Reflections on co-production: Developing a dementia research funding application with a diverse lived experience group.

Dementia (London, England) Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1177/14713012241231916
Sarah Griffiths, Martin Robertson, Chandrika Kaviraj, Firoza Davies, Marie McDevitt, Al Richards, Marcelline Russell
{"title":"Reflections on co-production: Developing a dementia research funding application with a diverse lived experience group.","authors":"Sarah Griffiths, Martin Robertson, Chandrika Kaviraj, Firoza Davies, Marie McDevitt, Al Richards, Marcelline Russell","doi":"10.1177/14713012241231916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction and Background to Study:</b> Published work on dementia research co-production focuses on developing health and social care interventions. Less is written about practicalities and experiences of co-producing dementia research funding applications. UK public contributors are typically from white middle class populations. Widening involvement is essential for co-produced research that meaningfully addresses health inequalities. We provide an example of a diverse lived experience group co-producing a dementia research funding application. An NIHR Dementia Career Development award funded PPIE work to develop a broad research idea. A culturally diverse lived experience group consisted of one person living with dementia, four carers and one former carer. Virtual group sessions drew on each person's unique experiences and expertise. Two co-leads collaborated closely with the researcher. <b>Methods:</b> We reflected on our experiences of diversity and inclusion within the group, based on a coproduced set of questions to guide reflection. Written records of reflections were captured and refined by the group. <b>Results:</b> We structured reflections into three overarching categories: Diversity and inclusion, Benefits to group members and Challenges. The group felt empowered, heard, and like equals in the process. Members valued diversity and mutual learning within the group. Involvement of co-leads was seen as democratic and inclusive. Some members felt Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) discussions were challenging. <b>Discussion and Conclusions:</b> We share valuable lessons learned in the process, including suggestions for facilitating EDI discussions, building in funding for time and travel to support relationship building, and ensuring PPIE remuneration processes are accessible and streamlined.</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"709-723"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11163838/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012241231916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and Background to Study: Published work on dementia research co-production focuses on developing health and social care interventions. Less is written about practicalities and experiences of co-producing dementia research funding applications. UK public contributors are typically from white middle class populations. Widening involvement is essential for co-produced research that meaningfully addresses health inequalities. We provide an example of a diverse lived experience group co-producing a dementia research funding application. An NIHR Dementia Career Development award funded PPIE work to develop a broad research idea. A culturally diverse lived experience group consisted of one person living with dementia, four carers and one former carer. Virtual group sessions drew on each person's unique experiences and expertise. Two co-leads collaborated closely with the researcher. Methods: We reflected on our experiences of diversity and inclusion within the group, based on a coproduced set of questions to guide reflection. Written records of reflections were captured and refined by the group. Results: We structured reflections into three overarching categories: Diversity and inclusion, Benefits to group members and Challenges. The group felt empowered, heard, and like equals in the process. Members valued diversity and mutual learning within the group. Involvement of co-leads was seen as democratic and inclusive. Some members felt Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) discussions were challenging. Discussion and Conclusions: We share valuable lessons learned in the process, including suggestions for facilitating EDI discussions, building in funding for time and travel to support relationship building, and ensuring PPIE remuneration processes are accessible and streamlined.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于共同生产的思考:与具有不同生活经验的群体共同开发痴呆症研究资金申请。
导言和研究背景:已发表的有关共同开展痴呆症研究的著作主要集中在制定医疗和社会护理干预措施方面。有关共同制作痴呆症研究资金申请的实际情况和经验的文章较少。英国的公众捐助者通常来自白人中产阶级。扩大参与对于共同生产研究有意义地解决健康不平等问题至关重要。我们提供了一个由不同生活经验群体共同制作痴呆症研究资金申请的实例。英国国家痴呆症研究与康复中心(NIHR)的痴呆症职业发展奖资助了PPIE的工作,以开发一个广泛的研究构想。一个文化多元的生活经验小组由一名痴呆症患者、四名照护者和一名前照护者组成。虚拟小组会议利用了每个人的独特经验和专业知识。两名共同负责人与研究人员密切合作。方法:我们根据共同提出的一系列问题,在小组内反思我们在多样性和包容性方面的经验,以指导反思。小组收集并完善了反思的书面记录。结果:我们将反思分为三大类:多样性和包容性、对小组成员的益处和挑战。在这一过程中,小组成员感到自己被赋予了权力、被倾听了意见,并感到自己是平等的。小组成员重视小组内的多样性和相互学习。共同领导的参与被认为是民主和包容的。一些成员认为平等、多样性和包容性(EDI)讨论具有挑战性。讨论和结论:我们分享了在这一过程中获得的宝贵经验,包括促进平等、多样性和包容性(EDI)讨论的建议、为时间和差旅提供资金以支持关系建设的建议,以及确保PPIE薪酬流程的可及性和简化性的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the effectiveness and experiences of people living with dementia interacting with digital interventions: A mixed methods systematic review. A scoping review of dementia education programs to assess for the inclusion of culture. Evolving dementia care: An explorative study on the lived experience of older adults living with dementia in nursing homes using observational and biometric sensor data. Community health workers supporting diverse family caregivers of persons with dementia: Preliminary qualitative results from a randomized home-based study. Participation of persons living with dementia in research: A means to address epistemic injustice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1