Roser Vives Dilme, Juan Gómez Rivas, Laura Fernández Hernández, Irene De la Parra Sánchez, Rafael Sánchez Del Hoyo, María Isabel Galante Romo, Enrique Redondo González, José Luis Senovilla Pérez, Lorena Fernández Montarroso, Jesús Moreno Sierra
{"title":"Oncological outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the value of PSA density as a preoperative predictive factor.","authors":"Roser Vives Dilme, Juan Gómez Rivas, Laura Fernández Hernández, Irene De la Parra Sánchez, Rafael Sánchez Del Hoyo, María Isabel Galante Romo, Enrique Redondo González, José Luis Senovilla Pérez, Lorena Fernández Montarroso, Jesús Moreno Sierra","doi":"10.1177/17562872241229250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pretreatment assessment of patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (PCa) is essential for therapeutic decision-making. Currently available staging systems based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, and clinical stage allow for determining the prognostic characteristics of these patients. Several studies have evaluated the preoperative use of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) as a prognostic factor for further risk stratification. To date, the role of PSAD in this setting is still an object of debate.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present analysis aimed to assess the predictive potential of PSAD for adverse oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and to compare its accuracy to preoperative PSA (pPSA).</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 427 patients diagnosed with localized PCa who underwent RARP at a single institution between January 2015 and January 2020. Generating receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, calculating areas under the curves (AUCs), and using a linear regression model, we analyzed the association of PSAD and pPSA with postoperative positive surgical margins (PSM), Gleason score ⩾ 7, persistent PSA, and biochemical recurrence (BCR), with a median follow-up of 47 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PSAD showed a significant association with PSM (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), PSA persistence (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), and Gleason ⩾ 7 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), without being statistically significant in predicting BCR (<i>p</i> = 0.098). The predictive value of PSAD was comparable to pPSA for outcomes of PSA persistence (AUC 0.727 <i>versus</i> 0.771) and Gleason ⩾ 7 (AUC 0.683 <i>versus</i> 0.649).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PSAD is a predictive factor for postoperative oncological outcomes of PSM, Gleason score ⩾ 7, and persistence of PSA. Despite the need for further studies, PSAD could be useful as a prognostic parameter in conjunction with established staging systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":"16 ","pages":"17562872241229250"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10851720/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872241229250","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Pretreatment assessment of patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (PCa) is essential for therapeutic decision-making. Currently available staging systems based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, and clinical stage allow for determining the prognostic characteristics of these patients. Several studies have evaluated the preoperative use of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) as a prognostic factor for further risk stratification. To date, the role of PSAD in this setting is still an object of debate.
Objectives: The present analysis aimed to assess the predictive potential of PSAD for adverse oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and to compare its accuracy to preoperative PSA (pPSA).
Design and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 427 patients diagnosed with localized PCa who underwent RARP at a single institution between January 2015 and January 2020. Generating receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, calculating areas under the curves (AUCs), and using a linear regression model, we analyzed the association of PSAD and pPSA with postoperative positive surgical margins (PSM), Gleason score ⩾ 7, persistent PSA, and biochemical recurrence (BCR), with a median follow-up of 47 months.
Results: PSAD showed a significant association with PSM (p < 0.0001), PSA persistence (p < 0.0001), and Gleason ⩾ 7 (p < 0.0001), without being statistically significant in predicting BCR (p = 0.098). The predictive value of PSAD was comparable to pPSA for outcomes of PSA persistence (AUC 0.727 versus 0.771) and Gleason ⩾ 7 (AUC 0.683 versus 0.649).
Conclusion: PSAD is a predictive factor for postoperative oncological outcomes of PSM, Gleason score ⩾ 7, and persistence of PSA. Despite the need for further studies, PSAD could be useful as a prognostic parameter in conjunction with established staging systems.
期刊介绍:
Therapeutic Advances in Urology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of urology.
The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in urology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest across all areas of urology, including treatment of urological disorders, with a focus on emerging pharmacological therapies.