Comparison of real-time quantitative PCR and two digital PCR platforms to detect copy number variation in FCGR3B

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of immunological methods Pub Date : 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jim.2024.113628
Kirstine Kløve-Mogensen , Simone Karlsson Terp , Rudi Steffensen
{"title":"Comparison of real-time quantitative PCR and two digital PCR platforms to detect copy number variation in FCGR3B","authors":"Kirstine Kløve-Mogensen ,&nbsp;Simone Karlsson Terp ,&nbsp;Rudi Steffensen","doi":"10.1016/j.jim.2024.113628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The importance of structural genetic variants, such as copy number variations (CNVs), in modulating human disease is being increasingly recognized. Several clinical conditions require investigation of human neutrophil antigen (HNA-1), which is encoded by the Fc gamma receptor IIIb gene (<em>FCGR3B)</em>, including suspicion of neutropenia, infections, and proactive testing of blood component donors to reduce the potential risk in transfusion. In this study, we compared real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) with two digital PCR (dPCR) platforms, namely droplet digital PCR and an array-based platform, to determine copy numbers (CNs) in <em>FCGR3B</em>. We initially tested 400 anonymous blood donors with qPCR using a commercially available TaqMan probe assay (Applied Biosystems) on a Quant Studio 12 Flex. CNs was determined for all 400 tested individuals with CNs ranging from zero to four. Zero copies were detected in 0.2% (1/400), one copy was detected in 3.8% (15/400), two copies were detected in 87.8% (351/400), three copies were detected in 8.0% (32/400), and four copies were detected in 0.2% (1/400) of tested individuals. From this cohort, we selected 32 donors with CNs from zero to four for analyses with Digital Real-Time PCR (dPCR) using Lab on an array (LOAA) on an On-Point analyzer from Optolane Technologies Inc. and the Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR) platform from Bio-Rad Laboratories. We compared the obtained CNs of <em>FCGR3B</em> on the three platforms and found full concordance between the CNs obtained. We therefore conclude that all three platforms can be used for quantification of CNs for <em>FCGR3B</em>, and although dPCR has some advantages over qPCR, it was not necessary for reliably estimating CNs of the <em>FCGR3B</em> gene.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of immunological methods","volume":"526 ","pages":"Article 113628"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022175924000139/pdfft?md5=a003a1f78317bab841c0b1aef6d0e264&pid=1-s2.0-S0022175924000139-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of immunological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022175924000139","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The importance of structural genetic variants, such as copy number variations (CNVs), in modulating human disease is being increasingly recognized. Several clinical conditions require investigation of human neutrophil antigen (HNA-1), which is encoded by the Fc gamma receptor IIIb gene (FCGR3B), including suspicion of neutropenia, infections, and proactive testing of blood component donors to reduce the potential risk in transfusion. In this study, we compared real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) with two digital PCR (dPCR) platforms, namely droplet digital PCR and an array-based platform, to determine copy numbers (CNs) in FCGR3B. We initially tested 400 anonymous blood donors with qPCR using a commercially available TaqMan probe assay (Applied Biosystems) on a Quant Studio 12 Flex. CNs was determined for all 400 tested individuals with CNs ranging from zero to four. Zero copies were detected in 0.2% (1/400), one copy was detected in 3.8% (15/400), two copies were detected in 87.8% (351/400), three copies were detected in 8.0% (32/400), and four copies were detected in 0.2% (1/400) of tested individuals. From this cohort, we selected 32 donors with CNs from zero to four for analyses with Digital Real-Time PCR (dPCR) using Lab on an array (LOAA) on an On-Point analyzer from Optolane Technologies Inc. and the Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR) platform from Bio-Rad Laboratories. We compared the obtained CNs of FCGR3B on the three platforms and found full concordance between the CNs obtained. We therefore conclude that all three platforms can be used for quantification of CNs for FCGR3B, and although dPCR has some advantages over qPCR, it was not necessary for reliably estimating CNs of the FCGR3B gene.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较实时定量 PCR 和两种数字 PCR 平台检测 FCGR3B 的拷贝数变异。
拷贝数变异(CNV)等结构性遗传变异在调节人类疾病方面的重要性正日益得到认可。有几种临床情况需要对由 Fc γ 受体 IIIb 基因(FCGR3B)编码的人类中性粒细胞抗原(HNA-1)进行检测,包括怀疑中性粒细胞减少症、感染以及对血液成分捐献者进行主动检测以降低输血的潜在风险。在这项研究中,我们比较了实时定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)和两种数字 PCR(dPCR)平台,即液滴数字 PCR 和基于阵列的平台,以确定 FCGR3B 中的 CNV。我们首先在 Quant Studio 12 Flex 上使用市售 TaqMan 探针测定法(Applied Biosystems)对 400 名匿名献血者进行了 qPCR 检测。所有 400 名受测者的 CNV 均已确定,拷贝数从 0 到 4 不等。0拷贝检测率为 0.2%(1/400),1 拷贝检测率为 3.8%(15/400),2 拷贝检测率为 87.8%(351/400),3 拷贝检测率为 8.0%(32/400),4 拷贝检测率为 0.2%(1/400)。我们从中挑选了 32 名拷贝数为 0 到 4 的供体,在 Optolane Technologies Inc. 的 On-Point 分析仪和 Bio-Rad Laboratories 的液滴数字 PCR (ddPCR) 平台上使用阵列实验室 (LOAA) 进行数字实时 PCR (dPCR) 分析。我们比较了在这三种平台上获得的 FCGR3B 拷贝数,发现获得的拷贝数完全一致。因此,我们得出结论:这三种平台都可用于量化 FCGR3B 的拷贝数,虽然 dPCR 比 qPCR 有一些优势,但它并不是可靠估计 FCGR3B 基因 CNV 所必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
120
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Immunological Methods is devoted to covering techniques for: (1) Quantitating and detecting antibodies and/or antigens. (2) Purifying immunoglobulins, lymphokines and other molecules of the immune system. (3) Isolating antigens and other substances important in immunological processes. (4) Labelling antigens and antibodies. (5) Localizing antigens and/or antibodies in tissues and cells. (6) Detecting, and fractionating immunocompetent cells. (7) Assaying for cellular immunity. (8) Documenting cell-cell interactions. (9) Initiating immunity and unresponsiveness. (10) Transplanting tissues. (11) Studying items closely related to immunity such as complement, reticuloendothelial system and others. (12) Molecular techniques for studying immune cells and their receptors. (13) Imaging of the immune system. (14) Methods for production or their fragments in eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells. In addition the journal will publish articles on novel methods for analysing the organization, structure and expression of genes for immunologically important molecules such as immunoglobulins, T cell receptors and accessory molecules involved in antigen recognition, processing and presentation. Submitted full length manuscripts should describe new methods of broad applicability to immunology and not simply the application of an established method to a particular substance - although papers describing such applications may be considered for publication as a short Technical Note. Review articles will also be published by the Journal of Immunological Methods. In general these manuscripts are by solicitation however anyone interested in submitting a review can contact the Reviews Editor and provide an outline of the proposed review.
期刊最新文献
Isolation of anti-Ancylostoma-secreted protein 5 (ASP5) antibody from a naïve antibody phage library. Inducing and regulating human naive CD4+ t cell proliferation by different antigen presenting cells. Workflow improvement and financial gain after integration of high-throughput sample processing system with flow cytometer in a high-volume pathology laboratory: Results from a prospective comparative study using Lean principles Development of an ELISA for an effective potency determination of recombinant rabies human monoclonal antibody A note of caution for using calmodulin antibodies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1