Preconception health risk factors documented in general practice electronic medical records.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI:10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202038
Nishadi Nethmini Withanage, Jessica R Botfield, Kirsten Black, Danielle Mazza
{"title":"Preconception health risk factors documented in general practice electronic medical records.","authors":"Nishadi Nethmini Withanage, Jessica R Botfield, Kirsten Black, Danielle Mazza","doi":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Documenting medical and lifestyle preconception health risk factors in electronic medical records (EMRs) could assist general practitioners (GPs) to identify those reproductive-aged women who could most benefit from preconception care (PCC). However, it is unclear to what extent PCC risk factors are identifiable in general practice records. This study aimed to determine the extent to which medical and lifestyle preconception health risk factors are documented in general practice EMRs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an audit of the documentation of medical and lifestyle preconception risk factors in 10 general practice EMRs in Melbourne, Australia. We retrospectively analysed the EMRs of 100 consecutive women aged 18-44 years who visited each practice between January and September 2022. Using a template informed by PCC guidelines, we extracted data from structured fields in the EMR and conducted a descriptive analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the data extracted, the more commonly documented medical and lifestyle preconception health risk factors in the EMRs included smoking (79%), blood pressure (74%), alcohol consumption (63%) and body mass index (57%). Among the women audited, 14% were smokers, 24% were obese, 7% had high blood pressure, 5% had diabetes, 28% had a mental health condition, 13% had asthma, 6% had thyroid disease and 17% had been prescribed and could be using a potentially teratogenic medication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Better documentation of medical and lifestyle preconception health risk factors in structured fields in EMRs may potentially assist primary care providers including GPs in identifying and providing PCC to women who could most benefit from it.</p>","PeriodicalId":9219,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11287648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Documenting medical and lifestyle preconception health risk factors in electronic medical records (EMRs) could assist general practitioners (GPs) to identify those reproductive-aged women who could most benefit from preconception care (PCC). However, it is unclear to what extent PCC risk factors are identifiable in general practice records. This study aimed to determine the extent to which medical and lifestyle preconception health risk factors are documented in general practice EMRs.

Methods: We conducted an audit of the documentation of medical and lifestyle preconception risk factors in 10 general practice EMRs in Melbourne, Australia. We retrospectively analysed the EMRs of 100 consecutive women aged 18-44 years who visited each practice between January and September 2022. Using a template informed by PCC guidelines, we extracted data from structured fields in the EMR and conducted a descriptive analysis.

Results: Among the data extracted, the more commonly documented medical and lifestyle preconception health risk factors in the EMRs included smoking (79%), blood pressure (74%), alcohol consumption (63%) and body mass index (57%). Among the women audited, 14% were smokers, 24% were obese, 7% had high blood pressure, 5% had diabetes, 28% had a mental health condition, 13% had asthma, 6% had thyroid disease and 17% had been prescribed and could be using a potentially teratogenic medication.

Conclusions: Better documentation of medical and lifestyle preconception health risk factors in structured fields in EMRs may potentially assist primary care providers including GPs in identifying and providing PCC to women who could most benefit from it.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全科电子病历中记录的孕前健康风险因素。
背景:在电子病历(EMR)中记录医疗和生活方式方面的孕前健康风险因素,可帮助全科医生(GPs)识别哪些育龄妇女最有可能从孕前保健(PCC)中获益。然而,目前尚不清楚全科医生记录中的孕前保健风险因素在多大程度上可以被识别。本研究旨在确定医疗和生活方式方面的孕前健康风险因素在全科医学电子病历中的记录程度:我们对澳大利亚墨尔本 10 家全科医疗机构的电子病历中记录的医疗和生活方式方面的孕前风险因素进行了审计。我们回顾性地分析了 2022 年 1 月至 9 月期间连续就诊的 100 名 18-44 岁女性的电子病历。我们使用 PCC 指南提供的模板,从 EMR 的结构化字段中提取数据,并进行了描述性分析:在提取的数据中,EMR 中记录较多的医疗和生活方式方面的孕前健康风险因素包括吸烟(79%)、血压(74%)、饮酒(63%)和体重指数(57%)。在接受审计的妇女中,14%的人吸烟,24%的人肥胖,7%的人患有高血压,5%的人患有糖尿病,28%的人患有精神疾病,13%的人患有哮喘,6%的人患有甲状腺疾病,17%的人曾被处方并可能正在使用潜在的致畸药物:在电子病历的结构化字段中更好地记录医疗和生活方式方面的孕前健康风险因素,可能有助于包括全科医生在内的初级保健提供者识别并向最有可能从中受益的妇女提供孕前保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health Medicine-Reproductive Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health is a multiprofessional journal that promotes sexual and reproductive health and wellbeing, and best contraceptive practice, worldwide. It publishes research, debate and comment to inform policy and practice, and recognises the importance of professional-patient partnership.
期刊最新文献
Abortion patients' perspectives on enhancing a telemedicine model of post-abortion contraception: a qualitative study. COVID-19 pandemic exacerbation of disparities in access to public abortion services in Mexico. Local anaesthesia for pain control in surgical abortion before 14 weeks of pregnancy: a systematic review. Management of breast engorgement after second-trimester abortion or loss: a survey of current practice patterns. Acceptability of home-based medical abortion among Hong Kong women undergoing an abortion: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1