Application of NEMA protocols to verify GATE models based on the Digital Biograph Vision and the Biograph Vision Quadra scanners.

Miriam Magela Peña-Acosta, Sergio Gallardo, María Lorduy-Alós, Gumersindo Verdú
{"title":"Application of NEMA protocols to verify GATE models based on the Digital Biograph Vision and the Biograph Vision Quadra scanners.","authors":"Miriam Magela Peña-Acosta, Sergio Gallardo, María Lorduy-Alós, Gumersindo Verdú","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2024.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Monte Carlo method is an effective tool to simulate and verify PET systems. Furthermore, it can help in the design and optimization of new medical imaging devices and algorithms. In this framework, the goal of this work is to verify the GATE toolkit performance when applied to simulate two Siemens Healthineers PET scanners: a standard axial field-of-view Biograph Vision scanner and the new long axial field-of-view Biograph Vision Quadra scanner.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The simulation toolkit GATE is based on GEANT4, comprising its main functionalities and a set of domain-specific features in the field of medical physics. To accomplish our purpose, the guidelines described in the NEMA NU 2-2018 protocol are reproduced. Then the simulated results are compared to experimental data available in the literature for both PET scanners. The assessment of the models includes different studies of sensitivity, count rate performances, spatial resolution and image quality. These tests are intended to evaluate the image quality of PET devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the spatial resolution test, relative errors lower than 8% are obtained between the experiments and GATE models. The sensitivity is 17.2 cps/kBq (Vision) and 175.9 cps/kBq (Quadra), representing relative differences with the experiment of 6% and 0.3%, respectively. Deviations from peak NECR are less than 9%. In the Image Quality test, the contrast recovery coefficient for hot spheres, with 8 iterations and 5 subsets, ranges between 57-83% for Vision and 54-86% for Quadra. These values represent a maximum deviation between the simulations and the experiments of 10% for the Quadra scanner. In the case of the Vision scanner, the highest difference is observed for the 10 mm sphere (∼38%) due to the higher contrast recovery of the experiment caused by the Gibbs artifact from the use of PSF reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the simulations have provided evidence of a good agreement between the experimental data and the results obtained with GATE. Thus, this work supports the capability of this MC toolkit to accurately simulate the models of the Vision and Quadra scanners. This study has laid the basis for further research in this field and has identified several areas that could be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":101315,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2024.01.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The Monte Carlo method is an effective tool to simulate and verify PET systems. Furthermore, it can help in the design and optimization of new medical imaging devices and algorithms. In this framework, the goal of this work is to verify the GATE toolkit performance when applied to simulate two Siemens Healthineers PET scanners: a standard axial field-of-view Biograph Vision scanner and the new long axial field-of-view Biograph Vision Quadra scanner.

Methods: The simulation toolkit GATE is based on GEANT4, comprising its main functionalities and a set of domain-specific features in the field of medical physics. To accomplish our purpose, the guidelines described in the NEMA NU 2-2018 protocol are reproduced. Then the simulated results are compared to experimental data available in the literature for both PET scanners. The assessment of the models includes different studies of sensitivity, count rate performances, spatial resolution and image quality. These tests are intended to evaluate the image quality of PET devices.

Results: In the spatial resolution test, relative errors lower than 8% are obtained between the experiments and GATE models. The sensitivity is 17.2 cps/kBq (Vision) and 175.9 cps/kBq (Quadra), representing relative differences with the experiment of 6% and 0.3%, respectively. Deviations from peak NECR are less than 9%. In the Image Quality test, the contrast recovery coefficient for hot spheres, with 8 iterations and 5 subsets, ranges between 57-83% for Vision and 54-86% for Quadra. These values represent a maximum deviation between the simulations and the experiments of 10% for the Quadra scanner. In the case of the Vision scanner, the highest difference is observed for the 10 mm sphere (∼38%) due to the higher contrast recovery of the experiment caused by the Gibbs artifact from the use of PSF reconstruction.

Conclusions: The results of the simulations have provided evidence of a good agreement between the experimental data and the results obtained with GATE. Thus, this work supports the capability of this MC toolkit to accurately simulate the models of the Vision and Quadra scanners. This study has laid the basis for further research in this field and has identified several areas that could be explored.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用 NEMA 协议验证基于 Digital Biograph Vision 和 Biograph Vision Quadra 扫描仪的 GATE 模型。
目的:蒙特卡罗方法是模拟和验证 PET 系统的有效工具。此外,它还有助于设计和优化新的医疗成像设备和算法。在此框架下,这项工作的目标是验证 GATE 工具包在模拟两台西门子医疗 PET 扫描仪时的性能:标准轴向视场 Biograph Vision 扫描仪和新型长轴向视场 Biograph Vision Quadra 扫描仪:模拟工具包 GATE 基于 GEANT4,包括其主要功能和一系列医学物理领域的特定功能。为了达到我们的目的,我们复制了 NEMA NU 2-2018 协议中描述的指南。然后将模拟结果与文献中关于这两种 PET 扫描仪的实验数据进行比较。对模型的评估包括对灵敏度、计数率性能、空间分辨率和图像质量的不同研究。这些测试旨在评估 PET 设备的图像质量:在空间分辨率测试中,实验与 GATE 模型之间的相对误差低于 8%。灵敏度为 17.2 cps/kBq(Vision)和 175.9 cps/kBq(Quadra),与实验的相对误差分别为 6% 和 0.3%。与 NECR 峰值的偏差小于 9%。在图像质量测试中,热球的对比度恢复系数在 8 次迭代和 5 个子集之间,Vision 为 57-83%,Quadra 为 54-86%。就 Quadra 扫描仪而言,这些数值代表模拟与实验之间的最大偏差为 10%。在 Vision 扫描仪中,10 毫米球体的差异最大(38%),原因是使用 PSF 重建时产生的 Gibbs 伪影导致实验对比度恢复较高:模拟结果证明,实验数据与使用 GATE 得出的结果非常吻合。因此,这项工作支持 MC 工具包准确模拟 Vision 和 Quadra 扫描仪模型的能力。这项研究为这一领域的进一步研究奠定了基础,并确定了几个可以探索的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of an MR-only radiotherapy treatment planning workflow using a commercial synthetic CT generator for brain and head & neck tumor patients. Impact of the corneal epithelium on the corneal power using 3D raytracing with OCT data. A noise-robust post-processing pipeline for accelerated phase-cycled 23Na Multi-Quantum Coherences MRI. Imaging dose and image quality of kilovoltage imaging implemented on a helical tomotherapy unit. Ultra-high-resolution brain MRI at 0.55T: bSTAR and its application to magnetization transfer ratio imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1