Moral sensitivity and academic ethical awareness of nursing and medical students: A cross-sectional survey.

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Nursing Ethics Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-05 DOI:10.1177/09697330241226604
Yuet Kiu Ko, Cordelia Cho, Sihan Sun, Olivia My Ngan, Helen Yl Chan
{"title":"Moral sensitivity and academic ethical awareness of nursing and medical students: A cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Yuet Kiu Ko, Cordelia Cho, Sihan Sun, Olivia My Ngan, Helen Yl Chan","doi":"10.1177/09697330241226604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Moral sensitivity and academic integrity discernment hold paramount importance for healthcare professionals. Owing to distinct undergraduate educational backgrounds, nurses and physicians may exhibit divergent moral perspectives, academic integrity cognisance, and moral sensitivity within clinical environments. A limited number of studies have investigated the disparities and congruencies pertaining to moral sensitivity and academic ethical awareness among nursing and medical students.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study compares moral sensitivity and academic ethical awareness of undergraduate nursing and medical students with and without clinical exposure.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>A self-administered cross-sectional survey conducted from January to February 2022 was used to collect data from a medical school in Hong Kong.</p><p><strong>Participants and research context: </strong>A total of 545 respondents, including 137 nursing students and 408 medical students, completed the questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Ethical consideration: </strong>Ethics approval of the study was obtained. Written consent was waived to maintain anonymity because completing the questionnaire was considered implied consent.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Both groups of undergraduates demonstrated a high level of bioethics knowledge. In terms of academic integrity, medical students were found to have a less concerned attitude towards punctuality, attendance, and skipping classes. Regarding moral sensitivity, senior medical students with clinical experience put less emphasis on decision-making involving patient participation, while senior nursing students were more hesitant in withholding treatment for incompetent patients who refused treatment. Both nursing and medical students showed decreased moral sensitivity in the 'conflicts' domain with increased clinical exposure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Study findings contribute to the discussion comparing the ethical attitudes of nursing and medical students. More effort should be made in nursing and medical education to promote practices in line with high academic integrity and to develop the ability to be morally sensitive in professional settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"1499-1512"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241226604","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Moral sensitivity and academic integrity discernment hold paramount importance for healthcare professionals. Owing to distinct undergraduate educational backgrounds, nurses and physicians may exhibit divergent moral perspectives, academic integrity cognisance, and moral sensitivity within clinical environments. A limited number of studies have investigated the disparities and congruencies pertaining to moral sensitivity and academic ethical awareness among nursing and medical students.

Objective: The study compares moral sensitivity and academic ethical awareness of undergraduate nursing and medical students with and without clinical exposure.

Research design: A self-administered cross-sectional survey conducted from January to February 2022 was used to collect data from a medical school in Hong Kong.

Participants and research context: A total of 545 respondents, including 137 nursing students and 408 medical students, completed the questionnaire.

Ethical consideration: Ethics approval of the study was obtained. Written consent was waived to maintain anonymity because completing the questionnaire was considered implied consent.

Findings: Both groups of undergraduates demonstrated a high level of bioethics knowledge. In terms of academic integrity, medical students were found to have a less concerned attitude towards punctuality, attendance, and skipping classes. Regarding moral sensitivity, senior medical students with clinical experience put less emphasis on decision-making involving patient participation, while senior nursing students were more hesitant in withholding treatment for incompetent patients who refused treatment. Both nursing and medical students showed decreased moral sensitivity in the 'conflicts' domain with increased clinical exposure.

Conclusion: Study findings contribute to the discussion comparing the ethical attitudes of nursing and medical students. More effort should be made in nursing and medical education to promote practices in line with high academic integrity and to develop the ability to be morally sensitive in professional settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理专业学生和医科学生的道德敏感性和学术伦理意识:横断面调查。
背景:道德敏感性和学术诚信辨别力对医护人员至关重要。由于本科教育背景不同,护士和医生在临床环境中可能会表现出不同的道德观点、学术诚信认知和道德敏感性。对护理专业学生和医科学生在道德敏感性和学术道德意识方面的差异和一致性进行调查的研究数量有限:本研究比较了护理本科生和医科本科生在接触临床和未接触临床时的道德敏感性和学术道德意识:研究设计:于 2022 年 1 月至 2 月在香港一所医学院进行了一项自填式横断面调查,以收集数据:共有545名受访者填写了问卷,其中包括137名护理专业学生和408名医科学生:研究已获得伦理批准。为保持匿名性,放弃了书面同意,因为填写问卷被视为默示同意:两组大学生都表现出较高的生物伦理知识水平。在学术诚信方面,医科学生对守时、出勤和逃课的关注度较低。在道德敏感性方面,有临床经验的高年级医科学生不太重视涉及病人参与的决策,而高年级护理专业学生在拒绝治疗无行为能力的病人时更犹豫不决。随着临床经验的增加,护理专业学生和医科学生在 "冲突 "领域的道德敏感性都有所下降:研究结果有助于比较护理专业学生和医科学生的道德态度。在护理和医学教育中应做出更多努力,促进符合高学术诚信的实践,并培养学生在专业环境中的道德敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
期刊最新文献
Sources of moral distress in nursing professionals: A scoping review. Truth-telling, and ethical considerations in terminal care: an Eastern perspective. Ethical considerations in the UK-Nepal nurse recruitment: Nepali nurses' perspectives. Nurses on the outside, problems on the inside! The duty of nurses to support unions. Care and justice reasoning in nurses' everyday ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1