Investigating pedigree- and SNP-associated components of heritability in a wild population of Soay sheep

IF 3.1 2区 生物学 Q2 ECOLOGY Heredity Pub Date : 2024-02-10 DOI:10.1038/s41437-024-00673-6
Caelinn James, Josephine M. Pemberton, Pau Navarro, Sara Knott
{"title":"Investigating pedigree- and SNP-associated components of heritability in a wild population of Soay sheep","authors":"Caelinn James, Josephine M. Pemberton, Pau Navarro, Sara Knott","doi":"10.1038/s41437-024-00673-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Estimates of narrow sense heritability derived from genomic data that contain related individuals may be biased due to the within-family effects such as dominance, epistasis and common environmental factors. However, for many wild populations, removal of related individuals from the data would result in small sample sizes. In 2013, Zaitlen et al. proposed a method to estimate heritability in populations that include close relatives by simultaneously fitting an identity-by-state (IBS) genomic relatedness matrix (GRM) and an identity-by-descent (IBD) GRM. The IBD GRM is identical to the IBS GRM, except relatedness estimates below a specified threshold are set to 0. We applied this method to a sample of 8557 wild Soay sheep from St. Kilda, with genotypic information for 419,281 single nucleotide polymorphisms. We aimed to see how this method would partition heritability into population-level (IBS) and family-associated (IBD) variance for a range of genetic architectures, and so we focused on a mixture of polygenic and monogenic traits. We also implemented a variant of the model in which the IBD GRM was replaced by a GRM constructed from SNPs with low minor allele frequency to examine whether any additive genetic variance is captured by rare alleles. Whilst the inclusion of the IBD GRM did not significantly improve the fit of the model for the monogenic traits, it improved the fit for some of the polygenic traits, suggesting that dominance, epistasis and/or common environment not already captured by the non-genetic random effects fitted in our models may influence these traits.","PeriodicalId":12991,"journal":{"name":"Heredity","volume":"132 4","pages":"202-210"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41437-024-00673-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heredity","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41437-024-00673-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Estimates of narrow sense heritability derived from genomic data that contain related individuals may be biased due to the within-family effects such as dominance, epistasis and common environmental factors. However, for many wild populations, removal of related individuals from the data would result in small sample sizes. In 2013, Zaitlen et al. proposed a method to estimate heritability in populations that include close relatives by simultaneously fitting an identity-by-state (IBS) genomic relatedness matrix (GRM) and an identity-by-descent (IBD) GRM. The IBD GRM is identical to the IBS GRM, except relatedness estimates below a specified threshold are set to 0. We applied this method to a sample of 8557 wild Soay sheep from St. Kilda, with genotypic information for 419,281 single nucleotide polymorphisms. We aimed to see how this method would partition heritability into population-level (IBS) and family-associated (IBD) variance for a range of genetic architectures, and so we focused on a mixture of polygenic and monogenic traits. We also implemented a variant of the model in which the IBD GRM was replaced by a GRM constructed from SNPs with low minor allele frequency to examine whether any additive genetic variance is captured by rare alleles. Whilst the inclusion of the IBD GRM did not significantly improve the fit of the model for the monogenic traits, it improved the fit for some of the polygenic traits, suggesting that dominance, epistasis and/or common environment not already captured by the non-genetic random effects fitted in our models may influence these traits.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查索伊羊野生种群遗传率中与血统和 SNP 相关的成分。
从包含亲缘个体的基因组数据中得出的狭义遗传率估计值,可能会因显性、外显和共同环境因素等族内效应而产生偏差。然而,对于许多野生种群来说,从数据中剔除亲缘个体会导致样本量较小。2013 年,Zaitlen 等人提出了一种方法,通过同时拟合按状态(IBS)的基因组亲缘关系矩阵(GRM)和按世系(IBD)的基因组亲缘关系矩阵(GRM)来估计包括近亲在内的种群的遗传率。IBD GRM 与 IBS GRM 相同,只是低于特定阈值的亲缘关系估计值被设为 0。我们将这种方法应用于来自圣基尔达的 8557 只野生索伊羊样本,其中包含 419,281 个单核苷酸多态性的基因型信息。我们的目标是了解这种方法如何将遗传率划分为一系列遗传结构的群体水平(IBS)和家族相关(IBD)方差,因此我们重点研究了多基因和单基因性状的混合。我们还对模型进行了变异,用小等位基因频率较低的 SNPs 构建的 GRM 取代了 IBD GRM,以检验稀有等位基因是否捕获了任何附加遗传变异。虽然加入 IBD GRM 并没有显著改善单基因性状模型的拟合度,但却改善了一些多基因性状的拟合度,这表明我们模型中拟合的非遗传随机效应尚未捕捉到的显性、外显和/或共同环境可能会影响这些性状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heredity
Heredity 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
84
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Heredity is the official journal of the Genetics Society. It covers a broad range of topics within the field of genetics and therefore papers must address conceptual or applied issues of interest to the journal''s wide readership
期刊最新文献
Kinship clustering within an ecologically diverse killer whale metapopulation. Incorporating spatial and genetic competition into breeding pipelines with the R package gencomp. The evolution of preferred male traits, female preference and the G matrix: "Toto, I've a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore". Maternal effects in the model system Daphnia: the ecological past meets the epigenetic future. Infection pattern of male-killing viruses alters phenotypes in the tea tortrix moth Homona magnanima.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1