Cortical sensory gating and reactions to dynamic speech-in-noise in older normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY International Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-09 DOI:10.1080/14992027.2024.2311663
Christopher Slugocki, Francis Kuk, Petri Korhonen
{"title":"Cortical sensory gating and reactions to dynamic speech-in-noise in older normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults.","authors":"Christopher Slugocki, Francis Kuk, Petri Korhonen","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2311663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine whether cortical sensory gating predicts how older adults with and without hearing loss perform the Tracking of Noise Tolerance (TNT) test.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-blind mixed design. TNT performance was defined by average tolerated noise relative to speech levels (TNT<sub>Ave</sub>) and by an average range of noise levels over a two-minute trial (excursion). Sensory gating of P1-N1-P2 components was measured using pairs of 1 kHz tone pips.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Twenty-three normal-hearing (NH) and 16 hearing-impaired (HI) older adults with a moderate-to-severe degree of sensorineural hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NH listeners tolerated significantly more noise than HI listeners, but the two groups did not differ in their excursion. Both NH and HI listeners exhibited significant gating of P1 amplitudes and N1P2 peak-to-peak amplitudes with no difference in gating magnitudes between listener groups. Sensory gating magnitudes of P1 and N1P2 did not predict TNT<sub>Ave</sub> scores, but N1P2 gating negatively predicted excursion after accounting for listener age and hearing thresholds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Listeners' reactivity to a roving noise (excursion), but not their average noise tolerance (TNT<sub>Ave</sub>), was predicted by sensory gating at N1P2 generators. These results suggest that temporal aspects of speech-in-noise processing may be affected by declines in the central inhibition of older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"70-79"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2311663","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether cortical sensory gating predicts how older adults with and without hearing loss perform the Tracking of Noise Tolerance (TNT) test.

Design: Single-blind mixed design. TNT performance was defined by average tolerated noise relative to speech levels (TNTAve) and by an average range of noise levels over a two-minute trial (excursion). Sensory gating of P1-N1-P2 components was measured using pairs of 1 kHz tone pips.

Study sample: Twenty-three normal-hearing (NH) and 16 hearing-impaired (HI) older adults with a moderate-to-severe degree of sensorineural hearing loss.

Results: NH listeners tolerated significantly more noise than HI listeners, but the two groups did not differ in their excursion. Both NH and HI listeners exhibited significant gating of P1 amplitudes and N1P2 peak-to-peak amplitudes with no difference in gating magnitudes between listener groups. Sensory gating magnitudes of P1 and N1P2 did not predict TNTAve scores, but N1P2 gating negatively predicted excursion after accounting for listener age and hearing thresholds.

Conclusions: Listeners' reactivity to a roving noise (excursion), but not their average noise tolerance (TNTAve), was predicted by sensory gating at N1P2 generators. These results suggest that temporal aspects of speech-in-noise processing may be affected by declines in the central inhibition of older adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
听力正常和听力受损的老年人皮层感觉门控和对动态噪音语音的反应。
目的研究大脑皮层感觉门控是否能预测有听力损失和无听力损失的老年人如何进行噪声耐受跟踪(TNT)测试:设计:单盲混合设计。TNT成绩由相对于语音水平的平均噪音耐受水平(TNTAve)和两分钟试验中噪音水平的平均范围(偏移)来定义。研究样本:研究样本:23 名听力正常(NH)和 16 名听力受损(HI)的中重度感音神经性听力损失老年人:结果:听力正常的听者比听力受损的听者能忍受的噪音明显要多,但两组听者的偏移量并无差异。NH 和 HI 听者的 P1 振幅和 N1P2 峰-峰振幅均表现出明显的门控,听者组之间的门控幅度没有差异。P1 和 N1P2 的感觉门控幅度不能预测 TNTAve 分数,但 N1P2 门控在考虑听者年龄和听阈后对偏移有负面预测作用:结论:听者对巡回噪音的反应(偏移),而不是他们的平均噪音耐受性(TNTAve),可以通过 N1P2 发生器的感觉门控来预测。这些结果表明,噪声中语音处理的时间方面可能会受到老年人中枢抑制功能下降的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
期刊最新文献
What factors do health professionals view as influencing the success of otitis media detection programs for First Nations children? A scoping review and synthesis of qualitative research. Effect of pre-school sound exposure on children's hearing function: results from preparatory studies assessing hearing function by distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Hearing aid wear time and its impact on vocabulary in preschoolers with moderately severe to profound hearing loss. Effect of reducing electrical stimulation rate on hearing performance of Nucleus® cochlear implant recipients. What's in a name? A systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of non-medical amplification devices in adults with mild and moderate hearing losses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1