Quan Wang, Nan Jiang, Weidong Chen, Li Cheng, Shuai Fu, Qiang Li, Hongbo Li
{"title":"Prevention of Dialysis Catheter Malfunction with Urokinase and Heparin: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.","authors":"Quan Wang, Nan Jiang, Weidong Chen, Li Cheng, Shuai Fu, Qiang Li, Hongbo Li","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of urokinase and heparin in preventing catheter infection and dysfunction in permanent hemodialysis tunneled cuffed catheters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomized 153 cases of maintenance hemodialysis patients with newly implanted permanent hemodialysis tunneled cannula catheters from November 2018 to November 2021 for this single-center prospective randomized controlled trial The eligible patients were given one of two treatment plans: Patients in the control group (73 patients) were given heparin (6260 U/mL)three times a week after hemodialysis. The intervention group (80 cases) was administered urokinase(25000 U/mL) on the basis of heparin. After six months of maintenance hemodialysis with the above sealing protocols, the primary result was the frequency of catheter malfunction, and the secondary outcome was the frequency of catheter-associated infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the final analysis of 153 patients, catheter malfunctions occurred in 29 of the 80 patients assigned to heparin alone, with an incidence of 36.3%, and 16 of the 73 subjects assigned to urokinase combined with heparin, with a rate of 21.9%. This represents an almost 2-fold increase in the risk of catheter malfunction among patients treated with heparin alone as compared to those treated with urokinase once weekly (hazard ratio, 1.85; 13 patients (16.3%) allocated to heparin alone experienced catheter-related bacteremia, compared to 4 patients (5.5%) assigned to urokinase (hazard ratio, 2.79; 95%CI, 1.08 to 7.22; P = .03). Baseline levels, and adverse events, including bleeding incidents, did not statistically differ between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Urokinase can be used as a secondary prevention drug for long-term catheter malfunction and infection based on its cheapness, efficacy, and safety, which can effectively save medical costs, and its sealing protocol is simple and suitable for promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":7571,"journal":{"name":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","volume":" ","pages":"218-224"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of urokinase and heparin in preventing catheter infection and dysfunction in permanent hemodialysis tunneled cuffed catheters.
Methods: We randomized 153 cases of maintenance hemodialysis patients with newly implanted permanent hemodialysis tunneled cannula catheters from November 2018 to November 2021 for this single-center prospective randomized controlled trial The eligible patients were given one of two treatment plans: Patients in the control group (73 patients) were given heparin (6260 U/mL)three times a week after hemodialysis. The intervention group (80 cases) was administered urokinase(25000 U/mL) on the basis of heparin. After six months of maintenance hemodialysis with the above sealing protocols, the primary result was the frequency of catheter malfunction, and the secondary outcome was the frequency of catheter-associated infection.
Results: In the final analysis of 153 patients, catheter malfunctions occurred in 29 of the 80 patients assigned to heparin alone, with an incidence of 36.3%, and 16 of the 73 subjects assigned to urokinase combined with heparin, with a rate of 21.9%. This represents an almost 2-fold increase in the risk of catheter malfunction among patients treated with heparin alone as compared to those treated with urokinase once weekly (hazard ratio, 1.85; 13 patients (16.3%) allocated to heparin alone experienced catheter-related bacteremia, compared to 4 patients (5.5%) assigned to urokinase (hazard ratio, 2.79; 95%CI, 1.08 to 7.22; P = .03). Baseline levels, and adverse events, including bleeding incidents, did not statistically differ between the two groups.
Conclusion: Urokinase can be used as a secondary prevention drug for long-term catheter malfunction and infection based on its cheapness, efficacy, and safety, which can effectively save medical costs, and its sealing protocol is simple and suitable for promotion.
期刊介绍:
Launched in 1995, Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine has a mission to promote the art and science of integrative medicine and a responsibility to improve public health. We strive to maintain the highest standards of ethical medical journalism independent of special interests that is timely, accurate, and a pleasure to read. We publish original, peer-reviewed scientific articles that provide health care providers with continuing education to promote health, prevent illness, and treat disease. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine was the first journal in this field to be indexed in the National Library of Medicine. In 2006, 2007, and 2008, ATHM had the highest impact factor ranking of any independently published peer-reviewed CAM journal in the United States—meaning that its research articles were cited more frequently than any other journal’s in the field.
Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine does not endorse any particular system or method but promotes the evaluation and appropriate use of all effective therapeutic approaches. Each issue contains a variety of disciplined inquiry methods, from case reports to original scientific research to systematic reviews. The editors encourage the integration of evidence-based emerging therapies with conventional medical practices by licensed health care providers in a way that promotes a comprehensive approach to health care that is focused on wellness, prevention, and healing. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine hopes to inform all licensed health care practitioners about developments in fields other than their own and to foster an ongoing debate about the scientific, clinical, historical, legal, political, and cultural issues that affect all of health care.