What next for behaviour change professional development in general practice? Insights from an environmental scan and workshops.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-07-29 Print Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0187
Bryce Brickley, Jenny Advocat, Tze Lin Chai, Mitchell Bowden, Elizabeth Rieger, Lauren Ball, Raeann Ng, Nilakshi Gunatillaka, Elizabeth Ann Sturgiss
{"title":"What next for behaviour change professional development in general practice? Insights from an environmental scan and workshops.","authors":"Bryce Brickley, Jenny Advocat, Tze Lin Chai, Mitchell Bowden, Elizabeth Rieger, Lauren Ball, Raeann Ng, Nilakshi Gunatillaka, Elizabeth Ann Sturgiss","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A key role of general practice professionals (that is, GPs, and general practice nurses [GPNs]) is to support patients to change behaviours. Traditional approaches to assisting patients with, and learning about, behaviour change have modest outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore behaviour change with GPs and GPNs and the availability of related professional development (PD) opportunities.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Multi-methods study comprising an environmental scan survey of behaviour change tools and PD opportunities, and online workshops with Australian GPs and GPNs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Survey data were analysed using qualitative content analysis, informing the design of the workshops. Workshop data included observation, note-taking, and collaborative reflection, which were analysed thematically and synthesised with survey data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey had 18 complete responses. For the two virtual workshops, workshop 1 had 16 participants and workshop 2 had eight participants. There was diversity in awareness of existing behaviour change tools and resources. Preferences for future tools and PD opportunities related to specific aspects of its design, content, activities, and delivery. The following three themes developed from the workshop data: recognising the importance of relationships; recognising the importance of continuity; and keeping context in mind. In the absence of tools and resources, GPs and GPNs discussed behaviour change as something that occurs best through a patient-centred alliance that is continuing, respectful, grounded in trust and an understanding of their patient, and prioritises patient autonomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future general practice behaviour change PD should support clinicians to 'assist' patients and recognise the social and contextual influences on behaviour.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A key role of general practice professionals (that is, GPs, and general practice nurses [GPNs]) is to support patients to change behaviours. Traditional approaches to assisting patients with, and learning about, behaviour change have modest outcomes.

Aim: To explore behaviour change with GPs and GPNs and the availability of related professional development (PD) opportunities.

Design & setting: Multi-methods study comprising an environmental scan survey of behaviour change tools and PD opportunities, and online workshops with Australian GPs and GPNs.

Method: Survey data were analysed using qualitative content analysis, informing the design of the workshops. Workshop data included observation, note-taking, and collaborative reflection, which were analysed thematically and synthesised with survey data.

Results: The survey had 18 complete responses. For the two virtual workshops, workshop 1 had 16 participants and workshop 2 had eight participants. There was diversity in awareness of existing behaviour change tools and resources. Preferences for future tools and PD opportunities related to specific aspects of its design, content, activities, and delivery. The following three themes developed from the workshop data: recognising the importance of relationships; recognising the importance of continuity; and keeping context in mind. In the absence of tools and resources, GPs and GPNs discussed behaviour change as something that occurs best through a patient-centred alliance that is continuing, respectful, grounded in trust and an understanding of their patient, and prioritises patient autonomy.

Conclusion: Future general practice behaviour change PD should support clinicians to 'assist' patients and recognise the social and contextual influences on behaviour.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全科医学行为改变专业发展的下一步是什么? 从环境扫描和研讨会中获得的启示。
背景:全科专业人员(即全科医生和全科护士)的一个重要职责是帮助患者改变行为。目的:探讨全科医生和全科护士的行为改变以及相关专业发展(PD)机会的可用性:多方法研究,包括行为改变工具和专业发展机会的环境扫描调查,以及与澳大利亚全科医生和全科护士的在线研讨会:采用定性内容分析法对调查数据进行分析,为研讨会的设计提供信息。研讨会数据包括:观察、笔记和合作反思,对这些数据进行主题分析,并与调查数据进行综合:调查反馈(n=18)和两次虚拟研讨会(W1 n=30,W2 n=8)。对现有行为改变工具和资源的认识存在多样性。对未来工具和培训机会的偏好与其设计、内容、活动和交付的具体方面有关。从研讨会的数据中得出了三个与关系、连续性和背景有关的主题。在缺乏工具和资源的情况下,全科医生和全科护士在我们的研究中讨论了行为改变的最佳方式,即通过以患者为中心的联盟,持续、尊重、基于信任和对患者的理解,并优先考虑患者的自主权。未来的全科行为改变项目应支持临床医生 "协助 "患者,并认识到社会和环境对行为的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correction: Exploring the facilitators and barriers to addressing social media's impact on anxiety within primary care: a qualitative study. Action on elevated natriuretic peptide in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. Identifying where hospital and community trusts are managing general practices in England: a service mapping study. 'ThinkCancer!': randomised feasibility trial of a novel practice-based early cancer diagnosis intervention. Signs and symptoms of serious illness in adults with acute abdominal pain presenting to ambulatory care: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1