Respiratory Muscle Strength Is Related to Handgrip Performance in Community-Dwelling Persons Aged 80+ from the BUTTERFLY Study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Gerontology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-05 DOI:10.1159/000536361
Lisa Dreessen, Aziz Debain, Siddhartha Lieten, Bert Bravenboer, Sofie Vermeiren, Roberta Vella-Azzopardi, Veerle Knoop, Axelle Costenoble, Celeste Smeys, Rock-Ange Iranyeza, Kristof E Y Van der Meulen, Eef Vanderhelst, Daniel Schuermans, Ivan Bautmans
{"title":"Respiratory Muscle Strength Is Related to Handgrip Performance in Community-Dwelling Persons Aged 80+ from the BUTTERFLY Study.","authors":"Lisa Dreessen, Aziz Debain, Siddhartha Lieten, Bert Bravenboer, Sofie Vermeiren, Roberta Vella-Azzopardi, Veerle Knoop, Axelle Costenoble, Celeste Smeys, Rock-Ange Iranyeza, Kristof E Y Van der Meulen, Eef Vanderhelst, Daniel Schuermans, Ivan Bautmans","doi":"10.1159/000536361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the association of respiratory muscle strength with sarcopenia and its indicators in the oldest old.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), and sarcopenia-related factors (handgrip strength and appendicular lean mass) were evaluated in a cohort of n = 286 (45.5% female) non-frail, community-dwelling persons aged 83.6 ± 3.0 years (age range 80-97 years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample presented a sarcopenia prevalence of 32.2%. Sarcopenic subjects showed comparable MIP and MEP as non-sarcopenic ones (female: MIP 43.9 ± 18.9 vs. 50.3 ± 19.5, p = 0.053; MEP 63.0 ± 23.0 vs. 69.2 ± 19.1, p = 0.067; male: MIP, 65.1 ± 24.4 vs. 64.4 ± 23.9, p = 0.433; MEP 87.7 ± 33.3 vs. 93.8 ± 30.9, p = 0.124). Statistically significant but very low associations were found between grip strength and MIP (r = 0.193 for male, p &lt; 0.05 and r = 0.257 for female participants, p &lt; 0.01) and MEP (r = 0.200 for male, p &lt; 0.01 and r = 0.191 for female participants, p &lt; 0.05). Lean mass was significantly correlated to MIP and MEP in female (r = 0.253, p &lt; 0.01 and r = 0.343, p &lt; 0.01, respectively), whereas this association was not found in male participants. Grip strength was the only statistically significant predictor of MEP (r2 = 0.212, p &lt; 0.001), while MIP was independently predicted by age, male sex, and grip strength (r2 = 0.177, p &lt; 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Peripheral muscle strength is a statistically significant, albeit weak predictor for respiratory muscle strength in well-functioning, community-dwelling persons aged 80+. When confronted to a low grip strength, one should be aware of concomitant respiratory muscle weakness, as this is a known risk factor for atelectasis and pneumonia. Given the relatively low association with handgrip strength, respiratory muscle strength testing might be indicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":12662,"journal":{"name":"Gerontology","volume":" ","pages":"526-535"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000536361","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the association of respiratory muscle strength with sarcopenia and its indicators in the oldest old.

Methods: Maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), and sarcopenia-related factors (handgrip strength and appendicular lean mass) were evaluated in a cohort of n = 286 (45.5% female) non-frail, community-dwelling persons aged 83.6 ± 3.0 years (age range 80-97 years).

