Optimization of intraoperative lumpectomy specimen labeling

Matthew J. Piotrowski , Min Yi , Carissa Le-Petross , Mediget Teshome , Henry M. Kuerer , Joanna Lee , Kelly K. Hunt , Sarah M. DeSnyder
{"title":"Optimization of intraoperative lumpectomy specimen labeling","authors":"Matthew J. Piotrowski ,&nbsp;Min Yi ,&nbsp;Carissa Le-Petross ,&nbsp;Mediget Teshome ,&nbsp;Henry M. Kuerer ,&nbsp;Joanna Lee ,&nbsp;Kelly K. Hunt ,&nbsp;Sarah M. DeSnyder","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Accurate lumpectomy specimen orientation is critical as incorrect orientation may result in excision of the wrong lumpectomy margin. Our goal was to determine if specimen orientation achieved by labeling three surfaces is superior to two.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a prospective single-institution study including 22 breast surgical oncologists. Intraoperative labeling of either two or three surfaces of the lumpectomy specimen was based on surgeon preference. The specimen was delivered to Pathology where it was oriented by the pathology team and the surgeon then determined if the specimen was correctly oriented or if re-orientation was required. Surgeons subsequently recorded orientation technique and if re-orientation was required. Specimen weight, patient age, and BMI were recorded. Fisher’s exact test and two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to determine p-values.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 268 specimens, 40 (14.9%) required re-orientation. Labeling specimens on three surfaces was superior to two (22 of 195 (11.2%) versus 18 of 73 (24.6%), p = 0.01). Specimens requiring re-orientation were more likely to be heavier (36 g vs. 24 g, p = 0.02). In multivariable analysis, labeling specimens on three surfaces resulted in a 70% reduction in discordance rates between the surgeon and pathology team (OR 0.3, p = 0.001). Using mean weight of lumpectomy specimens, specimens &gt;33 g were more likely to require reorientation (OR 2.8, p = 0.004). Age and BMI did not impact the need for re-orientation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Lumpectomy specimen labeling using three surfaces was superior to two. Surgeons should routinely orient their specimens on three or more surfaces to decrease discordance rates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000045/pdfft?md5=2de8d74059e648ae0bed420a939b8390&pid=1-s2.0-S2950247024000045-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology Insight","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Accurate lumpectomy specimen orientation is critical as incorrect orientation may result in excision of the wrong lumpectomy margin. Our goal was to determine if specimen orientation achieved by labeling three surfaces is superior to two.

Methods

This was a prospective single-institution study including 22 breast surgical oncologists. Intraoperative labeling of either two or three surfaces of the lumpectomy specimen was based on surgeon preference. The specimen was delivered to Pathology where it was oriented by the pathology team and the surgeon then determined if the specimen was correctly oriented or if re-orientation was required. Surgeons subsequently recorded orientation technique and if re-orientation was required. Specimen weight, patient age, and BMI were recorded. Fisher’s exact test and two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to determine p-values.

Results

Of 268 specimens, 40 (14.9%) required re-orientation. Labeling specimens on three surfaces was superior to two (22 of 195 (11.2%) versus 18 of 73 (24.6%), p = 0.01). Specimens requiring re-orientation were more likely to be heavier (36 g vs. 24 g, p = 0.02). In multivariable analysis, labeling specimens on three surfaces resulted in a 70% reduction in discordance rates between the surgeon and pathology team (OR 0.3, p = 0.001). Using mean weight of lumpectomy specimens, specimens >33 g were more likely to require reorientation (OR 2.8, p = 0.004). Age and BMI did not impact the need for re-orientation.

Conclusion

Lumpectomy specimen labeling using three surfaces was superior to two. Surgeons should routinely orient their specimens on three or more surfaces to decrease discordance rates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术中肿瘤切除术标本标记的优化
背景准确的肿块切除标本定位至关重要,因为错误的定位可能导致切除错误的肿块切除边缘。我们的目标是确定标记三个表面的标本定位是否优于标记两个表面的标本定位。方法这是一项前瞻性单机构研究,包括 22 位乳腺外科肿瘤学家。术中根据外科医生的偏好对肿块切除术标本的两个或三个表面进行标记。标本被送至病理科,由病理科团队进行定向,然后由外科医生确定标本的定向是否正确或是否需要重新定向。外科医生随后记录定位技术以及是否需要重新定位。标本重量、患者年龄和体重指数均有记录。结果 在 268 个标本中,有 40 个(14.9%)需要重新定向。对标本的三个表面进行标记优于对两个表面进行标记(195 例中的 22 例(11.2%)对 73 例中的 18 例(24.6%),P = 0.01)。需要重新定向的标本可能更重(36 克比 24 克,p = 0.02)。在多变量分析中,在三个表面标注标本可使外科医生和病理团队之间的不一致率降低 70%(OR 0.3,p = 0.001)。根据肿瘤切除标本的平均重量,33 克的标本更有可能需要重新定向(OR 2.8,p = 0.004)。年龄和体重指数对重新定向的需求没有影响。外科医生应定期在三个或更多表面上标注标本方向,以降低不一致率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Combining liver-directed and immunotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A review and future directions Timing of breast biopsy and axillary ultrasound does not affect the false positive rate of the axillary ultrasound Small bowel cancers: A population-based analysis of epidemiology, treatment and outcomes in Ontario, Canada from 2005-2020 Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy Prehabilitation (PrePFPT) for the prevention of low anterior resection syndrome Pepsinogen and Helicobacter pylori: Serum biomarkers for gastric cancer risk in a diverse United States population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1