Why Do Men Reject Adjuvant Radiotherapy following Radical Prostatectomy? A Systematic Survey.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urologia Internationalis Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-07 DOI:10.1159/000536609
Silvan Sigg, Winfried Arnold, Nico Christian Grossmann, Philipp Baumeister, Christian Daniel Fankhauser, Mike Wenzel, Agostino Mattei, Christoph Würnschimmel
{"title":"Why Do Men Reject Adjuvant Radiotherapy following Radical Prostatectomy? A Systematic Survey.","authors":"Silvan Sigg, Winfried Arnold, Nico Christian Grossmann, Philipp Baumeister, Christian Daniel Fankhauser, Mike Wenzel, Agostino Mattei, Christoph Würnschimmel","doi":"10.1159/000536609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate non-adherence rates to adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) after radical prostatectomy (RP) and to obtain patient reported reasons for rejecting aRT despite recommendation by a multidisciplinary team discussion (MTD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a retrospective monocentric analysis, we identified 1,197 prostate cancer patients who underwent RP between 2014 and 2022 at our institution, of which 735 received a postoperative MTD recommendation. Patients with a recommendation for aRT underwent a structured phone interview with predefined standardised qualitative and quantitative questions and were stratified into \"adherent\" (aRT performed) and \"non-adherent\" groups (aRT not performed).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 55 patients receiving a recommendation for aRT (7.5% of all RP patients), 24 (44%) were non-adherent. Baseline tumour characteristics were comparable among the groups. \"Fear of radiation damage\" was the most common reason for rejection, followed by \"lack of information,\" \"feeling that the treating physician does not support the recommendation\" and \"the impression that aRT is not associated with improved oncological outcome.\" Salvage radiotherapy was performed in 25% of non-adherent patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High rates of non-adherence to aRT after RP were observed, and reasons for this phenomenon are most likely multifactorial. Multidisciplinary and individualized patient counselling might be a key for increasing adherence rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":23414,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Internationalis","volume":" ","pages":"211-218"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Internationalis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000536609","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate non-adherence rates to adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) after radical prostatectomy (RP) and to obtain patient reported reasons for rejecting aRT despite recommendation by a multidisciplinary team discussion (MTD).

Methods: In a retrospective monocentric analysis, we identified 1,197 prostate cancer patients who underwent RP between 2014 and 2022 at our institution, of which 735 received a postoperative MTD recommendation. Patients with a recommendation for aRT underwent a structured phone interview with predefined standardised qualitative and quantitative questions and were stratified into "adherent" (aRT performed) and "non-adherent" groups (aRT not performed).

Results: Of 55 patients receiving a recommendation for aRT (7.5% of all RP patients), 24 (44%) were non-adherent. Baseline tumour characteristics were comparable among the groups. "Fear of radiation damage" was the most common reason for rejection, followed by "lack of information," "feeling that the treating physician does not support the recommendation" and "the impression that aRT is not associated with improved oncological outcome." Salvage radiotherapy was performed in 25% of non-adherent patients.

Conclusion: High rates of non-adherence to aRT after RP were observed, and reasons for this phenomenon are most likely multifactorial. Multidisciplinary and individualized patient counselling might be a key for increasing adherence rates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前列腺癌根治术后男性为何拒绝辅助放疗?一项系统调查。
目的 调查根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后不坚持辅助放疗(aRT)的比例,并了解患者报告的在多学科团队讨论(MTD)建议下仍拒绝接受 aRT 的原因。方法 在一项回顾性单中心分析中,我们确定了 2014-2022 年间在本院接受前列腺癌根治术的 1197 例前列腺癌患者,其中 735 例接受了术后 MTD 建议。建议接受前列腺癌根治术的患者接受了结构化电话访谈,访谈内容包括预定义的标准化定性和定量问题,并被分为 "坚持 "组(接受前列腺癌根治术)和 "不坚持 "组(未接受前列腺癌根治术)。结果 在接受 aRT 建议的 55 名患者(占所有 RP 患者的 7.5%)中,有 24 人(44%)未坚持进行 aRT。各组的基线肿瘤特征相当。"害怕放射损伤 "是最常见的拒绝原因,其次是 "缺乏信息"、"觉得主治医生不支持建议 "和 "认为放疗与改善肿瘤预后无关"。25%的非依从患者接受了挽救性放射治疗(sRT)。结论 RP术后不坚持aRT治疗的比例很高,造成这种现象的原因很可能是多方面的。多学科和个性化的患者咨询可能是提高依从率的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urologia Internationalis
Urologia Internationalis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Concise but fully substantiated international reports of clinically oriented research into science and current management of urogenital disorders form the nucleus of original as well as basic research papers. These are supplemented by up-to-date reviews by international experts on the state-of-the-art of key topics of clinical urological practice. Essential topics receiving regular coverage include the introduction of new techniques and instrumentation as well as the evaluation of new functional tests and diagnostic methods. Special attention is given to advances in surgical techniques and clinical oncology. The regular publication of selected case reports represents the great variation in urological disease and illustrates treatment solutions in singular cases.
期刊最新文献
A unique case of bilateral testicular tumours: nonseminomatous germ cell tumour and contralateral spermatocytic tumour with 27 years apart. Who changes indwelling urinary catheters in male nursing home residents and where? Results from a nationwide cross-sectional survey in Germany. Gender specific differences in urethral swabs: a retrospective single-center analysis. A Programmatic Approach to En Bloc Transurethral Enucleation of the Prostate with Bipolar System (TUEB): A Single-Center Retrospective Report. Gender-specific differences in recurrence and progression following BCG instillation for NMIBC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1