Perceived Parental Style Is Better in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease than Healthy Controls—But There Is Work Left to Do in Specific Subgroups

Leon Brudy, J. Hock, L. Willinger, R. Oberhoffer-Fritz, Alfred Hager, Peter Ewert, Jan Müller
{"title":"Perceived Parental Style Is Better in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease than Healthy Controls—But There Is Work Left to Do in Specific Subgroups","authors":"Leon Brudy, J. Hock, L. Willinger, R. Oberhoffer-Fritz, Alfred Hager, Peter Ewert, Jan Müller","doi":"10.3390/jvd3010005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare perceived parental style in a large cohort of adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) to healthy reference (RCs). Furthermore, factors associated with perceived parental style were determined in ACHD. Patients and Methods: From September 2016 to April 2019, 912 ACHD (34.9 ± 10.4 years, 45% female) and 175 RCs (35.8 ± 12.2 years, 53% female) completed the Measure of Parental Style (MOPS) questionnaire. Results: After adjusting for age and sex, ACHD recalled the parental style of both their parents to be significantly less indifferent (mother: ACHD: 1.2 ± 0.01 vs. RC: 1.3 ± 0.03, p < 0.001; father: ACHD: 1.3 ± 0.02 vs. RC: 1.7 ± 0.05, p < 0.001), overcontrolling (mother: ACHD: 1.6 ± 0.63 vs. RC: 1.9 ± 0.62, p < 0.001; father: ACHD: 1.4 ± 0.52 vs. RC: 1.5 ± 0.50, p < 0.001), and abusive (mother: ACHD: 1.2 ± 0.47 vs. RC: 1.4 ± 0.46, p < 0.001; father: ACHD: 1.3 ± 0.59 vs. RC: 1.5 ± 0.57, p < 0.001) than healthy controls did. In ACHD, female sex (β = 0.068, p = 0.017), higher age (β = 0.005, p = 0.003), Ebstein anomaly (β = 0.170, p = 0.005), and cyanotic CHD (β = 0.336, p = 0.004) contribute to perceiving the parental style of at least one of the parents negatively. Conclusions: While ACHD appear to recall the parental style to be less negative, subgroup analysis revealed specific patients at risk. These findings point to the need for interventions in specific subgroups susceptible to psychological distress.","PeriodicalId":74009,"journal":{"name":"Journal of vascular diseases","volume":"11 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of vascular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jvd3010005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare perceived parental style in a large cohort of adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) to healthy reference (RCs). Furthermore, factors associated with perceived parental style were determined in ACHD. Patients and Methods: From September 2016 to April 2019, 912 ACHD (34.9 ± 10.4 years, 45% female) and 175 RCs (35.8 ± 12.2 years, 53% female) completed the Measure of Parental Style (MOPS) questionnaire. Results: After adjusting for age and sex, ACHD recalled the parental style of both their parents to be significantly less indifferent (mother: ACHD: 1.2 ± 0.01 vs. RC: 1.3 ± 0.03, p < 0.001; father: ACHD: 1.3 ± 0.02 vs. RC: 1.7 ± 0.05, p < 0.001), overcontrolling (mother: ACHD: 1.6 ± 0.63 vs. RC: 1.9 ± 0.62, p < 0.001; father: ACHD: 1.4 ± 0.52 vs. RC: 1.5 ± 0.50, p < 0.001), and abusive (mother: ACHD: 1.2 ± 0.47 vs. RC: 1.4 ± 0.46, p < 0.001; father: ACHD: 1.3 ± 0.59 vs. RC: 1.5 ± 0.57, p < 0.001) than healthy controls did. In ACHD, female sex (β = 0.068, p = 0.017), higher age (β = 0.005, p = 0.003), Ebstein anomaly (β = 0.170, p = 0.005), and cyanotic CHD (β = 0.336, p = 0.004) contribute to perceiving the parental style of at least one of the parents negatively. Conclusions: While ACHD appear to recall the parental style to be less negative, subgroup analysis revealed specific patients at risk. These findings point to the need for interventions in specific subgroups susceptible to psychological distress.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与健康对照组相比,先天性心脏病成人对父母风格的感知更好--但在特定亚群体中仍有工作要做
目的比较一大批患有先天性心脏病(ACHD)的成年人与健康参照者(RCs)对父母风格的感知。此外,还要确定与先天性心脏病患者感知到的父母风格相关的因素。患者和方法:从 2016 年 9 月到 2019 年 4 月,912 名先天性心脏病患者(34.9 ± 10.4 岁,45% 为女性)和 175 名健康参考者(35.8 ± 12.2 岁,53% 为女性)完成了父母风格测量(MOPS)问卷。结果显示在对年龄和性别进行调整后,儿童慢性阻塞性肺病患者回忆起父母双方的父母风格时,对他们的冷漠程度明显降低(母亲:1.2 ± 12.2;儿童慢性阻塞性肺病患者:1.2 ± 12.2;母亲:1.2 ± 12.2):母亲:1.2 ± 0.01 vs. RC:1.3 ± 0.03,p < 0.001;父亲:1.3 ± 0.01 vs. RC:1.3 ± 0.03,p < 0.001:ACHD:1.3 ± 0.02 vs. RC:1.7 ± 0.05,p < 0.001)、过度控制(母亲:1.6 ± 0.02 vs. RC:1.7 ± 0.05,p < 0.001ACHD: 1.6 ± 0.63 vs. RC: 1.9 ± 0.62, p < 0.001; father:母亲:ACHD:1.4 ± 0.52 vs. RC:1.5 ± 0.50,p < 0.001)和虐待(母亲:ACHD:1.2 ± 0.52 vs. RC:1.5 ± 0.50,p < 0.001):ACHD: 1.2 ± 0.47 vs. RC: 1.4 ± 0.46, p < 0.001; father:父亲:ACHD:1.3 ± 0.59 vs. RC:1.5 ± 0.57,p < 0.001)。在 ACHD 患者中,女性(β = 0.068,p = 0.017)、较高年龄(β = 0.005,p = 0.003)、Ebstein 异常(β = 0.170,p = 0.005)和紫绀型先天性心脏病(β = 0.336,p = 0.004)会导致对父母中至少一方的育儿方式产生负面看法。结论:虽然 ACHD 患者回忆起的父母风格似乎不那么负面,但亚组分析揭示了特定患者的风险。这些发现表明,有必要对易受心理困扰的特定亚组进行干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Evaluation Value of Non-Invasive Indices of Arterial Stiffness in the Early Stage of Coronary Artery Disease: Preliminary Results from an Exploratory Study Systemic Arterial Function after Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children Associated with COVID-19 Biochemical Insights and Clinical Applications of Ischemia-Modified Albumin in Ischemic Conditions Effect of Microencapsulated Cocoa Polyphenols on Macro- and Microvascular Function after Eccentric Exercise Perivascular Adipose Tissue Density and Stenosis Plaque Degree in Lower Limb Peripheral Arteries in CT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1