Selecting repetitive focal and rotational activation patterns with the highest probability of being a source of atrial fibrillation

Ben J.M. Hermans , Ozan Özgül , Michael Wolf , Victor G. Marques , Arne van Hunnik , Sander Verheule , Sevasti-Maria Chaldoupi , Dominik Linz , Milad El Haddad , Mattias Duytschaever , Pietro Bonizzi , Kevin Vernooy , Sébastien Knecht , Stef Zeemering , Ulrich Schotten
{"title":"Selecting repetitive focal and rotational activation patterns with the highest probability of being a source of atrial fibrillation","authors":"Ben J.M. Hermans ,&nbsp;Ozan Özgül ,&nbsp;Michael Wolf ,&nbsp;Victor G. Marques ,&nbsp;Arne van Hunnik ,&nbsp;Sander Verheule ,&nbsp;Sevasti-Maria Chaldoupi ,&nbsp;Dominik Linz ,&nbsp;Milad El Haddad ,&nbsp;Mattias Duytschaever ,&nbsp;Pietro Bonizzi ,&nbsp;Kevin Vernooy ,&nbsp;Sébastien Knecht ,&nbsp;Stef Zeemering ,&nbsp;Ulrich Schotten","doi":"10.1016/j.jmccpl.2024.100064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Repetitive focal and rotational activation patterns are currently used as additional ablation targets for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there is no evidence that all these detected targets are actual sources of AF. In this paper, we present an approach that detects and ranks AF activation patterns not only based on the degree of pattern repetitiveness but also on the extent to which they are able to entrain their vicinity. This new technique might enable selecting the site with the highest probability of being a source for AF.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively analyzed high-density bi-atrial sequential mapping in ablation-naive persistent AF patients (<em>n</em> = 13, PentaRay catheter, 30s recordings). Repetitive focal and rotational activation patterns were detected based on local activation time annotation of unipolar electrograms. The spatial stability was determined as local repetitive pattern duration. The entrainment capability was defined as the average time a directionally coherent repetitive activation pattern was observed in adjacent recordings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 459 recordings were analyzed (35 ± 5 per patient). We detected 131 repetitive focal (10 ± 4 per patient) and 56 rotational activation patterns (4 ± 3 per patient) in total. Focal patterns were more repetitive than rotational patterns (median [IQR] 0.7 [0.4–1.3] seconds vs. 0.5 [0.4–0.6] seconds, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001 Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test). By applying a 90th percentile threshold to both local and directionally coherent adjacent repetitiveness, we identified 10 sites (9 focal and 1 rotational) in 7 patients as the most probable sources. The majority of these sites were in the upper right atrium or left pulmonary vein region. Notably, in 6 patients (46 %), no probable sources were detected using this threshold.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study introduces a novel technique to select the repetitive focal or rotational pattern with the highest probability of being a source. We observed that only a minority of repetitive focal or rotational patterns seem to be able to entrain their vicinity and thereby are likely to serve as sources of AF.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73835,"journal":{"name":"Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772976124000047/pdfft?md5=0afd8ea9ca216a5236a77fc3af9895c3&pid=1-s2.0-S2772976124000047-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772976124000047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Repetitive focal and rotational activation patterns are currently used as additional ablation targets for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there is no evidence that all these detected targets are actual sources of AF. In this paper, we present an approach that detects and ranks AF activation patterns not only based on the degree of pattern repetitiveness but also on the extent to which they are able to entrain their vicinity. This new technique might enable selecting the site with the highest probability of being a source for AF.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed high-density bi-atrial sequential mapping in ablation-naive persistent AF patients (n = 13, PentaRay catheter, 30s recordings). Repetitive focal and rotational activation patterns were detected based on local activation time annotation of unipolar electrograms. The spatial stability was determined as local repetitive pattern duration. The entrainment capability was defined as the average time a directionally coherent repetitive activation pattern was observed in adjacent recordings.

Results

A total of 459 recordings were analyzed (35 ± 5 per patient). We detected 131 repetitive focal (10 ± 4 per patient) and 56 rotational activation patterns (4 ± 3 per patient) in total. Focal patterns were more repetitive than rotational patterns (median [IQR] 0.7 [0.4–1.3] seconds vs. 0.5 [0.4–0.6] seconds, p < 0.001 Mann-Whitney U test). By applying a 90th percentile threshold to both local and directionally coherent adjacent repetitiveness, we identified 10 sites (9 focal and 1 rotational) in 7 patients as the most probable sources. The majority of these sites were in the upper right atrium or left pulmonary vein region. Notably, in 6 patients (46 %), no probable sources were detected using this threshold.

Conclusion

This study introduces a novel technique to select the repetitive focal or rotational pattern with the highest probability of being a source. We observed that only a minority of repetitive focal or rotational patterns seem to be able to entrain their vicinity and thereby are likely to serve as sources of AF.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择最有可能成为心房颤动源的重复性病灶和旋转激活模式
导言重复性病灶和旋转激活模式目前被用作心房颤动(房颤)的额外消融目标。然而,没有证据表明所有这些检测到的目标都是房颤的实际来源。在本文中,我们提出了一种方法,该方法不仅能根据模式的重复程度,还能根据它们能在多大程度上夹带其附近的房颤激活模式,对房颤激活模式进行检测和排序。方法我们回顾性分析了消融无效的持续性房颤患者(n = 13,PentaRay 导管,30 秒记录)的高密度双心房序列图谱。根据单极电图的局部激活时间标注,检测出重复的局灶和旋转激活模式。空间稳定性由局部重复模式持续时间决定。夹带能力的定义是在相邻记录中观察到方向一致的重复激活模式的平均时间。我们共检测到 131 个重复性病灶激活模式(每个患者 10 ± 4 个)和 56 个旋转激活模式(每个患者 4 ± 3 个)。病灶模式比旋转模式的重复性更高(中位数[IQR] 0.7 [0.4-1.3] 秒 vs. 0.5 [0.4-0.6] 秒,p < 0.001 Mann-Whitney U 检验)。通过对局部和方向相一致的相邻重复性应用第 90 百分位阈值,我们在 7 名患者中确定了 10 个部位(9 个局灶性和 1 个旋转性)为最可能的来源。这些部位大多位于右心房上部或左肺静脉区域。值得注意的是,在 6 名患者(46%)中,使用该阈值未检测到可能的来源。我们观察到,只有少数重复性病灶或旋转模式似乎能够夹带其附近的病灶或旋转模式,从而有可能成为房颤源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus
Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
31 days
期刊最新文献
Transcriptome analysis of the aortic coarctation area Conditional ablation of MCU exacerbated cardiac pathology in a genetic arrhythmic model of CPVT P-, E-, and H-cadherins differ in their relationships with coronary stenosis, cardiovascular outcomes, and unplanned recurrent revascularization Sex differences in cardiac mitochondrial respiration and reactive oxygen species production may predispose Scn1a−/+ mice to cardiac arrhythmias and Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy Cardiac overexpression of a mitochondrial SUR2A splice variant impairs cardiac function and worsens myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury in female mice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1