Oncological outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the value of PSA density as a preoperative predictive factor.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Urology Pub Date : 2024-02-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562872241229250
Roser Vives Dilme, Juan Gómez Rivas, Laura Fernández Hernández, Irene De la Parra Sánchez, Rafael Sánchez Del Hoyo, María Isabel Galante Romo, Enrique Redondo González, José Luis Senovilla Pérez, Lorena Fernández Montarroso, Jesús Moreno Sierra
{"title":"Oncological outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the value of PSA density as a preoperative predictive factor.","authors":"Roser Vives Dilme, Juan Gómez Rivas, Laura Fernández Hernández, Irene De la Parra Sánchez, Rafael Sánchez Del Hoyo, María Isabel Galante Romo, Enrique Redondo González, José Luis Senovilla Pérez, Lorena Fernández Montarroso, Jesús Moreno Sierra","doi":"10.1177/17562872241229250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pretreatment assessment of patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (PCa) is essential for therapeutic decision-making. Currently available staging systems based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, and clinical stage allow for determining the prognostic characteristics of these patients. Several studies have evaluated the preoperative use of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) as a prognostic factor for further risk stratification. To date, the role of PSAD in this setting is still an object of debate.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present analysis aimed to assess the predictive potential of PSAD for adverse oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and to compare its accuracy to preoperative PSA (pPSA).</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 427 patients diagnosed with localized PCa who underwent RARP at a single institution between January 2015 and January 2020. Generating receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, calculating areas under the curves (AUCs), and using a linear regression model, we analyzed the association of PSAD and pPSA with postoperative positive surgical margins (PSM), Gleason score ⩾ 7, persistent PSA, and biochemical recurrence (BCR), with a median follow-up of 47 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PSAD showed a significant association with PSM (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), PSA persistence (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), and Gleason ⩾ 7 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), without being statistically significant in predicting BCR (<i>p</i> = 0.098). The predictive value of PSAD was comparable to pPSA for outcomes of PSA persistence (AUC 0.727 <i>versus</i> 0.771) and Gleason ⩾ 7 (AUC 0.683 <i>versus</i> 0.649).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PSAD is a predictive factor for postoperative oncological outcomes of PSM, Gleason score ⩾ 7, and persistence of PSA. Despite the need for further studies, PSAD could be useful as a prognostic parameter in conjunction with established staging systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":"16 ","pages":"17562872241229250"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10851720/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872241229250","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pretreatment assessment of patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (PCa) is essential for therapeutic decision-making. Currently available staging systems based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, and clinical stage allow for determining the prognostic characteristics of these patients. Several studies have evaluated the preoperative use of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) as a prognostic factor for further risk stratification. To date, the role of PSAD in this setting is still an object of debate.

Objectives: The present analysis aimed to assess the predictive potential of PSAD for adverse oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and to compare its accuracy to preoperative PSA (pPSA).

Design and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 427 patients diagnosed with localized PCa who underwent RARP at a single institution between January 2015 and January 2020. Generating receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, calculating areas under the curves (AUCs), and using a linear regression model, we analyzed the association of PSAD and pPSA with postoperative positive surgical margins (PSM), Gleason score ⩾ 7, persistent PSA, and biochemical recurrence (BCR), with a median follow-up of 47 months.

Results: PSAD showed a significant association with PSM (p < 0.0001), PSA persistence (p < 0.0001), and Gleason ⩾ 7 (p < 0.0001), without being statistically significant in predicting BCR (p = 0.098). The predictive value of PSAD was comparable to pPSA for outcomes of PSA persistence (AUC 0.727 versus 0.771) and Gleason ⩾ 7 (AUC 0.683 versus 0.649).

Conclusion: PSAD is a predictive factor for postoperative oncological outcomes of PSM, Gleason score ⩾ 7, and persistence of PSA. Despite the need for further studies, PSAD could be useful as a prognostic parameter in conjunction with established staging systems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术的肿瘤预后:PSA密度作为术前预测因素的价值。
背景:对确诊为局部前列腺癌(PCa)的患者进行治疗前评估对于治疗决策至关重要。目前可用的基于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、格里森评分和临床分期的分期系统可以确定这些患者的预后特征。有几项研究对术前使用前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSAD)作为进一步风险分层的预后因素进行了评估。迄今为止,PSAD 在这种情况下的作用仍存在争议:本分析旨在评估 PSAD 对机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术(RARP)后不良肿瘤结果的预测潜力,并将其准确性与术前 PSA(pPSA)进行比较:我们回顾性分析了2015年1月至2020年1月期间在一家机构接受RARP手术的427名确诊为局部PCa的患者。通过生成接收器操作者特征曲线(ROC)、计算曲线下面积(AUC)并使用线性回归模型,我们分析了PSAD和pPSA与术后手术切缘阳性(PSM)、Gleason评分⩾ 7、持续PSA和生化复发(BCR)的关系,中位随访时间为47个月:结果:PSAD 与 PSM 有明显相关性(p p p p = 0.098)。PSAD 对 PSA 持续率(AUC 0.727 对 0.771)和 Gleason ⩾ 7(AUC 0.683 对 0.649)结果的预测价值与 pPSA 相当:PSAD是PSM术后肿瘤结局、Gleason评分⩾ 7和PSA持续存在的预测因素。尽管还需要进一步研究,但 PSAD 仍可作为预后参数与既定的分期系统结合使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Urology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of urology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in urology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest across all areas of urology, including treatment of urological disorders, with a focus on emerging pharmacological therapies.
期刊最新文献
Metaverse surgical planning for robotic surgery: preliminary experience and users' perception. Traumatic ureteral injury: an initial outcome and experience. HoloLens® platform for healthcare professionals simulation training, teaching, and its urological applications: an up-to-date review. Plain Language Summary of Publication: Does crushing vibegron 75 mg tablet affect its safety or the amount of vibegron in the body over time in healthy adults? Comparison of surgical outcomes of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate using different energies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1