Availability and Quality of Dialysis Care in Rural versus Urban US Counties.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY American Journal of Nephrology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-11 DOI:10.1159/000537763
Elizabeth Crouch, Nick Yell, Laura Herbert, Teri Browne, Peiyin Hung
{"title":"Availability and Quality of Dialysis Care in Rural versus Urban US Counties.","authors":"Elizabeth Crouch, Nick Yell, Laura Herbert, Teri Browne, Peiyin Hung","doi":"10.1159/000537763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rural areas face significant disparities in dialysis care compared to urban areas due to limited access to dialysis facilities, longer travel distances, and a shortage of healthcare professionals. The objective of this study was to conduct a national examination of rural-urban differences in quality of dialysis care offered across counties in the USA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were gathered from Medicare-certified dialysis facilities in 2020 from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services website. To identify high-need counties, county-level estimated crude prevalence of diabetes in adults was obtained from the 2022 CDC PLACES data portal. Our analysis reviewed 3,141 counties in the USA. The primary outcome measured was whether the county had a dialysis facility. Among those counties that had a dialysis facility, additional outcomes were the average star rating, whether peritoneal dialysis was offered, and whether home dialysis was offered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The type of services offered by dialysis facilities varied significantly, with peritoneal dialysis being the most commonly offered service (50.8%), followed by home hemodialysis (28.5%) and late-shift services (16.0%). These service availabilities are more prevalent in urban facilities than in rural facilities. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Five Star Quality ratings were quite different between urban and rural facilities, with 40.4% of rural facilities having a ranking of five, compared to 27.1% in urban.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of rural counties lack a single dialysis facility. Counties with high rates of chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and blood pressure, deemed high need, were less likely to have a highly rated dialysis facility. The findings can be used to further inform targeted efforts to increase diabetes educational programming and design appropriate interventions to those residing in rural communities and high-need counties who may need it the most.</p>","PeriodicalId":7570,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nephrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000537763","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Rural areas face significant disparities in dialysis care compared to urban areas due to limited access to dialysis facilities, longer travel distances, and a shortage of healthcare professionals. The objective of this study was to conduct a national examination of rural-urban differences in quality of dialysis care offered across counties in the USA.

Methods: Data were gathered from Medicare-certified dialysis facilities in 2020 from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services website. To identify high-need counties, county-level estimated crude prevalence of diabetes in adults was obtained from the 2022 CDC PLACES data portal. Our analysis reviewed 3,141 counties in the USA. The primary outcome measured was whether the county had a dialysis facility. Among those counties that had a dialysis facility, additional outcomes were the average star rating, whether peritoneal dialysis was offered, and whether home dialysis was offered.

Results: The type of services offered by dialysis facilities varied significantly, with peritoneal dialysis being the most commonly offered service (50.8%), followed by home hemodialysis (28.5%) and late-shift services (16.0%). These service availabilities are more prevalent in urban facilities than in rural facilities. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Five Star Quality ratings were quite different between urban and rural facilities, with 40.4% of rural facilities having a ranking of five, compared to 27.1% in urban.

Conclusion: The majority of rural counties lack a single dialysis facility. Counties with high rates of chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and blood pressure, deemed high need, were less likely to have a highly rated dialysis facility. The findings can be used to further inform targeted efforts to increase diabetes educational programming and design appropriate interventions to those residing in rural communities and high-need counties who may need it the most.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国农村地区与城市地区透析护理的可用性和质量。
导言:与城市地区相比,农村地区由于透析设施有限、路途遥远以及医疗保健专业人员短缺等原因,在透析治疗方面面临着巨大的差距。本研究旨在对美国各县透析医疗质量的城乡差异进行全国性调查:从联邦医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心网站上收集 2020 年联邦医疗保险认证透析机构的数据。为了确定高需求县,我们从 2022 年美国疾病预防控制中心 PLACES 数据门户网站上获取了县级成人糖尿病估计粗患病率。我们的分析回顾了美国的 3141 个县,衡量的主要结果是该县是否拥有透析设施。在拥有透析设施的县中,其他结果包括平均星级、是否提供腹膜透析以及是否提供家庭透析:透析机构提供的服务类型差异很大,最常提供的服务是腹膜透析(50.8%),其次是家庭血液透析(28.5%)和晚班服务(16.0%)。与农村医疗机构相比,城市医疗机构提供这些服务的情况更为普遍。医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心的五星级质量评级在城市和农村医疗机构之间存在很大差异,40.4%的农村医疗机构的评级为五级,而城市医疗机构的评级为 27.1%:结论:大多数农村地区没有一家透析机构。慢性肾病、糖尿病和高血压发病率较高且需求量较大的县,拥有高评级透析机构的可能性较小。研究结果可用于进一步有针对性地增加糖尿病教育计划,并为居住在农村社区和高需求县的最需要者设计适当的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Nephrology
American Journal of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
74
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The ''American Journal of Nephrology'' is a peer-reviewed journal that focuses on timely topics in both basic science and clinical research. Papers are divided into several sections, including:
期刊最新文献
Off-label Use of Mycophenolate Mofetil in Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Urinary sodium excretion and kidney disease progression in IgA nephropathy: A cohort study. A risk prediction model for new-onset chronic kidney disease in the elderly. Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Upacicalcet in Japanese Hemodialysis Patients with Secondary Hyperparathyroidism: Open-label 52-week Study. Association between timing of vascular access creation and mortality in patients initiating hemodialysis: A nationwide cohort study in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1