Private health insurance incentives and passive adverse selection: is Lifetime Health Cover responsible for the excess ageing of Australia's hospital cover risk pool?

Jonathon Bruce Ryan
{"title":"Private health insurance incentives and passive adverse selection: is Lifetime Health Cover responsible for the excess ageing of Australia's hospital cover risk pool?","authors":"Jonathon Bruce Ryan","doi":"10.1071/AH23228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective Lifetime Health Cover (LHC) was introduced in mid-2000 to increase participation in private health insurance that includes hospital cover (PHI-HC) and improve the risk profile of PHI-HC participants. It initially achieved both objectives, but since 2001 the PHI-HC population has aged faster than the general population. The aim of this study was to determine if the excess ageing of the PHI-HC risk pool has been due to passive age-based adverse selection, an inherent risk of LHC. This study has potential implications for the retention of LHC. Methods A descriptive population-level analysis of publicly available administrative datasets was performed. Data relating to PHI-HC were obtained from the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority. National population data were obtained from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. Trends in demography, PHI-HC participation rates and LHC loading payments were analysed. Results By 2021, age-based adverse selection had returned to the pre-LHC level. Based on the available data, this was due to passive age-based adverse selection not active age-based adverse selection. Specifically, it reflected the combination of an avoidable unintended consequence of the introduction of LHC (the over-representation, in 2001, of individuals aged 45-59) and one of LHC's intended effects (incentivisation of insured individuals to retain PHI-HC). Conclusions This study supports the retention of LHC. Nonetheless, it highlights the risk of passive age-based adverse selection created by incentivising insured individuals to retain PHI-HC in the presence of distortions in the age distribution of the PHI-HC risk pool. Early targeted interventions are required when such distortions arise.</p>","PeriodicalId":93891,"journal":{"name":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","volume":" ","pages":"262-268"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH23228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Lifetime Health Cover (LHC) was introduced in mid-2000 to increase participation in private health insurance that includes hospital cover (PHI-HC) and improve the risk profile of PHI-HC participants. It initially achieved both objectives, but since 2001 the PHI-HC population has aged faster than the general population. The aim of this study was to determine if the excess ageing of the PHI-HC risk pool has been due to passive age-based adverse selection, an inherent risk of LHC. This study has potential implications for the retention of LHC. Methods A descriptive population-level analysis of publicly available administrative datasets was performed. Data relating to PHI-HC were obtained from the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority. National population data were obtained from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. Trends in demography, PHI-HC participation rates and LHC loading payments were analysed. Results By 2021, age-based adverse selection had returned to the pre-LHC level. Based on the available data, this was due to passive age-based adverse selection not active age-based adverse selection. Specifically, it reflected the combination of an avoidable unintended consequence of the introduction of LHC (the over-representation, in 2001, of individuals aged 45-59) and one of LHC's intended effects (incentivisation of insured individuals to retain PHI-HC). Conclusions This study supports the retention of LHC. Nonetheless, it highlights the risk of passive age-based adverse selection created by incentivising insured individuals to retain PHI-HC in the presence of distortions in the age distribution of the PHI-HC risk pool. Early targeted interventions are required when such distortions arise.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
私人医疗保险的激励机制和被动逆向选择:终身医疗保险是否是澳大利亚医院保险风险池过度老龄化的原因?
目标终身健康保险(LHC)于 2000 年年中推出,旨在提高包括医院保险在内的私人健康保险(PHI-HC)的参与率,并改善 PHI-HC 参与者的风险状况。它最初实现了这两个目标,但自 2001 年以来,私人医疗保险-健康保险参保者的老龄化速度快于普通人群。本研究的目的是确定 PHI-HC 风险库的过度老龄化是否是由于基于年龄的被动逆向选择造成的,这是长期健康保险的固有风险。本研究对保留 LHC 有潜在影响。与 PHI-HC 相关的数据来自澳大利亚审慎监管局(Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority)。全国人口数据来自澳大利亚统计局。结果到 2021 年,基于年龄的逆向选择已恢复到低保前的水平。根据现有数据,这是由于被动的年龄逆向选择而非主动的年龄逆向选择造成的。具体来说,这反映了引入长期健康保险的一个本可避免的意外后果(2001 年 45-59 岁人群的比例过高)和长期健康保险的一个预期效果(激励投保人保留 PHI-HC)。尽管如此,该研究强调了在 PHI-HC 风险池年龄分布扭曲的情况下,通过激励投保人保留 PHI-HC 而产生的基于年龄的被动逆向选择风险。当出现这种扭曲时,需要及早采取有针对性的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Australia's research investment in the health of justice-involved populations. Pilot testing of the Research Impact Assessment Framework. The influence of specialty training selection criteria on medical students' career pathway choices in Australia. Integrating cybersecurity into healthcare quality governance: a policy perspective on artificial intelligence risks in Australia. Consumer involvement enhances allergy research: a National Allergy Centre of Excellence Consumer Engagement Framework.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1