Well-Log-Based Reservoir Property Estimation With Machine Learning: A Contest Summary

Lei Fu, Yanxiang Yu, Chicheng Xu, Michael Ashby, Andrew McDonald, Wen Pan, Tianqi Deng, István Szabó, Pál P. Hanzelik, Csilla Kalmár, Saleh Alatwah, Jaehyuk Lee
{"title":"Well-Log-Based Reservoir Property Estimation With Machine Learning: A Contest Summary","authors":"Lei Fu, Yanxiang Yu, Chicheng Xu, Michael Ashby, Andrew McDonald, Wen Pan, Tianqi Deng, István Szabó, Pál P. Hanzelik, Csilla Kalmár, Saleh Alatwah, Jaehyuk Lee","doi":"10.30632/pjv65n1-2024a6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Well logs are processed and interpreted to estimate in-situ reservoir properties, which are essential for reservoir modeling, reserve estimation, and production forecasting. While the traditional methods are mostly based on multimineral physics or empirical formulae, machine learning provides an alternative data-driven approach that requires much less a-priori geological or petrophysical information. From October 2021 to March 2022, the Petrophysical Data-Driven Analytics Special Interest Group (PDDA SIG) of the Society of Petrophysicists and Well Log Analysts (SPWLA) hosted a machine-learning contest aiming to develop data-driven models for estimating reservoir properties, including shale volume, porosity, and fluid saturation, based on a common set of well logs, including gamma ray, bulk density, neutron porosity, resistivity, and sonic. Log data from nine wells from the same field, together with the interpreted reservoir properties by petrophysicists, were provided as training data, and five additional wells were provided as blind test data. During the contest, various data-driven models were developed by the contestants to predict the three reservoir properties with the provided training data set. The top five performing models from the contest, on average, beat the performance of the benchmarked Random Forest model by 45% in the root-mean-square error (RMSE) score. In the paper, we will review these top-performing solutions, including their preprocessing techniques, feature engineering, and machine-learning models, and summarize their advantages and conditions.","PeriodicalId":170688,"journal":{"name":"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description","volume":"21 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30632/pjv65n1-2024a6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Well logs are processed and interpreted to estimate in-situ reservoir properties, which are essential for reservoir modeling, reserve estimation, and production forecasting. While the traditional methods are mostly based on multimineral physics or empirical formulae, machine learning provides an alternative data-driven approach that requires much less a-priori geological or petrophysical information. From October 2021 to March 2022, the Petrophysical Data-Driven Analytics Special Interest Group (PDDA SIG) of the Society of Petrophysicists and Well Log Analysts (SPWLA) hosted a machine-learning contest aiming to develop data-driven models for estimating reservoir properties, including shale volume, porosity, and fluid saturation, based on a common set of well logs, including gamma ray, bulk density, neutron porosity, resistivity, and sonic. Log data from nine wells from the same field, together with the interpreted reservoir properties by petrophysicists, were provided as training data, and five additional wells were provided as blind test data. During the contest, various data-driven models were developed by the contestants to predict the three reservoir properties with the provided training data set. The top five performing models from the contest, on average, beat the performance of the benchmarked Random Forest model by 45% in the root-mean-square error (RMSE) score. In the paper, we will review these top-performing solutions, including their preprocessing techniques, feature engineering, and machine-learning models, and summarize their advantages and conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于井志的储层属性机器学习估算:竞赛总结
通过处理和解释测井记录来估算原位储层属性,这对于储层建模、储量估算和产量预测至关重要。传统方法大多基于多矿物物理学或经验公式,而机器学习则提供了另一种数据驱动方法,对地质或岩石物理信息的先验要求要低得多。从 2021 年 10 月到 2022 年 3 月,美国岩石物理学家和测井分析师协会(SPWLA)的岩石物理数据驱动分析特别兴趣小组(PDDA SIG)举办了一次机器学习竞赛,旨在开发数据驱动模型,根据一套通用的测井记录(包括伽马射线、体积密度、中子孔隙度、电阻率和声波)估算储层属性,包括页岩体积、孔隙度和流体饱和度。来自同一油田九口油井的测井数据以及岩石物理学家解释的储层属性被作为训练数据提供,另外五口油井被作为盲测数据提供。比赛期间,参赛者开发了各种数据驱动模型,利用提供的训练数据集预测三种储层属性。比赛中表现最好的五个模型在均方根误差 (RMSE) 分数上平均比基准随机森林模型高出 45%。在本文中,我们将回顾这些表现最佳的解决方案,包括它们的预处理技术、特征工程和机器学习模型,并总结它们的优势和条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automatic Geological Facies Analysis in Crust-Mantle Transition Zone Petrophysical Analyses for Supporting the Search for a Claystone-Hosted Nuclear Repository A New R35 and Fractal Joint Rock Typing Method Using MICP Analysis: A Case Study in Middle East Iraq Nuclear Logging in Geological Probing for a Low-Carbon Energy Future – A New Frontier? Underground Hydrogen Storage in Porous Media: The Potential Role of Petrophysics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1