Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy: A Nursing Perspective.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING Journal of Community Health Nursing Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-08 DOI:10.1080/07370016.2024.2312144
Bridgette Crotwell Pullis, Barbara E Hekel, Robert M Pullis
{"title":"Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy: A Nursing Perspective.","authors":"Bridgette Crotwell Pullis, Barbara E Hekel, Robert M Pullis","doi":"10.1080/07370016.2024.2312144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Vaccination is one of the most successful and cost-effective health promotion interventions, preventing millions of deaths per year. Vaccine hesitancy (VH) received renewed attention in the United States when over 30 million Americans were undecided or had barriers to receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. The purpose is to examine the literature regarding vaccine hesitancy, its history and legal aspects.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An interprofessional team of a lawyer and two nurses reviewed the literature to synthesize the history of vaccine hesitancy and documented effective strategies to address disinformation, misinformation, and other barriers to vaccine uptake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a thorough review of the literature regarding vaccine hesitancy, including legal aspects.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There is a scarcity of available literature regarding effective strategies, especially from the nursing perspective. Much of the literature on vaccine hesitancy dates back to the 1970's, offering few strategies to address this issue. Nursing implications and strategies to address vaccine hesitancy from a nursing perspective are provided, including an innovative example of preparing nursing students to address vaccine hesitancy through participation in a high-fidelity simulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vaccination uptake is impacted by misinformation and disinformation. Vaccine hesitancy is impacting the uptake of other routine immunizations putting Americans at risk. Regardless of vaccination policies, health care professionals must be prepared to communicate with people who have a wide range of VH. Strategies such as providing accurate information, addressing patient concerns, and reducing barriers to access decrease VH.</p>","PeriodicalId":51084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Health Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07370016.2024.2312144","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Vaccination is one of the most successful and cost-effective health promotion interventions, preventing millions of deaths per year. Vaccine hesitancy (VH) received renewed attention in the United States when over 30 million Americans were undecided or had barriers to receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. The purpose is to examine the literature regarding vaccine hesitancy, its history and legal aspects.

Design: An interprofessional team of a lawyer and two nurses reviewed the literature to synthesize the history of vaccine hesitancy and documented effective strategies to address disinformation, misinformation, and other barriers to vaccine uptake.

Methods: The authors conducted a thorough review of the literature regarding vaccine hesitancy, including legal aspects.

Findings: There is a scarcity of available literature regarding effective strategies, especially from the nursing perspective. Much of the literature on vaccine hesitancy dates back to the 1970's, offering few strategies to address this issue. Nursing implications and strategies to address vaccine hesitancy from a nursing perspective are provided, including an innovative example of preparing nursing students to address vaccine hesitancy through participation in a high-fidelity simulation.

Conclusions: Vaccination uptake is impacted by misinformation and disinformation. Vaccine hesitancy is impacting the uptake of other routine immunizations putting Americans at risk. Regardless of vaccination policies, health care professionals must be prepared to communicate with people who have a wide range of VH. Strategies such as providing accurate information, addressing patient concerns, and reducing barriers to access decrease VH.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解决疫苗疑虑:护理视角。
目的:接种疫苗是最成功、最具成本效益的健康促进干预措施之一,每年可预防数百万人死亡。当超过 3000 万美国人对接种 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫不决或存在障碍时,疫苗犹豫(VH)在美国再次受到关注。本文旨在研究有关疫苗犹豫、其历史和法律方面的文献:由一名律师和两名护士组成的跨专业团队对文献进行了回顾,总结了疫苗犹豫不决的历史,并记录了解决虚假信息、错误信息和其他疫苗接种障碍的有效策略:作者对有关疫苗犹豫不决的文献进行了全面回顾,包括法律方面的内容:有关有效策略的现有文献很少,尤其是从护理角度来看。有关疫苗犹豫不决的大部分文献可追溯到 20 世纪 70 年代,但几乎没有提供解决这一问题的策略。本文提供了从护理角度解决疫苗犹豫不决问题的护理意义和策略,包括一个通过参与高仿真模拟来帮助护理专业学生解决疫苗犹豫不决问题的创新实例:结论:疫苗接种率受到错误信息和虚假信息的影响。疫苗接种犹豫影响了其他常规免疫接种的接种率,使美国人面临风险。无论疫苗接种政策如何,医疗保健专业人员都必须做好准备,与各种不同的 VH 患者进行沟通。提供准确的信息、消除患者的顾虑以及减少接种障碍等策略都能减少 VH。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: This innovative publication focuses on health care issues relevant to all aspects of community practice -- home health care, visiting nursing services, clinics, hospices, education, and public health administration. Well-researched articles provide practical and up-to-date information to aid the nurse who must frequently make decisions and solve problems without the back-up support systems available in the hospital. The journal is a forum for community health professionals to share their experience and expertise with others in the field.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Sitting Baduanjin Exercises on Cognitive Function, Attention, and Muscle Strength among Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment. Texas Dance for Health: Mixed Methods Pilot Study Promoting Physical Activity Among Older Adults. Training Community Health Workers to Respond to Public Health Demands. Determining Adults' Attitudes towards Cancer Screening, Information Load, and Mythical Causes of Cancer. Help-Seeking Preferences and Influencing Factors Among Chinese Nurses Exposed to COVID-19: A Person-Centered Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1