The Effects of Peer Education on Treatment Adherence among Patients Receiving Hemodialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1 Q3 NURSING Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research Pub Date : 2024-01-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_155_22
Alireza Irajpour, Maryam Sadat Hashemi, Parvaneh Abazari, Shahrazad Shahidi
{"title":"The Effects of Peer Education on Treatment Adherence among Patients Receiving Hemodialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Alireza Irajpour, Maryam Sadat Hashemi, Parvaneh Abazari, Shahrazad Shahidi","doi":"10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_155_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-adherence to treatments increases the rates of hemodialysis complications, hospitalization, and mortality. One strategy for adherence improvement is peer education. This study aimed to investigate the effects of peer education on treatment adherence among patients receiving hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a randomized controlled trial. Patients in the control group were provided just with routine care, and the intervention group received peer education. Treatment adherence was assessed both before and after the intervention via the End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Adherence Questionnaire. Data analysis was conducted by the Chi-square, the Mann-Whitney U, the paired-sample <i>t</i>, and the independent-sample <i>t</i> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant between-group differences in terms of the pre-test mean scores of Adherence to regular attendance at hemodialysis sessions (t = 0.19, <i>p</i> = 0.85), Adherence to the prescribed medications (t = 0.46, <i>p</i> = 0.64), and Adherence to fluid restrictions (t = 0.24, <i>p</i> = 0.81). The same finding was observed after the intervention, except for the mean score of the adherence to fluid restrictions dimension which was significantly greater in the intervention group (t = 2.86, <i>p</i> = 0.006). Moreover, no significant changes were observed in the mean scores of treatment adherence dimensions in the control group. However, in the intervention group, the mean scores of the adherence to regular attendance at hemodialysis sessions (t = 3.79, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and the adherence to fluid restrictions dimensions were significantly greater than their pre-test values (t = 4.47, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Education by peer groups improves the compliance of patients with regard to the consumption of fluids in the interval between two dialysis sessions.</p>","PeriodicalId":44816,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10849281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_155_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Non-adherence to treatments increases the rates of hemodialysis complications, hospitalization, and mortality. One strategy for adherence improvement is peer education. This study aimed to investigate the effects of peer education on treatment adherence among patients receiving hemodialysis.

Materials and methods: This was a randomized controlled trial. Patients in the control group were provided just with routine care, and the intervention group received peer education. Treatment adherence was assessed both before and after the intervention via the End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Adherence Questionnaire. Data analysis was conducted by the Chi-square, the Mann-Whitney U, the paired-sample t, and the independent-sample t tests.

Results: There were no significant between-group differences in terms of the pre-test mean scores of Adherence to regular attendance at hemodialysis sessions (t = 0.19, p = 0.85), Adherence to the prescribed medications (t = 0.46, p = 0.64), and Adherence to fluid restrictions (t = 0.24, p = 0.81). The same finding was observed after the intervention, except for the mean score of the adherence to fluid restrictions dimension which was significantly greater in the intervention group (t = 2.86, p = 0.006). Moreover, no significant changes were observed in the mean scores of treatment adherence dimensions in the control group. However, in the intervention group, the mean scores of the adherence to regular attendance at hemodialysis sessions (t = 3.79, p < 0.001) and the adherence to fluid restrictions dimensions were significantly greater than their pre-test values (t = 4.47, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Education by peer groups improves the compliance of patients with regard to the consumption of fluids in the interval between two dialysis sessions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同伴教育对血液透析患者坚持治疗的影响:随机对照试验
背景:不坚持治疗会增加血液透析并发症、住院率和死亡率。同伴教育是提高治疗依从性的策略之一。本研究旨在调查同伴教育对血液透析患者坚持治疗的影响:这是一项随机对照试验。对照组患者只接受常规护理,干预组患者接受同伴教育。通过终末期肾病(ESRD)依从性问卷对干预前后的治疗依从性进行评估。数据分析采用卡方检验(Chi-square)、曼-惠特尼U检验(Mann-Whitney U)、配对样本t检验(paired-sample t)和独立样本t检验(independent-sample t):结果:在坚持定期参加血液透析疗程(t = 0.19,p = 0.85)、坚持遵医嘱用药(t = 0.46,p = 0.64)和坚持限制输液(t = 0.24,p = 0.81)的测试前平均得分方面,组间差异不明显。干预后也观察到了同样的结果,只是干预组在遵守液体限制维度上的平均得分明显更高(t = 2.86,p = 0.006)。此外,对照组在治疗依从性维度的平均得分上没有观察到明显变化。然而,在干预组中,坚持定期参加血液透析疗程(t = 3.79,p < 0.001)和坚持液体限制(t = 4.47,p < 0.001)的平均得分明显高于测试前的数值:同龄人群体的教育提高了患者对两次透析间隔期间液体消耗的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
46 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Professional Development Program in Management of Midwifery Emergencies for Midwifery Graduates. A Systematic Review of Determinants Influencing Family Planning and Contraceptive Use. Beliefs, Knowledge, and Perception of Indonesian Mental Healthcare Workers Regarding Mental Illness: A Cross-Sectional Study. Demographic Differences in Insomnia and Anxiety and the Association with Cardiovascular Risk Factors among Jordanian Healthy Adult. Detecting Age Prone to Growth Retardation in Children Through a Bi-Response Nonparametric Regression Model with a Penalized Spline Estimator.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1