Algorithm vs. clinical experience: controlled ovarian stimulations with follitropin-delta and individualised doses of follitropin-alpha/beta.

IF 2.8 Q2 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY Reproduction & fertility Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1530/RAF-23-0045
Irene Gazzo, Francesca Bovis, Denise Colia, Fausta Sozzi, Mauro Costa, Paola Anserini, Claudia Massarotti
{"title":"Algorithm vs. clinical experience: controlled ovarian stimulations with follitropin-delta and individualised doses of follitropin-alpha/beta.","authors":"Irene Gazzo, Francesca Bovis, Denise Colia, Fausta Sozzi, Mauro Costa, Paola Anserini, Claudia Massarotti","doi":"10.1530/RAF-23-0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the registrational trials, follitropin delta was compared with a fixed dose of 150 UI of follitropin alpha/beta, finding higher chances to reach a target response of 8-14 oocytes compared to controls. For this reason, follitropin delta is marketed as particularly useful in expected hyper-responder patients. The main outcome of this study is to report if comparable results are reached in a real-life scenario with follitropin alpha/beta personalized doses, based on patients' characteristics. This is a retrospective study performed in two public fertility centres. All first cycles from January 2020 to June 2022 with either follitropin delta (cases) or alpha/beta (controls) in patients with antiMüllerian hormone >2.5 ng/ml were compared by an inverse probability weighting approach based on propensity score. The follitropin total dose was higher in controls (1179.06 ± 344.93 vs. 1668.67 ± 555.22 IU, p<0.001). The target response of 8-14 oocytes was reached by 40.2% of cases and 40.7% of controls (odds ratio (OR) 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-1.53, p=0.98). Fewer than 8 oocytes were collected in 24.1% of cases and 22% of controls (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.71-1.69, p=0.67); more than 14 oocytes in 35.7% of cases and 37.3% of controls (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.54-1.28, p=0.40). Our experience did not find worse results in term of proportion of patients who reached the target response with an algorithm-chosen dose of follitropin delta compared to a personalised starting dose of follitropin alpha/beta, with follitropin delta having the advantage of objectivity. Larger numbers are needed to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":101312,"journal":{"name":"Reproduction & fertility","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10959055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproduction & fertility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/RAF-23-0045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the registrational trials, follitropin delta was compared with a fixed dose of 150 UI of follitropin alpha/beta, finding higher chances to reach a target response of 8-14 oocytes compared to controls. For this reason, follitropin delta is marketed as particularly useful in expected hyper-responder patients. The main outcome of this study is to report if comparable results are reached in a real-life scenario with follitropin alpha/beta personalized doses, based on patients' characteristics. This is a retrospective study performed in two public fertility centres. All first cycles from January 2020 to June 2022 with either follitropin delta (cases) or alpha/beta (controls) in patients with antiMüllerian hormone >2.5 ng/ml were compared by an inverse probability weighting approach based on propensity score. The follitropin total dose was higher in controls (1179.06 ± 344.93 vs. 1668.67 ± 555.22 IU, p<0.001). The target response of 8-14 oocytes was reached by 40.2% of cases and 40.7% of controls (odds ratio (OR) 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-1.53, p=0.98). Fewer than 8 oocytes were collected in 24.1% of cases and 22% of controls (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.71-1.69, p=0.67); more than 14 oocytes in 35.7% of cases and 37.3% of controls (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.54-1.28, p=0.40). Our experience did not find worse results in term of proportion of patients who reached the target response with an algorithm-chosen dose of follitropin delta compared to a personalised starting dose of follitropin alpha/beta, with follitropin delta having the advantage of objectivity. Larger numbers are needed to confirm these results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
算法与临床经验:使用雌二醇促性腺激素和个体化剂量的促性腺激素α/β进行控制性卵巢刺激。
在注册试验中,δ型促卵泡激素与固定剂量为 150 UI 的α/β型促卵泡激素进行了比较,结果发现,与对照组相比,δ型促卵泡激素达到 8-14 卵母细胞目标反应的几率更高。因此,在市场上,follitropin delta 特别适用于预期高反应患者。本研究的主要目的是根据患者的特点,报告在现实生活中使用促性腺激素α/β个性化剂量是否能达到类似的效果。这是一项在两家公立生殖中心进行的回顾性研究。研究采用基于倾向评分的反概率加权法,对抗穆勒氏管激素大于2.5纳克/毫升的患者在2020年1月至2022年6月期间使用促卵泡素δ(病例)或α/β(对照组)的所有第一个周期进行了比较。对照组的促甲状腺激素总剂量更高(1179.06 ± 344.93 vs. 1668.67 ± 555.22 IU,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oral dydrogesterone versus oral micronized progesterone in threatened miscarriage: protocol paper for a randomized controlled trial. Impact of paternal high energy diets on semen quality and embryo development in cattle. Dyspareunia is rarely assessed in rodent models of endometriosis and interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. Comparing surface immune markers in successful and non-viable ART pregnancies on the day of hCG measurement: a prospective pilot study. Age and serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels as predictors of time to return of menses after chemotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1