A Novel Fusion of Radiomics and Semantic Features: MRI-Based Machine Learning in Distinguishing Pituitary Cystic Adenomas from Rathke's Cleft Cysts.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-02-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5334/jbsr.3470
Ceylan Altintas Taslicay, Elmire Dervisoglu, Okan Ince, Ismail Mese, Cengizhan Taslicay, Busra Yaprak Bayrak, Burak Cabuk, Ihsan Anik, Savas Ceylan, Yonca Anik
{"title":"A Novel Fusion of Radiomics and Semantic Features: MRI-Based Machine Learning in Distinguishing Pituitary Cystic Adenomas from Rathke's Cleft Cysts.","authors":"Ceylan Altintas Taslicay, Elmire Dervisoglu, Okan Ince, Ismail Mese, Cengizhan Taslicay, Busra Yaprak Bayrak, Burak Cabuk, Ihsan Anik, Savas Ceylan, Yonca Anik","doi":"10.5334/jbsr.3470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the performances of machine learning using semantic and radiomic features from magnetic resonance imaging data to distinguish cystic pituitary adenomas (CPA) from Rathke's cleft cysts (RCCs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study involved 65 patients diagnosed with either CPA or RCCs. Multiple observers independently assessed the semantic features of the tumors on the magnetic resonance images. Radiomics features were extracted from T2-weighted, T1-weighted, and T1-contrast-enhanced images. Machine learning models, including Support Vector Machines (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), and Light Gradient Boosting (LGB), were then trained and validated using semantic features only and a combination of semantic and radiomic features. Statistical analyses were carried out to compare the performance of these various models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Machine learning models that combined semantic and radiomic features achieved higher levels of accuracy than models with semantic features only. Models with combined semantic and T2-weighted radiomics features achieved the highest test accuracies (93.8%, 92.3%, and 90.8% for LR, SVM, and LGB, respectively). The SVM model combined semantic features with T2-weighted radiomics features had statistically significantly better performance than semantic features only (<i>p</i> = 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrates the significant potential of machine learning for differentiating CPA from RCCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10836174/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.3470","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the performances of machine learning using semantic and radiomic features from magnetic resonance imaging data to distinguish cystic pituitary adenomas (CPA) from Rathke's cleft cysts (RCCs).

Materials and methods: The study involved 65 patients diagnosed with either CPA or RCCs. Multiple observers independently assessed the semantic features of the tumors on the magnetic resonance images. Radiomics features were extracted from T2-weighted, T1-weighted, and T1-contrast-enhanced images. Machine learning models, including Support Vector Machines (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), and Light Gradient Boosting (LGB), were then trained and validated using semantic features only and a combination of semantic and radiomic features. Statistical analyses were carried out to compare the performance of these various models.

Results: Machine learning models that combined semantic and radiomic features achieved higher levels of accuracy than models with semantic features only. Models with combined semantic and T2-weighted radiomics features achieved the highest test accuracies (93.8%, 92.3%, and 90.8% for LR, SVM, and LGB, respectively). The SVM model combined semantic features with T2-weighted radiomics features had statistically significantly better performance than semantic features only (p = 0.019).

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the significant potential of machine learning for differentiating CPA from RCCs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放射组学与语义特征的新融合:基于磁共振成像的机器学习在区分垂体囊腺瘤和拉氏裂隙囊肿中的应用。
目的评估机器学习利用磁共振成像数据中的语义和放射学特征区分囊性垂体腺瘤(CPA)和拉氏裂隙囊肿(RCC)的性能:研究涉及 65 名确诊为 CPA 或 RCC 的患者。多名观察者独立评估磁共振图像上肿瘤的语义特征。从T2加权、T1加权和T1-对比度增强图像中提取放射组学特征。然后,只使用语义特征以及语义特征与放射组学特征的组合来训练和验证机器学习模型,包括支持向量机(SVM)、逻辑回归(LR)和光梯度提升(LGB)。为了比较这些不同模型的性能,我们进行了统计分析:结果:与仅使用语义特征的模型相比,结合语义和放射体特征的机器学习模型达到了更高的准确度。结合语义和 T2 加权放射组学特征的模型达到了最高的测试准确率(LR、SVM 和 LGB 分别为 93.8%、92.3% 和 90.8%)。将语义特征与 T2 加权放射组学特征相结合的 SVM 模型在统计学上明显优于仅有语义特征的模型(p = 0.019):我们的研究证明了机器学习在区分 CPA 和 RCC 方面的巨大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology
Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology is the publication of articles dealing with diagnostic and interventional radiology, related imaging techniques, allied sciences, and continuing education.
期刊最新文献
Rectification of Erroneous Chronological Dating of Three Anecdotal Events Occurring in the Early History of Radiology in Berlin. Extrapelvic Endometriosis Involving Pudendal and Sciatic Nerve Causing Obturator Muscle Atrophy. Hepatic Artery Aneurysm-A Rare Cause of Cholestasis. Congenital Abnormalities Causing Hematocolpos: A Pictorial Essay. Analysis of Spinal Pilocytic Astrocytoma in 12 Case Reports and Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1