Results: The sample presented a sarcopenia prevalence of 32.2%. Sarcopenic subjects showed comparable MIP and MEP as non-sarcopenic ones (female: MIP 43.9 ± 18.9 vs. 50.3 ± 19.5, p = 0.053; MEP 63.0 ± 23.0 vs. 69.2 ± 19.1, p = 0.067; male: MIP, 65.1 ± 24.4 vs. 64.4 ± 23.9, p = 0.433; MEP 87.7 ± 33.3 vs. 93.8 ± 30.9, p = 0.124). Statistically significant but very low associations were found between grip strength and MIP (r = 0.193 for male, p < 0.05 and r = 0.257 for female participants, p < 0.01) and MEP (r = 0.200 for male, p < 0.01 and r = 0.191 for female participants, p < 0.05). Lean mass was significantly correlated to MIP and MEP in female (r = 0.253, p < 0.01 and r = 0.343, p < 0.01, respectively), whereas this association was not found in male participants. Grip strength was the only statistically significant predictor of MEP (r2 = 0.212, p < 0.001), while MIP was independently predicted by age, male sex, and grip strength (r2 = 0.177, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Peripheral muscle strength is a statistically significant, albeit weak predictor for respiratory muscle strength in well-functioning, community-dwelling persons aged 80+. When confronted to a low grip strength, one should be aware of concomitant respiratory muscle weakness, as this is a known risk factor for atelectasis and pneumonia. Given the relatively low association with handgrip strength, respiratory muscle strength testing might be indicated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BUTTERFLY研究中80岁以上社区居民的呼吸肌力量与手握能力的关系。
简介:本研究旨在评估老年人呼吸肌力量与肌肉疏松症及其指标的关系:本研究旨在评估老年人呼吸肌力量与肌肉疏松症及其指标的关系:方法:对一组年龄为 83.6±3.0 岁(年龄范围为 80-97 岁)、居住在社区的非体弱者样本(286 人,其中女性占 45.5%)中的最大吸气压力(MIP)、最大呼气压力(MEP)和肌肉疏松症相关因素(手握力和关节瘦体重)进行评估:结果:样本中肌肉疏松症的发病率为 32.2%。肌少症患者的 MIP 和 MEP 与非肌少症患者相当(女性:MIP 43.9±18.0;男性:MIP 43.9±18.0;女性:MIP 43.9±18.0):MIP:43.9±18.9 对 50.3±19.5,p=0.053;MEP:63.0±23.0 对 69.2±19.1,p=0.067;男性:MIP:65.1±24.4 对 64.4±23.9,p=0.433;MEP:87.7±33.3 对 93.8±30.9,p=0.124)。在握力和 MIP 之间发现了有统计学意义但非常低的关联(男性 r=0,193, p结论:在统计意义上,外周肌力对功能良好、居住在社区的 80 岁以上老年人的呼吸肌力有显著的预测作用,尽管这种作用很弱。当面对握力较低时,应注意同时存在的呼吸肌无力,因为这是导致肺不张和肺炎的已知风险因素。鉴于握力与呼吸肌力的关联性相对较低,可能需要进行呼吸肌力测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontology
Gerontology 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In view of the ever-increasing fraction of elderly people, understanding the mechanisms of aging and age-related diseases has become a matter of urgent necessity. ''Gerontology'', the oldest journal in the field, responds to this need by drawing topical contributions from multiple disciplines to support the fundamental goals of extending active life and enhancing its quality. The range of papers is classified into four sections. In the Clinical Section, the aetiology, pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of agerelated diseases are discussed from a gerontological rather than a geriatric viewpoint. The Experimental Section contains up-to-date contributions from basic gerontological research. Papers dealing with behavioural development and related topics are placed in the Behavioural Science Section. Basic aspects of regeneration in different experimental biological systems as well as in the context of medical applications are dealt with in a special section that also contains information on technological advances for the elderly. Providing a primary source of high-quality papers covering all aspects of aging in humans and animals, ''Gerontology'' serves as an ideal information tool for all readers interested in the topic of aging from a broad perspective.
期刊最新文献
Chronic Nf-κB Inhibition Prevents Experimental Aging Nephropathy. Does the digital divide accelerate cognitive function decline related to the poor management of diabetes in later life? Views of aging and subjective cognition in middle-aged and older adults: A systematic review. Age-Related Hearing Loss: A cross-sectional study of healthy older Australians. Association between serum albumin to creatinine ratio and readmission in elderly heart failure patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1