Deimplementation of Gastric Residual Volume Monitoring to Enhance Patient Nutrition.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical care nurse Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.4037/ccn2024937
Hannah E Landgrave
{"title":"Deimplementation of Gastric Residual Volume Monitoring to Enhance Patient Nutrition.","authors":"Hannah E Landgrave","doi":"10.4037/ccn2024937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Routine gastric residual volume monitoring remains common in nursing practice. However, current evidence supports using a focused nursing assessment to identify signs and symptoms of enteral feeding intolerance such as abdominal pain, abdominal distension, and vomiting.</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>At the author's institution, nurses and other clinicians began reporting inconsistencies in gastric residual volume monitoring along with frequent interruptions in the delivery of enteral nutrition.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The quality improvement project included patients in the medical intensive care unit receiving enteral nutrition. Gastric residual volume monitoring was eliminated. Instead, enteral nutrition was suspended on the basis of signs and symptoms of enteral feeding intolerance. Multimodal education was provided to nurses, nurse practitioners, and physicians caring for these patients. Formative evaluation occurred via staff rounds, summative evaluation occurred through a staff survey, and nutritional adequacy was evaluated by tracking patient weight.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 6-week project included 37 patients on the medical intensive care unit service. Of these patients, 28 gained weight; the mean change in weight was +6.2%. The practice change was well perceived by staff and is now an established part of care for any patient receiving enteral feedings at the study hospital.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The deimplementation of routine gastric residual volume monitoring is supported by evidence. Use of a focused gastrointestinal nursing assessment to identify enteral feeding intolerance is safe, feasible, and effective and improves nutrition delivery and nurses' workflow.</p>","PeriodicalId":10738,"journal":{"name":"Critical care nurse","volume":"44 1","pages":"34-44"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care nurse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2024937","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Routine gastric residual volume monitoring remains common in nursing practice. However, current evidence supports using a focused nursing assessment to identify signs and symptoms of enteral feeding intolerance such as abdominal pain, abdominal distension, and vomiting.

Local problem: At the author's institution, nurses and other clinicians began reporting inconsistencies in gastric residual volume monitoring along with frequent interruptions in the delivery of enteral nutrition.

Interventions: The quality improvement project included patients in the medical intensive care unit receiving enteral nutrition. Gastric residual volume monitoring was eliminated. Instead, enteral nutrition was suspended on the basis of signs and symptoms of enteral feeding intolerance. Multimodal education was provided to nurses, nurse practitioners, and physicians caring for these patients. Formative evaluation occurred via staff rounds, summative evaluation occurred through a staff survey, and nutritional adequacy was evaluated by tracking patient weight.

Results: The 6-week project included 37 patients on the medical intensive care unit service. Of these patients, 28 gained weight; the mean change in weight was +6.2%. The practice change was well perceived by staff and is now an established part of care for any patient receiving enteral feedings at the study hospital.

Conclusions: The deimplementation of routine gastric residual volume monitoring is supported by evidence. Use of a focused gastrointestinal nursing assessment to identify enteral feeding intolerance is safe, feasible, and effective and improves nutrition delivery and nurses' workflow.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
取消胃残余容积监测以增强患者营养。
背景:常规胃剩余容积监测在护理实践中仍然很常见。然而,目前的证据支持使用重点护理评估来识别肠内喂养不耐受的体征和症状,如腹痛、腹胀和呕吐。当地问题:在作者所在的机构,护士和其他临床医生开始报告胃剩余容积监测不一致,以及肠内营养供应经常中断:质量改进项目包括内科重症监护室接受肠内营养的病人。取消了胃剩余容积监测。取而代之的是,根据肠内喂养不耐受的体征和症状暂停肠内营养。为护理这些患者的护士、执业护士和医生提供了多模式教育。通过员工查房进行形成性评估,通过员工调查进行总结性评估,并通过跟踪患者体重评估营养是否充足:该项目为期 6 周,包括内科重症监护室的 37 名病人。其中,28 名患者的体重有所增加;体重的平均变化率为 +6.2%。员工对这一做法的改变反响良好,目前已成为研究医院为所有接受肠内喂养的患者提供护理的一部分:结论:取消常规胃剩余容积监测有据可依。使用重点胃肠道护理评估来识别肠内喂养不耐受是安全、可行和有效的,并能改善营养提供和护士的工作流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical care nurse
Critical care nurse 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Critical Care Nurse (CCN) is an official publication of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN). Authors are invited to submit manuscripts for consideration and peer review. Clinical topics must meet the mission of CCN and address nursing practice of acute and critically ill patients.
期刊最新文献
Assistive Communication Device Used During Pediatric Noninvasive Ventilation. Addressing Workplace Violence in Critical Care: A Call for Comprehensive Training and Support. Dental Hygienist Intervention to Prevent Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in an Intensive Care Unit. Early Mobility After Cardiac Surgery: A Quality Improvement Project. Evidence-Based Approach to Appropriate Staffing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1