Ethical challenges in organ transplants for refugees in a healthcare system.

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Nursing Ethics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-07 DOI:10.1177/09697330241230528
Deniz Birtan, Aslihan Akpinar
{"title":"Ethical challenges in organ transplants for refugees in a healthcare system.","authors":"Deniz Birtan, Aslihan Akpinar","doi":"10.1177/09697330241230528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several ethical issues are associated with providing living organ transplantation services, and there is limited information on these issues faced by the teams providing service to refugees or asylum seekers.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the challenges healthcare professionals face in organ transplant centers providing services to Syrians under temporary protection status and discern whether these difficulties align with ethical issues in living organ transplantation.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>This study employed a qualitative design and conducted individual semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 18 transplant team members in Istanbul between September and November 2022. Data analysis was based on Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Participants and research context: </strong>The participants comprised 18 healthcare professionals, including 6 physicians and 12 nurses working in organ transplant teams in Istanbul.</p><p><strong>Ethical considerations: </strong>The University's Ethics Committee provided approval. Participants were informed regarding confidentiality and signed an informed consent form.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes emerged from the data on ethical issues faced by organ transplantation services to Syrians: (a) beneficence or double equipoise, (b) autonomy, and (c) justice. Transplant teams experience problems related to preserving double equipoise in the provision of living donor organ transplantation because of language barriers, poor socioeconomic conditions, and cultural factors, which increases transplant teams' individual and indirect social burden. Although problems arise from the language barrier when obtaining informed consent in the autonomy theme, institutional and national policies in preventing donor abuse have a comforting effect. Health workers had the least problems with the justice theme, wherein national health policies are determined.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fewer issues related to autonomy and justice were reported in providing organ transplantation services to Syrians, with the most intense reported issues being maintaining double equipoise. The results revealed the need to develop institutional, national, and international policies with individual solutions to prevent difficulties healthcare professionals face in this process.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"71-87"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241230528","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several ethical issues are associated with providing living organ transplantation services, and there is limited information on these issues faced by the teams providing service to refugees or asylum seekers.

Aim: To determine the challenges healthcare professionals face in organ transplant centers providing services to Syrians under temporary protection status and discern whether these difficulties align with ethical issues in living organ transplantation.

Research design: This study employed a qualitative design and conducted individual semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 18 transplant team members in Istanbul between September and November 2022. Data analysis was based on Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis.

Participants and research context: The participants comprised 18 healthcare professionals, including 6 physicians and 12 nurses working in organ transplant teams in Istanbul.

Ethical considerations: The University's Ethics Committee provided approval. Participants were informed regarding confidentiality and signed an informed consent form.

Results: Three themes emerged from the data on ethical issues faced by organ transplantation services to Syrians: (a) beneficence or double equipoise, (b) autonomy, and (c) justice. Transplant teams experience problems related to preserving double equipoise in the provision of living donor organ transplantation because of language barriers, poor socioeconomic conditions, and cultural factors, which increases transplant teams' individual and indirect social burden. Although problems arise from the language barrier when obtaining informed consent in the autonomy theme, institutional and national policies in preventing donor abuse have a comforting effect. Health workers had the least problems with the justice theme, wherein national health policies are determined.

Conclusion: Fewer issues related to autonomy and justice were reported in providing organ transplantation services to Syrians, with the most intense reported issues being maintaining double equipoise. The results revealed the need to develop institutional, national, and international policies with individual solutions to prevent difficulties healthcare professionals face in this process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗系统中难民器官移植的伦理挑战。
背景:目的:确定器官移植中心的医护人员在为处于临时保护状态的叙利亚人提供服务时所面临的挑战,并确定这些困难是否与活体器官移植的伦理问题相一致:本研究采用定性设计,在 2022 年 9 月至 11 月期间对伊斯坦布尔的 18 名器官移植团队成员进行了个人半结构化深入访谈。数据分析基于布劳恩和克拉克的主题分析法:参与者包括 18 名医护人员,其中包括 6 名医生和 12 名护士,他们都在伊斯坦布尔的器官移植团队工作:大学伦理委员会批准了这项研究。参与者被告知保密事宜,并签署了知情同意书:从有关叙利亚人器官移植服务面临的伦理问题的数据中发现了三个主题:(a) 恩惠或双重平衡,(b) 自主权和 (c) 公正。由于语言障碍、恶劣的社会经济条件和文化因素,移植团队在提供活体器官移植服务时遇到了与维护双重平衡相关的问题,这增加了移植团队的个人和间接社会负担。虽然在自主性主题中获得知情同意时会出现语言障碍问题,但防止滥用供体的机构和国家政策起到了安慰作用。医务工作者在确定国家卫生政策的公正主题方面遇到的问题最少:结论:在为叙利亚人提供器官移植服务的过程中,与自主性和公正性相关的问题较少,报告最强烈的问题是保持双重平衡。研究结果表明,有必要制定具有个性化解决方案的机构、国家和国际政策,以防止医护人员在此过程中遇到困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
期刊最新文献
30 Years of Nursing Ethics: Reflections on progress in the field. Responses to "Reflections on 30 Years of Nursing Ethics". Ethical climate, moral resilience, and ethical competence of head nurses. Ethical challenges in organ transplants for refugees in a healthcare system. Prioritization decision-making of care in nursing homes: A qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1