Systematic review of epidemiological and toxicological evidence on health effects of fluoride in drinking water.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Critical Reviews in Toxicology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1080/10408444.2023.2295338
Mohamed Kadry Taher, Franco Momoli, Jennifer Go, Shintaro Hagiwara, Siva Ramoju, Xuefeng Hu, Natalie Jensen, Rowan Terrell, Alex Hemmerich, Daniel Krewski
{"title":"Systematic review of epidemiological and toxicological evidence on health effects of fluoride in drinking water.","authors":"Mohamed Kadry Taher, Franco Momoli, Jennifer Go, Shintaro Hagiwara, Siva Ramoju, Xuefeng Hu, Natalie Jensen, Rowan Terrell, Alex Hemmerich, Daniel Krewski","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2295338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fluoride is a naturally occurring substance that is also added to drinking water, dental hygiene products, and food supplements for preventing dental caries. Concerns have been raised about several other potential health risks of fluoride.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a robust synthesis of evidence regarding human health risks due to exposure to fluoride in drinking water, and to develop a point of departure (POD) for setting a health-based value (HBV) for fluoride in drinking water.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of evidence published since recent reviews of human, animal, and <i>in vitro</i> data was carried out. Bradford Hill considerations were used to weigh the evidence for causality. Several key studies were considered for deriving PODs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The current review identified 89 human studies, 199 animal studies, and 10 major <i>in vitro</i> reviews. The weight of evidence on 39 health endpoints was presented. In addition to dental fluorosis, evidence was considered strong for reduction in IQ scores in children, moderate for thyroid dysfunction, weak for kidney dysfunction, and limited for sex hormone disruptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current review identified moderate dental fluorosis and reduction in IQ scores in children as the most relevant endpoints for establishing an HBV for fluoride in drinking water. PODs were derived for these two endpoints, although there is still some uncertainty in the causal weight of evidence for causality for reducing IQ scores in children and considerable uncertainty in the derivation of its POD. Given our evaluation of the overall weight of evidence, moderate dental fluorosis is suggested as the key endpoint until more evidence is accumulated on possible reduction of IQ scores effects. A POD of 1.56 mg fluoride/L for moderate dental fluorosis may be preferred as a starting point for setting an HBV for fluoride in drinking water to protect against moderate and severe dental fluorosis. Although outside the scope of the current review, precautionary concerns for potential neurodevelopmental cognitive effects may warrant special consideration in the derivation of the HBV for fluoride in drinking water.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"2-34"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2023.2295338","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Fluoride is a naturally occurring substance that is also added to drinking water, dental hygiene products, and food supplements for preventing dental caries. Concerns have been raised about several other potential health risks of fluoride.

Objective: To conduct a robust synthesis of evidence regarding human health risks due to exposure to fluoride in drinking water, and to develop a point of departure (POD) for setting a health-based value (HBV) for fluoride in drinking water.

Methods: A systematic review of evidence published since recent reviews of human, animal, and in vitro data was carried out. Bradford Hill considerations were used to weigh the evidence for causality. Several key studies were considered for deriving PODs.

Results: The current review identified 89 human studies, 199 animal studies, and 10 major in vitro reviews. The weight of evidence on 39 health endpoints was presented. In addition to dental fluorosis, evidence was considered strong for reduction in IQ scores in children, moderate for thyroid dysfunction, weak for kidney dysfunction, and limited for sex hormone disruptions.

Conclusion: The current review identified moderate dental fluorosis and reduction in IQ scores in children as the most relevant endpoints for establishing an HBV for fluoride in drinking water. PODs were derived for these two endpoints, although there is still some uncertainty in the causal weight of evidence for causality for reducing IQ scores in children and considerable uncertainty in the derivation of its POD. Given our evaluation of the overall weight of evidence, moderate dental fluorosis is suggested as the key endpoint until more evidence is accumulated on possible reduction of IQ scores effects. A POD of 1.56 mg fluoride/L for moderate dental fluorosis may be preferred as a starting point for setting an HBV for fluoride in drinking water to protect against moderate and severe dental fluorosis. Although outside the scope of the current review, precautionary concerns for potential neurodevelopmental cognitive effects may warrant special consideration in the derivation of the HBV for fluoride in drinking water.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于饮用水中氟化物对健康影响的流行病学和毒理学证据的系统回顾。
简介:氟是一种天然物质,也被添加到饮用水、牙科卫生产品和食品补充剂中,用于预防龋齿。人们对氟的其他几种潜在健康风险表示担忧:对有关接触饮用水中的氟对人体健康造成危害的证据进行可靠的综述,并为设定饮用水中氟的健康值(HBV)制定一个出发点(POD):方法:对近期人类、动物和体外数据审查以来发表的证据进行了系统性审查。布拉德福德-希尔(Bradford Hill)考虑因素用于权衡因果关系的证据。在得出 POD 时考虑了几项关键研究:目前的审查确定了 89 项人类研究、199 项动物研究和 10 项主要的体外审查。报告介绍了 39 个健康终点的证据权重。除氟斑牙外,儿童智商下降的证据被认为是有力的,甲状腺功能障碍的证据被认为是中等的,肾功能障碍的证据被认为是微弱的,性激素紊乱的证据被认为是有限的:目前的综述认为,中度氟斑牙和儿童智商下降是确定饮用水中氟的 HBV 的最相关终点。尽管儿童智商下降的因果关系证据权重仍存在一定的不确定性,其 POD 的推导也存在相当大的不确定性,但还是得出了这两个终点的 POD。鉴于我们对总体证据权重的评估,建议将中度氟斑牙作为关键终点,直到积累了更多关于可能降低智商分数效应的证据。中度氟斑牙的 POD 值为 1.56 毫克氟/升,以此为起点来设定饮用水中氟的 HBV 值,以防止中度和重度氟斑牙。尽管不在本次审查的范围之内,但在推导饮用水中氟的 HBV 值时,可能需要特别考虑对潜在神经发育认知影响的预防性关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
1.70%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Toxicology provides up-to-date, objective analyses of topics related to the mechanisms of action, responses, and assessment of health risks due to toxicant exposure. The journal publishes critical, comprehensive reviews of research findings in toxicology and the application of toxicological information in assessing human health hazards and risks. Toxicants of concern include commodity and specialty chemicals such as formaldehyde, acrylonitrile, and pesticides; pharmaceutical agents of all types; consumer products such as macronutrients and food additives; environmental agents such as ambient ozone; and occupational exposures such as asbestos and benzene.
期刊最新文献
Xylene: weight of evidence approach case study to determine the need for an extended one generation reproductive study with a developmental neurotoxicity animal cohort. A critical review to identify data gaps and improve risk assessment of bisphenol A alternatives for human health. Review of epidemiological and toxicological studies on health effects from ingestion of asbestos in drinking water. Objective causal predictions from observational data. Mode of action of dieldrin-induced liver tumors: application to human risk assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1