Development of a Discharge Counseling and Medication Reconciliation Process for Pediatric Patients Within a Large, Academic Health System.

Q2 Medicine Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-07 DOI:10.5863/1551-6776-29.1.76
Tamara Hernandez, Daniela Barisano, Chelsea Welsh, Joseph Rosano, Talia Papiro
{"title":"Development of a Discharge Counseling and Medication Reconciliation Process for Pediatric Patients Within a Large, Academic Health System.","authors":"Tamara Hernandez, Daniela Barisano, Chelsea Welsh, Joseph Rosano, Talia Papiro","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.1.76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to characterize the impact of a pharmacist-driven discharge medication reconciliation and counseling program targeting high-risk pediatric patients to mitigate barriers in transitions of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center quality improvement initiative including high-risk pediatric patients within a large academic medical center. Pharmacy, medical, and information technology team members developed a scoring system to identify patients at high risk of hospital readmission that resulted in a trigger tool built within the electronic medical record (EMR). Pharmacy workflow, the EMR documentation, and staff training were implemented. The primary end point was the number of high-risk patients with complete medication reconciliation and/or discharge counseling performed during the first 2 months after implementation. The secondary end points included quantification and qualification of the interventions conducted by a pharmacist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pediatric clinical pharmacists conducted discharge medication reconciliation and/or counseling for 60 patients during the first 2 months after implementation. There were 65 interventions performed, including 60 discharge medication reconciliations and 5 discharge counseling sessions. Of these interventions, 22 were recommendations on appropriate medication dosing and frequency (37%), 12 on duration of therapy (20%), and 8 were medication additions (13%). There were 6 interventions on adherence assistance (10%), 6 involved selection of medication formulation (10%), 3 involved medication discontinuation (5%), 2 involved appropriate therapy selection (3%), and 1 involved medication stability (1%). All interventions were accepted and implemented by the prescribing providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pharmacist-driven discharge medication reconciliation and counseling programs targeting pediatric high-risk population might be an effective tool to mitigate gaps in transitions of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10849681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-29.1.76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to characterize the impact of a pharmacist-driven discharge medication reconciliation and counseling program targeting high-risk pediatric patients to mitigate barriers in transitions of care.

Methods: This was a single-center quality improvement initiative including high-risk pediatric patients within a large academic medical center. Pharmacy, medical, and information technology team members developed a scoring system to identify patients at high risk of hospital readmission that resulted in a trigger tool built within the electronic medical record (EMR). Pharmacy workflow, the EMR documentation, and staff training were implemented. The primary end point was the number of high-risk patients with complete medication reconciliation and/or discharge counseling performed during the first 2 months after implementation. The secondary end points included quantification and qualification of the interventions conducted by a pharmacist.

Results: Pediatric clinical pharmacists conducted discharge medication reconciliation and/or counseling for 60 patients during the first 2 months after implementation. There were 65 interventions performed, including 60 discharge medication reconciliations and 5 discharge counseling sessions. Of these interventions, 22 were recommendations on appropriate medication dosing and frequency (37%), 12 on duration of therapy (20%), and 8 were medication additions (13%). There were 6 interventions on adherence assistance (10%), 6 involved selection of medication formulation (10%), 3 involved medication discontinuation (5%), 2 involved appropriate therapy selection (3%), and 1 involved medication stability (1%). All interventions were accepted and implemented by the prescribing providers.

Conclusions: Pharmacist-driven discharge medication reconciliation and counseling programs targeting pediatric high-risk population might be an effective tool to mitigate gaps in transitions of care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在大型学术医疗系统内为儿科患者制定出院咨询和药物调配流程。
目的:本研究旨在分析药剂师驱动的出院药物调节和咨询项目对高风险儿科患者的影响:本研究旨在描述药剂师驱动的出院用药调节和咨询项目对高风险儿科患者的影响,以减少护理过渡中的障碍:这是一项单中心质量改进计划,涉及一家大型学术医疗中心的高风险儿科患者。药房、医疗和信息技术团队成员开发了一套评分系统,用于识别再入院的高风险患者,并在电子病历(EMR)中建立了一个触发工具。药房工作流程、EMR 文档和员工培训均已实施。主要终点是在实施后的头两个月内完成药物调节和/或出院咨询的高风险患者人数。次要终点包括对药剂师所采取干预措施的量化和鉴定:结果:儿科临床药师在实施后的头 2 个月内为 60 名患者进行了出院用药调节和/或咨询。共进行了 65 次干预,包括 60 次出院用药核对和 5 次出院咨询。在这些干预措施中,22 项是关于适当用药剂量和频率的建议(37%),12 项是关于疗程的建议(20%),8 项是药物补充(13%)。有 6 项干预涉及协助坚持用药(10%),6 项涉及选择药物配方(10%),3 项涉及停药(5%),2 项涉及选择适当的疗法(3%),1 项涉及药物稳定性(1%)。所有干预措施均被处方提供者接受并实施:结论:针对儿科高危人群的药剂师驱动的出院用药调节和咨询项目可能是减少护理过渡缺口的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics is the official journal of the Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group. JPPT is a peer-reviewed multi disciplinary journal that is devoted to promoting the safe and effective use of medications in infants and children. To this end, the journal publishes practical information for all practitioners who provide care to pediatric patients. Each issue includes review articles, original clinical investigations, case reports, editorials, and other information relevant to pediatric medication therapy. The Journal focuses all work on issues related to the practice of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics. The scope of content includes pharmacotherapy, extemporaneous compounding, dosing, methods of medication administration, medication error prevention, and legislative issues. The Journal will contain original research, review articles, short subjects, case reports, clinical investigations, editorials, and news from such organizations as the Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group, the FDA, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, and so on.
期刊最新文献
A Retrospective Analysis of Micafungin Prophylaxis in Children Under 12 Years Undergoing Chemotherapy or Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. AI-Assisted Academia: Navigating the Nuances of Peer Review With ChatGPT 4. An Analysis of pH and Sugar Content of Commonly Prescribed Pediatric Liquid Medications: The Current Indian Scenario. Artificial Intelligence Opportunities to Guide Precision Dosing Strategies. Characterization of Awareness and Depth of Blockade During Neuromuscular Blockade Infusions in Critically Ill Children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1