Rachel Gatti Armani, Aluizio Barbosa Carvalho, Monique Vercia Rocha E Silva, Renata Verardino, Luiz Bortolotto, Maria Eugenia F Canziani
{"title":"Effect of Hemodialysis with Medium Cut-Off versus High-Flux Membranes on Endothelial Function of Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.","authors":"Rachel Gatti Armani, Aluizio Barbosa Carvalho, Monique Vercia Rocha E Silva, Renata Verardino, Luiz Bortolotto, Maria Eugenia F Canziani","doi":"10.1159/000537679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endothelial dysfunction (ED) is considered a marker of vascular complications, especially in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Inflammation and the uremic state contribute to ED in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). Recently, the medium cut-off (MCO) dialysis membrane has been proposed to efficiently remove inflammatory cytokines and large, middle-sized uremic toxins, with the potential effect to improve endothelial function. This study aimed to compare the effect of dialysis with MCO or high-flux membranes on the endothelial function of patients on chronic HD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, randomized, crossover study in which 32 patients with ESKD were dialyzed for 12 weeks with each membrane, including a 4-week washout period between treatments. Endothelial function was assessed by flow-mediated dilation (FMD) using brachial artery ultrasound at weeks 1, 12, 16, and 28.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The population consisted of 59% men, 52.7 ± 13.4 years, 16% non-black, on HD for 8.8 (4.1-15.1) years, and 72% with arteriovenous fistula. Hypertension was the most common etiology of chronic kidney disease, and 34% of patients had previous cardiovascular disease. Patients were grouped, regardless of treatment sequence, into MCO or high-flux groups, since no carryover (p = 0.634) or sequence (p = 0.998) effects were observed in the FMD assessment. The ANOVA model with repeated measures showed no effects of treatment (p = 0.426), time (p = 0.972), or interaction (p = 0.413) in the comparison of FMD between the MCO and high-flux groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dialysis performed with MCO, or high-flux membranes, had no influence on endothelial function in patients undergoing HD. However, a trend towards increased FMD was observed with the use of the MCO membrane.</p>","PeriodicalId":8953,"journal":{"name":"Blood Purification","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Purification","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000537679","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Endothelial dysfunction (ED) is considered a marker of vascular complications, especially in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Inflammation and the uremic state contribute to ED in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). Recently, the medium cut-off (MCO) dialysis membrane has been proposed to efficiently remove inflammatory cytokines and large, middle-sized uremic toxins, with the potential effect to improve endothelial function. This study aimed to compare the effect of dialysis with MCO or high-flux membranes on the endothelial function of patients on chronic HD.
Methods: A prospective, randomized, crossover study in which 32 patients with ESKD were dialyzed for 12 weeks with each membrane, including a 4-week washout period between treatments. Endothelial function was assessed by flow-mediated dilation (FMD) using brachial artery ultrasound at weeks 1, 12, 16, and 28.
Results: The population consisted of 59% men, 52.7 ± 13.4 years, 16% non-black, on HD for 8.8 (4.1-15.1) years, and 72% with arteriovenous fistula. Hypertension was the most common etiology of chronic kidney disease, and 34% of patients had previous cardiovascular disease. Patients were grouped, regardless of treatment sequence, into MCO or high-flux groups, since no carryover (p = 0.634) or sequence (p = 0.998) effects were observed in the FMD assessment. The ANOVA model with repeated measures showed no effects of treatment (p = 0.426), time (p = 0.972), or interaction (p = 0.413) in the comparison of FMD between the MCO and high-flux groups.
Conclusion: Dialysis performed with MCO, or high-flux membranes, had no influence on endothelial function in patients undergoing HD. However, a trend towards increased FMD was observed with the use of the MCO membrane.
期刊介绍:
Practical information on hemodialysis, hemofiltration, peritoneal dialysis and apheresis is featured in this journal. Recognizing the critical importance of equipment and procedures, particular emphasis has been placed on reports, drawn from a wide range of fields, describing technical advances and improvements in methodology. Papers reflect the search for cost-effective solutions which increase not only patient survival but also patient comfort and disease improvement through prevention or correction of undesirable effects. Advances in vascular access and blood anticoagulation, problems associated with exposure of blood to foreign surfaces and acute-care nephrology, including continuous therapies, also receive attention. Nephrologists, internists, intensivists and hospital staff involved in dialysis, apheresis and immunoadsorption for acute and chronic solid organ failure will find this journal useful and informative. ''Blood Purification'' also serves as a platform for multidisciplinary experiences involving nephrologists, cardiologists and critical care physicians in order to expand the level of interaction between different disciplines and specialities.