Application of the Bair Hugger™ core body temperature at wrist region with upper body warming blanket: a prospective observational study.

IF 3.2 Anesthesia and pain medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-30 DOI:10.17085/apm.23107
Kyung Seo Oh, Yong-Hee Park, Chongwha Baek, Young-Cheol Woo
{"title":"Application of the Bair Hugger™ core body temperature at wrist region with upper body warming blanket: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Kyung Seo Oh, Yong-Hee Park, Chongwha Baek, Young-Cheol Woo","doi":"10.17085/apm.23107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Body temperature monitoring is essential during the perioperative period. However, core body temperature measurement requires invasive device that may cause complications. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of non-invasive Bair Hugger™ core body temperature monitoring system (BHTMS) at the wrist compared with esophageal temperature under general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty adult patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II were enrolled. BHTMS sensor was applied at wrist region. After tracheal intubation, an esophageal probe was inserted. Bair Hugger™ upper body warming blankets were used. Esophageal temperature (Teso) and BHTMS at wrist (Twrist) were recorded every 10 min.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total of 257 pairs of data sets were analyzed: Teso and Twrist had no statistically significant difference (P = 0.103). Median of Teso and Twrist were 36.5°C and 36.4°C. Bland-Altman analysis showed Teso - Twrist of 0.14°C ± 1.44. Subsequently, 99 pairs of 0-40 min data set were analyzed and showed significant difference at 0 and 10 min (P < 0.001) but no significant difference at 20, 30 and 40 min. Bland- Altman plot by times showed difference (Teso - Twrist) of 1.49°C ± 2.00, 0.82°C ± 1.30, 0.29°C ± 1.32, -0.03°C ± 0.84, and -0.12°C ± 0.82 at 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 min respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BHTMS at wrist area under the upper body warming blanket is a potential alternative other than esophageal temperature for monitoring body temperature after 30 min of anesthesia induction.</p>","PeriodicalId":101360,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":"35-43"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10846997/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.23107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Body temperature monitoring is essential during the perioperative period. However, core body temperature measurement requires invasive device that may cause complications. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of non-invasive Bair Hugger™ core body temperature monitoring system (BHTMS) at the wrist compared with esophageal temperature under general anesthesia.

Methods: Twenty adult patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II were enrolled. BHTMS sensor was applied at wrist region. After tracheal intubation, an esophageal probe was inserted. Bair Hugger™ upper body warming blankets were used. Esophageal temperature (Teso) and BHTMS at wrist (Twrist) were recorded every 10 min.

Results: Total of 257 pairs of data sets were analyzed: Teso and Twrist had no statistically significant difference (P = 0.103). Median of Teso and Twrist were 36.5°C and 36.4°C. Bland-Altman analysis showed Teso - Twrist of 0.14°C ± 1.44. Subsequently, 99 pairs of 0-40 min data set were analyzed and showed significant difference at 0 and 10 min (P < 0.001) but no significant difference at 20, 30 and 40 min. Bland- Altman plot by times showed difference (Teso - Twrist) of 1.49°C ± 2.00, 0.82°C ± 1.30, 0.29°C ± 1.32, -0.03°C ± 0.84, and -0.12°C ± 0.82 at 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 min respectively.

Conclusions: BHTMS at wrist area under the upper body warming blanket is a potential alternative other than esophageal temperature for monitoring body temperature after 30 min of anesthesia induction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用 Bair Hugger™ 上半身保暖毯对手腕部位进行核心体温测量:一项前瞻性观察研究。
背景:体温监测在围手术期至关重要。然而,核心体温测量需要侵入性设备,可能会引起并发症。本研究旨在评估无创 Bair Hugger™ 核心体温监测系统(BHTMS)与食道体温在全身麻醉下的准确性:方法:20 名美国麻醉医师协会体能状态 I 或 II 的成年患者入选。将 BHTMS 传感器安装在手腕部位。气管插管后,插入食管探针。使用 Bair Hugger™ 上身保暖毯。每 10 分钟记录一次食管温度(Teso)和手腕处的 BHTMS(Twrist):共分析了 257 对数据集:Teso和Twrist在统计学上无显著差异(P = 0.103)。Teso和Twrist的中位数分别为36.5°C和36.4°C。Bland-Altman 分析显示,Teso - Twrist 为 0.14°C ± 1.44。随后,对 99 对 0-40 分钟的数据集进行了分析,结果显示 0 和 10 分钟时有显著差异(P < 0.001),但 20、30 和 40 分钟时无显著差异。按时间绘制的 Bland- Altman 图显示,0、10、20、30 和 40 分钟的差异(Teso - Twrist)分别为 1.49°C ± 2.00、0.82°C ± 1.30、0.29°C ± 1.32、-0.03°C ± 0.84 和 -0.12°C ± 0.82:结论:上半身保暖毯下手腕部位的 BHTMS 是麻醉诱导 30 分钟后监测体温的食道温度以外的一种潜在替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Management of broken catheter during neuroplasty using epidural balloon catheter for lumbar spinal stenosis - A case report. NLRP3 inflammasome: a key driver of neuroinflammation and a novel therapeutic target for neuropathic pain. Effects of immediate extubation in patients after liver transplantation. A systematic review of the respiratory effects of ultrasound-guided phrenic nerve block. Comparison of the effects of remimazolam and inhalational anesthesia on postoperative recovery in patients undergoing general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1