impacts of such biased AI-generated images on the media ecology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微笑的女性俯视:审核图像生成人工智能中的表象和呈现性别偏见
像 DALL-E 2 这样的人工智能(AI)生成模型可以解释提示并生成展现人类创造力的高质量图像。虽然公众的热情高涨,但对人工智能生成图像中潜在的性别偏见进行系统审核的情况仍然很少。为了弥补这一不足,我们研究了 15300 张 DALL-E 2 图像(涵盖 153 种职业)中两种职业性别偏差(表现性偏差和呈现性偏差)的普遍程度。我们以 2021 年美国人口普查数据和谷歌图片为基准,评估了潜在的偏差放大。我们的研究结果表明,DALL-E 2 对男性主导领域的女性代表不足,而对女性主导职业的女性代表过多。此外,DALL-E 2 图像倾向于描绘女性多于男性的微笑和下垂的头部,尤其是在女性占主导地位(相对于男性占主导地位)的职业中。我们的算法审计研究表明,与谷歌图片相比,《DALL-E 2》在表现形式和呈现方式上存在更明显的偏差,并呼吁女权主义者进行干预,以减少人工智能生成的图片对媒体生态的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (JCMC) has been a longstanding contributor to the field of computer-mediated communication research. Since its inception in 1995, it has been a pioneer in web-based, peer-reviewed scholarly publications. JCMC encourages interdisciplinary research, welcoming contributions from various disciplines, such as communication, business, education, political science, sociology, psychology, media studies, and information science. The journal's commitment to open access and high-quality standards has solidified its status as a reputable source for scholars exploring the dynamics of communication in the digital age.
期刊最新文献
Momentary motivations for digital disconnection: an experience sampling study Correction by distraction: how high-tempo music enhances medical experts’ debunking TikTok videos Does ostracism/rejection impact self-disclosures? Examining the appeal of perceived social affordances after social threat Subtle momentary effects of social media experiences: an experience sampling study of posting and social comparisons on connectedness and self-esteem Surviving or thriving political defeat on social media: a temporal analysis of how electoral loss exacerbates the gender gap in political expression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1