Evaluating the effectiveness of a clinical nurse specialist triage role in a specialist palliative care community service.

Emer Hough, Jacqueline Reed, Martina O'Reilly, Michael Lucey
{"title":"Evaluating the effectiveness of a clinical nurse specialist triage role in a specialist palliative care community service.","authors":"Emer Hough, Jacqueline Reed, Martina O'Reilly, Michael Lucey","doi":"10.12968/ijpn.2024.30.1.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2017, a clinical nurse specialist (CNS) triaging role was created within a specialist palliative care community service (SPCCS) in Ireland to enhance the triage process. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the role regarding data collection and reporting. Structured feedback from healthcare professionals (HCPs) was obtained on the effects, challenges and sustainability of this role.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a mixed-methods approach. A quantitative analysis of referrals triaged by the SPCCS CNS over 2 years (2018-2019) was performed. Two focus groups with HCP's within the same service were completed in January 2020 and one-to-one interviews were conducted. The quantitative and qualitative results were merged using a triangulation protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2017, new health service executive (HSE) standards to categorise the urgency of patient assessment were introduced. Quantitatively, an improvement within the triage process was seen, with an increase in compliance with national access standards. In 2018, compliance was 89.1%. In 2019, this was 96.8%, an improvement of 7.7%. A data discrepancy of 9.5% of referrals was noted over the first 9 months of 2018. After this, data documentation and congruency were seen to improve for the final 3 months of 2018 to 100% and remained at 100%. Qualitative data highlighted the benefits and challenges of the Triage CNS role. Mixed-methods correlation revealed corroboration between both using a triangulation protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The triage CNS role was pivotal as an initial point of referral contact. Increased compliance with national access standards occurred resulting in improvements in case and case-load management, information gathering, documentation, data collection and analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94055,"journal":{"name":"International journal of palliative nursing","volume":"30 1","pages":"29-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of palliative nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2024.30.1.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2017, a clinical nurse specialist (CNS) triaging role was created within a specialist palliative care community service (SPCCS) in Ireland to enhance the triage process. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the role regarding data collection and reporting. Structured feedback from healthcare professionals (HCPs) was obtained on the effects, challenges and sustainability of this role.

Methods: This study used a mixed-methods approach. A quantitative analysis of referrals triaged by the SPCCS CNS over 2 years (2018-2019) was performed. Two focus groups with HCP's within the same service were completed in January 2020 and one-to-one interviews were conducted. The quantitative and qualitative results were merged using a triangulation protocol.

Results: In 2017, new health service executive (HSE) standards to categorise the urgency of patient assessment were introduced. Quantitatively, an improvement within the triage process was seen, with an increase in compliance with national access standards. In 2018, compliance was 89.1%. In 2019, this was 96.8%, an improvement of 7.7%. A data discrepancy of 9.5% of referrals was noted over the first 9 months of 2018. After this, data documentation and congruency were seen to improve for the final 3 months of 2018 to 100% and remained at 100%. Qualitative data highlighted the benefits and challenges of the Triage CNS role. Mixed-methods correlation revealed corroboration between both using a triangulation protocol.

Conclusion: The triage CNS role was pivotal as an initial point of referral contact. Increased compliance with national access standards occurred resulting in improvements in case and case-load management, information gathering, documentation, data collection and analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估专科姑息关怀社区服务中临床专科护士分流角色的有效性。
背景:2017 年,爱尔兰一家专科姑息关怀社区服务机构(SPCCS)设立了临床专科护士(CNS)分诊角色,以加强分诊流程。本研究旨在评估该角色在数据收集和报告方面的有效性。从医护专业人员(HCPs)处获得关于该角色的效果、挑战和可持续性的结构化反馈:本研究采用了混合方法。对 SPCCS CNS 两年来(2018-2019 年)分流的转诊进行了定量分析。在 2020 年 1 月完成了与同一服务机构的 HCP 的两个焦点小组讨论,并进行了一对一访谈。采用三角测量协议对定量和定性结果进行了合并:2017 年,卫生服务执行局(HSE)引入了新的标准,对患者评估的紧迫性进行分类。从数量上看,分诊流程有所改善,符合国家就诊标准的比例有所提高。2018 年,达标率为 89.1%。2019 年,达标率为 96.8%,提高了 7.7%。在 2018 年的前 9 个月中,有 9.5% 的转诊数据存在差异。此后,数据记录和一致性在 2018 年的最后 3 个月有所改善,达到 100%,并保持在 100%。定性数据强调了分诊 CNS 角色的益处和挑战。混合方法的相关性显示了使用三角测量协议的两者之间的相互印证:分诊 CNS 作为转诊联系的初始点发挥了关键作用。通过改善病例和病例负荷管理、信息收集、文件记录、数据收集和分析,进一步遵守了国家就诊标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A state-of-the-art review of community-based palliative care services in rural areas of Southern Minnesota and the United States. Exploring the patients' and family members' perspectives on home-based palliative care. Hospice educators' perspectives on e-learning in palliative care education in Ireland. Paediatric palliative care in low- and middle-income countries. Research Roundup.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1