Life cycle GHG emission reduction of hydrotreated vegetable oil integration in an industrial petroleum refinery

Dimitrios-Sotirios Kourkoumpas , Angeliki Sagani , Anastasios Vallianatos , Spyros Kiartzis , Sotirios Karellas , Vassilis Dedoussis , Panagiotis Grammelis
{"title":"Life cycle GHG emission reduction of hydrotreated vegetable oil integration in an industrial petroleum refinery","authors":"Dimitrios-Sotirios Kourkoumpas ,&nbsp;Angeliki Sagani ,&nbsp;Anastasios Vallianatos ,&nbsp;Spyros Kiartzis ,&nbsp;Sotirios Karellas ,&nbsp;Vassilis Dedoussis ,&nbsp;Panagiotis Grammelis","doi":"10.1016/j.grets.2024.100076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this paper is to perform a comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment to evaluate the environmental performance, in terms of GHG emissions, of co-processing Used Cooking Oil (UCO) with fossil light gas oil into a current diesel hydrotreater unit at an industrial refinery, located in Northern Greece. Two scenarios have been defined and compared, considering: (i) the hydrodesulphurization process of light gas oil for the production of conventional ultralow sulphur diesel fuel (reference scenario), and (ii) the integration of pre-treated UCO along with conventional fossil feed at 5/95% volume ratio, for the production of Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO) (retrofit scenario). The results of the LCA analysis show that the net life cycle GHG emissions associated with fossil diesel production amount to 103.41 gCO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mi>2eq</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>/MJ, while the relevant ones related to the HVO/blended diesel production are 95.42 gCO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mi>2eq</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>/MJ. A considerable GHG emissions reduction (about 7.7%) will be incurred by the substitution of conventional fossil diesel fuel with the HVO blended diesel one. A newbuild refining facility using exclusively used cooking oil as feedstock could further increase the GHG emission savings up to 93%, indicating that additional research is required regarding the environmental performance of sustainable fuel production processes. Furthermore, alternative sources of biomass feedstock need to be investigated, because of the maximum cap on used cooking oil set in the Renewable Energy Directive (RED II) legislation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100598,"journal":{"name":"Green Technologies and Sustainability","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100076"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949736124000034/pdfft?md5=6b396480fb3a6e2b51ee8822cffa70a4&pid=1-s2.0-S2949736124000034-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green Technologies and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949736124000034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to perform a comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment to evaluate the environmental performance, in terms of GHG emissions, of co-processing Used Cooking Oil (UCO) with fossil light gas oil into a current diesel hydrotreater unit at an industrial refinery, located in Northern Greece. Two scenarios have been defined and compared, considering: (i) the hydrodesulphurization process of light gas oil for the production of conventional ultralow sulphur diesel fuel (reference scenario), and (ii) the integration of pre-treated UCO along with conventional fossil feed at 5/95% volume ratio, for the production of Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO) (retrofit scenario). The results of the LCA analysis show that the net life cycle GHG emissions associated with fossil diesel production amount to 103.41 gCO2eq/MJ, while the relevant ones related to the HVO/blended diesel production are 95.42 gCO2eq/MJ. A considerable GHG emissions reduction (about 7.7%) will be incurred by the substitution of conventional fossil diesel fuel with the HVO blended diesel one. A newbuild refining facility using exclusively used cooking oil as feedstock could further increase the GHG emission savings up to 93%, indicating that additional research is required regarding the environmental performance of sustainable fuel production processes. Furthermore, alternative sources of biomass feedstock need to be investigated, because of the maximum cap on used cooking oil set in the Renewable Energy Directive (RED II) legislation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工业炼油厂加氢处理植物油一体化的生命周期温室气体减排
本文旨在进行一项全面的生命周期评估,以从温室气体排放的角度评估将废食用油 (UCO) 与化石轻质燃气油共同处理到位于希腊北部的一家工业炼油厂的现有柴油加氢装置中的环境绩效。确定并比较了两种方案,分别考虑:(i) 轻质燃气油的加氢脱硫工艺,用于生产传统的超低硫柴油燃料(参考方案);(ii) 将预处理过的 UCO 与传统的化石原料以 5/95% 的体积比混合,用于生产加氢处理植物油(HVO)(改造方案)。生命周期评估分析结果表明,与化石柴油生产相关的生命周期温室气体净排放量为 103.41 gCO2eq/MJ,而与加氢脱氧植物油/混合柴油生产相关的排放量为 95.42 gCO2eq/MJ。用高纯度液化石油气混合柴油替代传统化石柴油将大大减少温室气体排放(约 7.7%)。如果新建的炼油厂完全使用废食用油作为原料,则可进一步将温室气体排放量的减少量提高到 93%,这表明还需要对可持续燃料生产过程的环保性能进行更多的研究。此外,由于《可再生能源指令》(RED II)立法规定了使用过的烹调油的最高上限,因此需要对生物质原料的替代来源进行调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimizing solar PV systems using fuzzy logic for Climate-Resilient Healthcare infrastructure in Kyrgyzstan Environmental risk assessment of concrete construction projects in developing countries based on Analytical Hierarchy Process method A green approach to adaptive cultivation of Chlorella sorokiniana in oilfield hypersaline wastewater for sustainable biomass production, nutrient removal, and bioenergy potential Is renewable energy storage sustainable? A review The potential of green roof strategies for reducing CO2 emissions and energy use in Moroccan office buildings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1