Arthroscopic surgery for scaphoid nonunion: a 10-year systematic literature review.

Q1 Medicine MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-10 DOI:10.1007/s12306-023-00805-x
Alberto Rinaldi, Federico Pilla, Ilaria Chiaramonte, Davide Pederiva, Fabio Vita, Francesco Schilardi, Andrea Gennaro, Cesare Faldini
{"title":"Arthroscopic surgery for scaphoid nonunion: a 10-year systematic literature review.","authors":"Alberto Rinaldi, Federico Pilla, Ilaria Chiaramonte, Davide Pederiva, Fabio Vita, Francesco Schilardi, Andrea Gennaro, Cesare Faldini","doi":"10.1007/s12306-023-00805-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of the study was to investigate whether arthroscopic treatment of carpal scaphoid nonunions by osteosynthesis with bone grafting represents a successful surgical technique. This systematic literature review, conducted following the PRISMA guidelines, explores the past 10 years of clinical studies concerning the arthroscopic treatment of scaphoid nonunions. The most relevant keywords were used to search the databases, and the Downs and Black 27-item checklist has been used as quality assessment tool. Twelve papers that meet the premised eligibility criteria have been identified. These studies demonstrate the efficacy of this surgical solution, achieving a postoperative union rate of 96% in the average time of 13.5 weeks. Regardless of the method of synthesis and the origin of the graft used, excellent results were obtained. Patients who underwent this procedure reported a pain reduction of almost 80% compared to the preoperative level, improvement in grip strength close to 40%, and recovery in wrist function during daily activities. Arthroscopy has numerous advantages compared to the open approach. These are technically recognized by the surgeon and by the patient. Some disadvantages include a longer intraoperative time and considerable significant technical difficulty. Arthroscopic treatment of scaphoid nonunion by osteosynthesis with bone graft achieves a 96% union rate of the treated scaphoid with satisfying clinical results.</p>","PeriodicalId":18875,"journal":{"name":"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY","volume":" ","pages":"125-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11133090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-023-00805-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate whether arthroscopic treatment of carpal scaphoid nonunions by osteosynthesis with bone grafting represents a successful surgical technique. This systematic literature review, conducted following the PRISMA guidelines, explores the past 10 years of clinical studies concerning the arthroscopic treatment of scaphoid nonunions. The most relevant keywords were used to search the databases, and the Downs and Black 27-item checklist has been used as quality assessment tool. Twelve papers that meet the premised eligibility criteria have been identified. These studies demonstrate the efficacy of this surgical solution, achieving a postoperative union rate of 96% in the average time of 13.5 weeks. Regardless of the method of synthesis and the origin of the graft used, excellent results were obtained. Patients who underwent this procedure reported a pain reduction of almost 80% compared to the preoperative level, improvement in grip strength close to 40%, and recovery in wrist function during daily activities. Arthroscopy has numerous advantages compared to the open approach. These are technically recognized by the surgeon and by the patient. Some disadvantages include a longer intraoperative time and considerable significant technical difficulty. Arthroscopic treatment of scaphoid nonunion by osteosynthesis with bone graft achieves a 96% union rate of the treated scaphoid with satisfying clinical results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关节镜手术治疗肩胛骨骨不连:10 年系统文献综述。
本研究的目的是探讨在关节镜下通过骨合成和植骨术治疗腕骨肩胛骨骨不连是否是一种成功的手术技术。本系统性文献综述遵循 PRISMA 指南,探讨了过去 10 年中有关关节镜治疗肩胛骨骨不连的临床研究。我们使用了最相关的关键词来搜索数据库,并将唐斯和布莱克的 27 项检查表作为质量评估工具。最终确定了 12 篇符合前提资格标准的论文。这些研究证明了这一手术方案的有效性,在平均 13.5 周的时间内,术后结合率达到 96%。无论使用哪种合成方法和移植物来源,都取得了极佳的效果。与术前相比,接受该手术的患者疼痛减轻了近80%,握力提高了近40%,日常活动中的腕关节功能也得到了恢复。与开放式方法相比,关节镜手术有许多优点。外科医生和患者都能从技术上认识到这些优势。缺点是术中时间较长,技术难度较大。在关节镜下通过植骨进行骨合成治疗肩胛骨未愈合,治疗后肩胛骨的愈合率达到 96%,临床效果令人满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Surgery – Formerly La Chirurgia degli Organi di Movimento, founded in 1917 at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, is a peer-reviewed journal published three times a year. The journal provides up-to-date information to clinicians and scientists through the publication of original papers, reviews, case reports, and brief communications dealing with the pathogenesis and treatment of orthopaedic conditions.An electronic version is also available at http://www.springerlink.com.The journal is open for publication of supplements and for publishing abstracts of scientific meetings; conditions can be obtained from the Editors-in-Chief or the Publisher.
期刊最新文献
Identification of potential genes associated with metastasis in osteosarcoma: an integrated bioinformatics analysis. Outcome of total knee arthroplasty in patients with Blount disease or Blount-like deformity: a systematic review. Returning to running after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and a novel multimodal protocol. Outcome of hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty conversion: a systematic review. Artificial intelligence in orthopedic research assistance: a resident's perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1