HBsAg kinetics after 7 years of therapy with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in a cohort of naïve patients affected by chronic hepatitis B with different genotypes

Lucio Boglione , Tommaso Lupia , Giacomo Stroffolini , Valentina Dodaro , Giovanni Di Perri
{"title":"HBsAg kinetics after 7 years of therapy with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in a cohort of naïve patients affected by chronic hepatitis B with different genotypes","authors":"Lucio Boglione ,&nbsp;Tommaso Lupia ,&nbsp;Giacomo Stroffolini ,&nbsp;Valentina Dodaro ,&nbsp;Giovanni Di Perri","doi":"10.1016/j.imj.2024.100087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The role of different genotypes in nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) treatment is still debated. Previous studies conducted on special populations evidenced that the E genotype had the lower virological and serological response. This descriptive study aims to recognize the hepatitis B “s” antigen (HBsAg) decline during tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) treatment in a cohort of patient affected by chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We retrospectively included all patients with CHB treated with TDF between April 2007 and March 2012 with a duration of treatment of 7 years. Kinetics of HBsAg was determined as serological response in this cohort. We include 110 subjects; virological response was observed in all subjects with genotypes A, B, and D; in 17 patients with C genotype (94.4%) and 24 with E genotype (96%). HBeAg loss was observed in 2 patients with genotype A (50%), 3 with B (100%), 0 with C (0%), 1 with D (20%), and 1 with E genotype (25%). In multivariate analysis we observed as predictive factors of HBsAg decline the baseline level of HBsAg (OR = 1.467; 95%CI: 1.221–5.113; <em>p</em> = 0.017) and viral genotypes (OR = 11.218; 95%CI: 5.441–41.138; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). This study confirmed higher HBsAg decline after 7 years of treatment in A and B genotypes, and lower in C, E, and D genotypes. However, no evidence is enough to choose a single NAs, but in special populations, as well as in genotype E, the use of TDF should be preferred to entecavir.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100667,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100087"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772431X24000017/pdfft?md5=9c0e74705261b2b3e144603d1fcee903&pid=1-s2.0-S2772431X24000017-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772431X24000017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The role of different genotypes in nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) treatment is still debated. Previous studies conducted on special populations evidenced that the E genotype had the lower virological and serological response. This descriptive study aims to recognize the hepatitis B “s” antigen (HBsAg) decline during tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) treatment in a cohort of patient affected by chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We retrospectively included all patients with CHB treated with TDF between April 2007 and March 2012 with a duration of treatment of 7 years. Kinetics of HBsAg was determined as serological response in this cohort. We include 110 subjects; virological response was observed in all subjects with genotypes A, B, and D; in 17 patients with C genotype (94.4%) and 24 with E genotype (96%). HBeAg loss was observed in 2 patients with genotype A (50%), 3 with B (100%), 0 with C (0%), 1 with D (20%), and 1 with E genotype (25%). In multivariate analysis we observed as predictive factors of HBsAg decline the baseline level of HBsAg (OR = 1.467; 95%CI: 1.221–5.113; p = 0.017) and viral genotypes (OR = 11.218; 95%CI: 5.441–41.138; p < 0.001). This study confirmed higher HBsAg decline after 7 years of treatment in A and B genotypes, and lower in C, E, and D genotypes. However, no evidence is enough to choose a single NAs, but in special populations, as well as in genotype E, the use of TDF should be preferred to entecavir.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一组不同基因型的慢性乙型肝炎新患者接受富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯治疗 7 年后的 HBsAg 动力学研究
不同基因型在核苷(t)类似物(NAs)治疗中的作用仍存在争议。以前对特殊人群进行的研究表明,E 基因型的病毒学和血清学反应较低。这项描述性研究旨在了解富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯(TDF)治疗期间慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者队列中乙肝 "s "抗原(HBsAg)下降的情况。我们回顾性地纳入了2007年4月至2012年3月期间接受TDF治疗的所有慢性乙型肝炎患者,治疗时间为7年。HBsAg 的动力学被确定为该队列中的血清学应答。我们共纳入了 110 名受试者;所有基因型为 A、B 和 D 的受试者都观察到了病毒学应答;基因型为 C 的患者有 17 人(94.4%),基因型为 E 的患者有 24 人(96%)。2 名基因型为 A 的患者(50%)、3 名基因型为 B 的患者(100%)、0 名基因型为 C 的患者(0%)、1 名基因型为 D 的患者(20%)和 1 名基因型为 E 的患者(25%)出现 HBeAg 消失。在多变量分析中,我们发现 HBsAg 基线水平(OR = 1.467; 95%CI: 1.221-5.113; p = 0.017)和病毒基因型(OR = 11.218; 95%CI: 5.441-41.138; p <0.001)是 HBsAg 下降的预测因素。这项研究证实,治疗 7 年后,A 和 B 基因型患者的 HBsAg 下降率较高,而 C、E 和 D 基因型患者的下降率较低。然而,没有足够的证据表明可以选择单一的 NAs,但在特殊人群和基因型 E 中,使用 TDF 应优于恩替卡韦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leveraging computer-aided design and artificial intelligence to develop a next-generation multi-epitope tuberculosis vaccine candidate Tick-, flea- and mite-borne pathogens and associated diseases of public health importance in Bangladesh: a review Molecular epidemiology of Burkholderia pseudomallei in Hainan Province of China based on O-antigen The critical role of health policy and management in epidemic control: COVID-19 and beyond Vagal nerve stimulation for the management of long COVID symptoms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1