Fostering Oral Chemotherapy Understanding and Safety (FOCUS) Project: Interventions for Improving Knowledge and Compliance With National Safety Standards

Jessica MacIntyre, DNP, MBA, APRN, NP-C, AOCNP, Rita D'Aoust, PhD, MS, RN, Deborah Baker, DNP, CRNP, NEA-BC, Ginger Hanson, PhD, MS, Lauren Gjolaj, RN, MBA, Lawrence Negret, MD, Daniel O'Neil, MD
{"title":"Fostering Oral Chemotherapy Understanding and Safety (FOCUS) Project: Interventions for Improving Knowledge and Compliance With National Safety Standards","authors":"Jessica MacIntyre, DNP, MBA, APRN, NP-C, AOCNP, Rita D'Aoust, PhD, MS, RN, Deborah Baker, DNP, CRNP, NEA-BC, Ginger Hanson, PhD, MS, Lauren Gjolaj, RN, MBA, Lawrence Negret, MD, Daniel O'Neil, MD","doi":"10.6004/jadpro.2024.15.8.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Oral chemotherapy drug development and use has increased, and evidence in the literature suggests variability in practices nationally. Thus, there is a need for continuous review of the process of oral chemotherapy administration that focuses on improving adherence to national standards. Objectives: This quality improvement project evaluated provider and staff general knowledge on oral chemotherapy and national safety standards and the implementation and ease of use of an electronic medical record (EMR)-integrated chemotherapy documentation template geared toward improving compliance with national chemotherapy administration standards. Methods: This project utilized a pre-test and post-test design comparing provider and staff knowledge as well as the intervention of a chemotherapy documentation template to assess compliance with national chemotherapy administration safety standards in an academic medical center. Through chart review, 24 national safety standards relevant to oral chemotherapy administration were used to assess compliance prior to and following the introduction of the intervention. Additionally, feasibility, accessibility, and usability of the intervention were evaluated through a validated questionnaire. Findings: Knowledge gained from pre-test to post-test improved (p value of < .001). Additionally, from the 88 charts reviewed, there was a statistical improvement in compliance with national safety standards (p value of < .001). The participants (n = 29) scored the documentation template as above average, indicating overall ease of use and feasibility for continued use.","PeriodicalId":17176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology","volume":"13 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jadpro.2024.15.8.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oral chemotherapy drug development and use has increased, and evidence in the literature suggests variability in practices nationally. Thus, there is a need for continuous review of the process of oral chemotherapy administration that focuses on improving adherence to national standards. Objectives: This quality improvement project evaluated provider and staff general knowledge on oral chemotherapy and national safety standards and the implementation and ease of use of an electronic medical record (EMR)-integrated chemotherapy documentation template geared toward improving compliance with national chemotherapy administration standards. Methods: This project utilized a pre-test and post-test design comparing provider and staff knowledge as well as the intervention of a chemotherapy documentation template to assess compliance with national chemotherapy administration safety standards in an academic medical center. Through chart review, 24 national safety standards relevant to oral chemotherapy administration were used to assess compliance prior to and following the introduction of the intervention. Additionally, feasibility, accessibility, and usability of the intervention were evaluated through a validated questionnaire. Findings: Knowledge gained from pre-test to post-test improved (p value of < .001). Additionally, from the 88 charts reviewed, there was a statistical improvement in compliance with national safety standards (p value of < .001). The participants (n = 29) scored the documentation template as above average, indicating overall ease of use and feasibility for continued use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进口服化疗理解和安全(FOCUS)项目:提高对国家安全标准的认识和遵守情况的干预措施
背景:口服化疗药物的开发和使用日益增多,而文献证据表明,各国的做法不尽相同。因此,有必要对口服化疗药物的给药过程进行持续审查,重点关注如何更好地遵守国家标准。目标:该质量改进项目评估了医疗服务提供者和工作人员对口服化疗和国家安全标准的一般知识,以及电子病历(EMR)集成化疗文件模板的实施和易用性,旨在改善对国家化疗管理标准的遵守情况。方法:该项目采用了前测和后测设计,比较了医疗服务提供者和工作人员的知识以及化疗文件模板的干预情况,以评估一家学术医疗中心是否符合国家化疗管理安全标准。通过病历审查,24 项与口服化疗用药相关的国家安全标准被用于评估干预措施引入前后的合规性。此外,还通过一份经过验证的调查问卷对干预措施的可行性、可及性和可用性进行了评估。研究结果从测试前到测试后,获得的知识有所增加(P 值小于 0.001)。此外,从查阅的 88 份病历来看,在遵守国家安全标准方面有了明显改善(P 值小于 0.001)。参与者(n = 29)对文件模板的评分高于平均水平,这表明该模板总体上易于使用,并具有持续使用的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Multiple Myeloma: A Call to Action A Real-World Evidence Primer for Advanced Practice Providers: Integrating P-Reality X Into Shared Decision-Making for People With HR+/HER2− Metastatic Breast Cancer Impact of an Oncology Clinical Pharmacist Intervention on Clinical Trial Enrollment in The US Oncology Network’s MYLUNG Consortium Beyond Standard Endocrine Therapy: A New Adjuvant Treatment in High-Risk Early Breast Cancer Evaluating the User-Perceived Benefit of a Virtual Lung Cancer Patient Education and Support Community: LVNG With Lung Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1