Systematic Review Examining the Behavior Change Techniques in Medication Adherence Intervention Studies Among People With Type 2 Diabetes.

IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Annals of Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1093/abm/kaae001
Vivien Teo, John Weinman, Kai Zhen Yap
{"title":"Systematic Review Examining the Behavior Change Techniques in Medication Adherence Intervention Studies Among People With Type 2 Diabetes.","authors":"Vivien Teo, John Weinman, Kai Zhen Yap","doi":"10.1093/abm/kaae001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although previous systematic reviews have studied medication adherence interventions among people with Type 2 diabetes (PwT2D), no intervention has been found to improve medication adherence consistently. Furthermore, inconsistent and poor reporting of intervention description has made understanding, replication, and evaluation of intervention challenging.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to identify the behavior change techniques (BCTs) and characteristics of successful medication adherence interventions among PwT2D.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted on Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials with BCT-codable interventions designed to influence adherence to anti-diabetic medication for PwT2D aged 18 years old and above and have medication adherence measure as an outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five studies were included. Successful interventions tend to target medication adherence only, involve pharmacists as the interventionist, contain \"Credible source\" (BCT 9.1), \"Instruction on how to perform the behaviour\" (BCT 4.1), \"Social support (practical)\" (BCT 3.2), \"Action planning\" (BCT 1.4), and/ or \"Information about health consequences\" (BCT 5.1). Very few interventions described its context, used theory, examined adherence outcomes during the follow-up period after an intervention has ended, or were tailored to address specific barriers of medication adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified specific BCTs and characteristics that are commonly reported in successful medication adherence interventions, which can facilitate the development of future interventions. Our review highlighted the need to consider and clearly describe different dimensions of context, theory, fidelity, and tailoring in an intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":7939,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"229-241"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10928844/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaae001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although previous systematic reviews have studied medication adherence interventions among people with Type 2 diabetes (PwT2D), no intervention has been found to improve medication adherence consistently. Furthermore, inconsistent and poor reporting of intervention description has made understanding, replication, and evaluation of intervention challenging.

Purpose: We aimed to identify the behavior change techniques (BCTs) and characteristics of successful medication adherence interventions among PwT2D.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted on Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials with BCT-codable interventions designed to influence adherence to anti-diabetic medication for PwT2D aged 18 years old and above and have medication adherence measure as an outcome.

Results: Fifty-five studies were included. Successful interventions tend to target medication adherence only, involve pharmacists as the interventionist, contain "Credible source" (BCT 9.1), "Instruction on how to perform the behaviour" (BCT 4.1), "Social support (practical)" (BCT 3.2), "Action planning" (BCT 1.4), and/ or "Information about health consequences" (BCT 5.1). Very few interventions described its context, used theory, examined adherence outcomes during the follow-up period after an intervention has ended, or were tailored to address specific barriers of medication adherence.

Conclusion: We identified specific BCTs and characteristics that are commonly reported in successful medication adherence interventions, which can facilitate the development of future interventions. Our review highlighted the need to consider and clearly describe different dimensions of context, theory, fidelity, and tailoring in an intervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对 2 型糖尿病患者用药依从性干预研究中行为改变技术的系统性回顾。
背景:尽管之前的系统综述研究了 2 型糖尿病患者(PwT2D)的服药依从性干预措施,但并未发现任何干预措施能持续改善服药依从性。目的:我们旨在确定行为改变技术(BCTs)以及在 2 型糖尿病患者中成功实施的服药依从性干预措施的特点:我们在 Medline、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、Web of Science 和 Scopus 上进行了系统检索。纳入的研究均为随机对照试验,这些试验采用 BCT 编码的干预措施,旨在影响 18 岁及以上 PwT2D 抗糖尿病药物治疗的依从性,并将药物治疗依从性作为一项结果:结果:共纳入 55 项研究。成功的干预措施往往只针对服药依从性,由药剂师作为干预者,包含 "可靠来源"(BCT 9.1)、"指导如何实施行为"(BCT 4.1)、"社会支持(实际)"(BCT 3.2)、"行动规划"(BCT 1.4)和/或 "有关健康后果的信息"(BCT 5.1)。只有极少数干预措施描述了其背景、使用了理论、研究了干预结束后随访期间的依从性结果,或专门针对特定的服药障碍:我们发现了成功的坚持用药干预措施中常见的特定BCT和特征,这有助于未来干预措施的开发。我们的综述强调了考虑并明确描述干预措施的背景、理论、忠实性和定制等不同方面的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Annals of Behavioral Medicine PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Annals of Behavioral Medicine aims to foster the exchange of knowledge derived from the disciplines involved in the field of behavioral medicine, and the integration of biological, psychosocial, and behavioral factors and principles as they relate to such areas as health promotion, disease prevention, risk factor modification, disease progression, adjustment and adaptation to physical disorders, and rehabilitation. To achieve these goals, much of the journal is devoted to the publication of original empirical articles including reports of randomized controlled trials, observational studies, or other basic and clinical investigations. Integrative reviews of the evidence for the application of behavioral interventions in health care will also be provided. .
期刊最新文献
Women's Relationships With Healthcare and Providers: The Role of Weight Stigma in Healthcare and Weight Bias Internalization. Associations Between the Superwoman Schema, Stress, and Cardiovascular Health Among African-American Women. The Relationship Between Loneliness, Social Isolation, and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Narrative Review. Increases in Psychological Stress Are Associated With Higher Fasting Glucose in US Chinese Immigrants. Correction: POSTER SESSION C: EXPLORING THE MODERATING ROLE OF SOCIAL MEDIA USAGE ON MOTIVATION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1