Identifying what educators need to support trauma-informed practices in the schools: A community needs assessment.

School psychology (Washington, D.C.) Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-08 DOI:10.1037/spq0000621
Karina M Aragón, Alice C Mullin, Erika D Felix, Olivia Appel, Jill D Sharkey
{"title":"Identifying what educators need to support trauma-informed practices in the schools: A community needs assessment.","authors":"Karina M Aragón, Alice C Mullin, Erika D Felix, Olivia Appel, Jill D Sharkey","doi":"10.1037/spq0000621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Educators are often on the frontline of supporting the well-being of their students. Thus, it is critical to ask teachers what they need in regard to implementing trauma-informed practices in schools (TIPS). This mixed-methods, community-initiated needs assessment explored educators' well-being and use of trauma-informed resources. A random selection of 450 certificated school staff from two school districts was invited to participate. Educators (<i>n</i> = 178; 39.5% response rate) completed a survey, and four focus groups were conducted (<i>n</i> = 14) to obtain feedback on factors affecting the use of TIPS. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses were used to determine the factors most related to resource use. Teachers reported strong well-being and low levels of secondary traumatic stress, but high levels of burnout. Themes from the focus groups highlight administrator actions that can improve teacher well-being. Teachers rated their most used resources as a list of mental health resources, virtual-guided wellness activities, and opportunities to connect with others, whereas the most helpful were opportunities to connect with others, in-person-guided wellness activities, and training to identify students who may need support. Teacher well-being and school climate achieved traditional significance values for predicting teacher use of resources; however, they did not reach the Bonferroni-adjusted significance value. Results from this needs assessment indicate that teachers wanted resources to adequately respond to their own and their students' mental well-being. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74763,"journal":{"name":"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)","volume":" ","pages":"520-529"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Educators are often on the frontline of supporting the well-being of their students. Thus, it is critical to ask teachers what they need in regard to implementing trauma-informed practices in schools (TIPS). This mixed-methods, community-initiated needs assessment explored educators' well-being and use of trauma-informed resources. A random selection of 450 certificated school staff from two school districts was invited to participate. Educators (n = 178; 39.5% response rate) completed a survey, and four focus groups were conducted (n = 14) to obtain feedback on factors affecting the use of TIPS. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses were used to determine the factors most related to resource use. Teachers reported strong well-being and low levels of secondary traumatic stress, but high levels of burnout. Themes from the focus groups highlight administrator actions that can improve teacher well-being. Teachers rated their most used resources as a list of mental health resources, virtual-guided wellness activities, and opportunities to connect with others, whereas the most helpful were opportunities to connect with others, in-person-guided wellness activities, and training to identify students who may need support. Teacher well-being and school climate achieved traditional significance values for predicting teacher use of resources; however, they did not reach the Bonferroni-adjusted significance value. Results from this needs assessment indicate that teachers wanted resources to adequately respond to their own and their students' mental well-being. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定教育工作者需要什么来支持学校的创伤知情实践:社区需求评估。
教育工作者往往站在第一线,为学生的福祉提供支持。因此,询问教师在学校实施创伤知情实践(TIPS)方面的需求至关重要。这项由社区发起的混合方法需求评估探讨了教育工作者的福祉和对创伤知情资源的使用情况。我们从两个学区随机抽取了 450 名持有证书的学校教职员工受邀参加。教育工作者(n = 178;回复率 39.5%)填写了一份调查问卷,并开展了四个焦点小组(n = 14),以获得关于影响使用 TIPS 的因素的反馈。通过描述性统计和逻辑回归分析,确定了与资源使用最相关的因素。教师们表示,他们的幸福感很强,继发性创伤压力较低,但职业倦怠程度较高。焦点小组讨论的主题突出了可以提高教师幸福感的管理者行动。教师认为他们最常用的资源是心理健康资源清单、虚拟指导的健康活动以及与他人交流的机会,而最有帮助的资源是与他人交流的机会、面对面指导的健康活动以及识别可能需要支持的学生的培训。教师幸福感和学校氛围在预测教师使用资源方面达到了传统的显著值;但是,它们没有达到 Bonferroni-adjusted 的显著值。此次需求评估的结果表明,教师希望获得资源,以充分应对自己和学生的心理健康问题。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Randomization in single-case design experiments: Addressing threats to internal validity. Using mixed methods to improve understanding and advancement of mixed methods research in school psychology. Poisson regression is the best method to analyze cumulative adverse childhood experiences. Youth mental health first aid for educators of immigrant-origin youth: A mixed-method evaluation of the virtual delivery approach. Academic screening in middle school: Exploring bivariate and intraindividual relations in reading and math performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1