Substantive fairness in the GDPR: Fairness Elements for Article 5.1a GDPR

IF 3.3 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Computer Law & Security Review Pub Date : 2024-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.clsr.2024.105942
Andreas Häuselmann, Bart Custers
{"title":"Substantive fairness in the GDPR: Fairness Elements for Article 5.1a GDPR","authors":"Andreas Häuselmann,&nbsp;Bart Custers","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2024.105942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>According to the fairness principle in Article 5.1a of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), data controllers must process personal data fairly. However, the GDPR fails to explain what is fairness and how it should be achieved. In fact, the GDPR focuses mostly on procedural fairness: if personal data are processed in compliance with the GDPR, for instance, by ensuring lawfulness and transparency, such processing is assumed to be fair. Because some forms of data processing can still be unfair, even if all the GDPR's procedural rules are complied with, we argue that substantive fairness is also an essential part of the GDPR's fairness principle and necessary to achieve the GDPR's goal of offering effective protection to data subjects. Substantive fairness is not mentioned in the GDPR and no guidance on substantive fairness is provided. In this paper, we provide elements of substantive fairness derived from EU consumer law, competition law, non-discrimination law, and data protection law that can help interpret the substantive part of the GDPR's fairness principle. Three elements derived from consumer protection law are good faith, no detrimental effects, and autonomy (e.g., no misleading or aggressive practices). We derive the element of abuse of dominant position (and power inequalities) from competition law. From other areas of law, we derive non-discrimination, vulnerabilities, and accuracy as elements relevant to interpreting substantive fairness. Although this may not be a complete list, cumulatively these elements may help interpret Article 5.1a GDPR and help achieve fairness in data protection law.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51516,"journal":{"name":"Computer Law & Security Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364924000098/pdfft?md5=9b2b92d2ee98f14fb7799d00af51f207&pid=1-s2.0-S0267364924000098-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Law & Security Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364924000098","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to the fairness principle in Article 5.1a of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), data controllers must process personal data fairly. However, the GDPR fails to explain what is fairness and how it should be achieved. In fact, the GDPR focuses mostly on procedural fairness: if personal data are processed in compliance with the GDPR, for instance, by ensuring lawfulness and transparency, such processing is assumed to be fair. Because some forms of data processing can still be unfair, even if all the GDPR's procedural rules are complied with, we argue that substantive fairness is also an essential part of the GDPR's fairness principle and necessary to achieve the GDPR's goal of offering effective protection to data subjects. Substantive fairness is not mentioned in the GDPR and no guidance on substantive fairness is provided. In this paper, we provide elements of substantive fairness derived from EU consumer law, competition law, non-discrimination law, and data protection law that can help interpret the substantive part of the GDPR's fairness principle. Three elements derived from consumer protection law are good faith, no detrimental effects, and autonomy (e.g., no misleading or aggressive practices). We derive the element of abuse of dominant position (and power inequalities) from competition law. From other areas of law, we derive non-discrimination, vulnerabilities, and accuracy as elements relevant to interpreting substantive fairness. Although this may not be a complete list, cumulatively these elements may help interpret Article 5.1a GDPR and help achieve fairness in data protection law.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GDPR 中的实质性公平:GDPR 第 5.1a 条的公平要素
根据欧盟《一般数据保护条例》(GDPR)第 5.1a 条的公平原则,数据控制者必须公平地处理个人数据。然而,GDPR 没有解释什么是公平以及如何实现公平。事实上,GDPR 主要关注的是程序公平性:如果个人数据的处理符合 GDPR 的规定,例如通过确保合法性和透明度,那么这种处理就被认为是公平的。由于某些形式的数据处理仍然可能是不公平的,即使 GDPR 的所有程序规则都得到了遵守,我们认为实质公平也是 GDPR 公平原则的重要组成部分,是实现 GDPR 为数据主体提供有效保护这一目标所必需的。GDPR 中没有提到实质公平,也没有提供关于实质公平的指导。在本文中,我们提供了源自欧盟消费者法、竞争法、非歧视法和数据保护法的实质性公平要素,这些要素有助于解释 GDPR 公平原则的实质性部分。从消费者保护法中引申出的三个要素是诚信、无损害性影响和自主权(如无误导性或侵略性做法)。我们从竞争法中引申出滥用支配地位(和权力不平等)的要素。我们从其他法律领域引申出不歧视、脆弱性和准确性等与解释实质公平性相关的要素。尽管这可能不是一个完整的清单,但这些要素的累积可能有助于解释 GDPR 第 5.1a 条,并有助于实现数据保护法的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: CLSR publishes refereed academic and practitioner papers on topics such as Web 2.0, IT security, Identity management, ID cards, RFID, interference with privacy, Internet law, telecoms regulation, online broadcasting, intellectual property, software law, e-commerce, outsourcing, data protection, EU policy, freedom of information, computer security and many other topics. In addition it provides a regular update on European Union developments, national news from more than 20 jurisdictions in both Europe and the Pacific Rim. It is looking for papers within the subject area that display good quality legal analysis and new lines of legal thought or policy development that go beyond mere description of the subject area, however accurate that may be.
期刊最新文献
Procedural fairness in automated asylum procedures: Fundamental rights for fundamental challenges Asia-Pacific developments An Infrastructural Brussels Effect: The translation of EU Law into the UK's digital borders Mapping interpretations of the law in online content moderation in Germany A European right to end-to-end encryption?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1