Interoception as a function of hypnotizability during rest and a heartbeat counting task.

Psychophysiology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1111/psyp.14535
Gioia Giusti, Žan Zelič, Alejandro Luis Callara, Laura Sebastiani, Enrica L Santarcangelo
{"title":"Interoception as a function of hypnotizability during rest and a heartbeat counting task.","authors":"Gioia Giusti, Žan Zelič, Alejandro Luis Callara, Laura Sebastiani, Enrica L Santarcangelo","doi":"10.1111/psyp.14535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The hypnotizability-related differences in morpho-functional characteristics of the insula could at least partially account for the differences in interoceptive accuracy (IA) observed between high and low hypnotizable individuals (highs, lows). Our aim was to investigate interoceptive processing in highs, lows, and medium hypnotizable individuals (mediums), who represent most of the population, during a 10-minute open eyes relaxation condition (Part 1) and three repetitions of consecutive 2-minute open eyes, closed eyes, and heartbeat counting conditions, followed by a 2-minute post-counting condition (Part 2). Electrocardiogram and electroencephalogram were recorded in 14 highs, 14 mediums, and 18 lows, classified according to the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale: Form A. Heartbeat-evoked cortical potentials (HEP) were extracted throughout the entire session, and IA index was obtained for the heartbeat counting task (HCT). In Part 1, significant hypnotizability-related differences were observed in the right central region in both early and late HEP components, with lows showing positive amplitudes and highs/mediums showing negative amplitudes. In Part 2, the same group differences were limited to the early component. Moreover, in the left frontal regions, only mediums modified their HEP during the counting task with respect to the open/closed eyes conditions, whereas highs displayed HEP differences between counting and post-counting rest. HCT did not show significant group differences. In conclusion, highs and mediums seem to be more similar than mediums and lows regarding HEP, despite the absence of significant differences in HCT. Nonetheless, a negative correlation between hypnotizability scores and HEP amplitudes was observed in the regions showing group differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":94182,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The hypnotizability-related differences in morpho-functional characteristics of the insula could at least partially account for the differences in interoceptive accuracy (IA) observed between high and low hypnotizable individuals (highs, lows). Our aim was to investigate interoceptive processing in highs, lows, and medium hypnotizable individuals (mediums), who represent most of the population, during a 10-minute open eyes relaxation condition (Part 1) and three repetitions of consecutive 2-minute open eyes, closed eyes, and heartbeat counting conditions, followed by a 2-minute post-counting condition (Part 2). Electrocardiogram and electroencephalogram were recorded in 14 highs, 14 mediums, and 18 lows, classified according to the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale: Form A. Heartbeat-evoked cortical potentials (HEP) were extracted throughout the entire session, and IA index was obtained for the heartbeat counting task (HCT). In Part 1, significant hypnotizability-related differences were observed in the right central region in both early and late HEP components, with lows showing positive amplitudes and highs/mediums showing negative amplitudes. In Part 2, the same group differences were limited to the early component. Moreover, in the left frontal regions, only mediums modified their HEP during the counting task with respect to the open/closed eyes conditions, whereas highs displayed HEP differences between counting and post-counting rest. HCT did not show significant group differences. In conclusion, highs and mediums seem to be more similar than mediums and lows regarding HEP, despite the absence of significant differences in HCT. Nonetheless, a negative correlation between hypnotizability scores and HEP amplitudes was observed in the regions showing group differences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在休息和心跳计数任务中,交互感知是催眠性的函数。
与催眠能力相关的脑岛形态功能特征差异至少可以部分解释高催眠能力者和低催眠能力者(高催眠能力者和低催眠能力者)之间在感知间准确性(IA)上的差异。我们的目的是在 10 分钟睁眼放松条件(第一部分)和三次连续 2 分钟睁眼、闭眼和心跳计数条件(第二部分)中,研究高、低和中等催眠能力者(中等)的内感知处理过程。根据斯坦福催眠易感性量表,记录了 14 个高分、14 个中分和 18 个低分的心电图和脑电图:在整个疗程中提取了心跳诱发皮层电位(HEP),并在心跳计数任务(HCT)中获得了 IA 指数。在第一部分中,在右中央区的早期和晚期 HEP 成分中观察到了与催眠相关的显著差异,低频呈正振幅,高频/中频呈负振幅。在第二部分中,同样的群体差异仅限于早期成分。此外,在左额叶区域,只有中位数在计数任务中改变了睁眼/闭眼条件下的 HEP,而高位数在计数和计数后休息时显示出 HEP 差异。HCT 并未显示出明显的组间差异。总之,在 HEP 方面,高分者和中等者似乎比中等者和低分者更相似,尽管在 HCT 方面没有显著差异。然而,在出现组间差异的区域,催眠性评分与 HEP 振幅之间存在负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How effort-based self-interest motivation shapes altruistic donation behavior and brain responses. Beyond peaks and troughs: Multiplexed performance monitoring signals in the EEG. Reduced reward responsiveness and depression vulnerability: Consideration of social contexts and implications for intervention. Moving toward reality: Electrocortical reactivity to naturalistic multimodal emotional videos. Mapping the routes of perception: Hemispheric asymmetries in signal propagation dynamics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1