Bettina B. Hoeppner , David Eddie , Melissa Schick , Susanne S. Hoeppner , Lourah Kelly , John F. Kelly
{"title":"Feasibility of and reactivity to ecological momentary assessment (EMA) during electronic cigarette use initiation in adults who smoke daily","authors":"Bettina B. Hoeppner , David Eddie , Melissa Schick , Susanne S. Hoeppner , Lourah Kelly , John F. Kelly","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpsy.2023.100247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>This pilot study tested the feasibility of tracking e-cigarette initiation over three months using a burst-of-measurement approach and examined reactivity to the ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data capture technique in this context.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Adults who smoked daily and were interested in trying e-cigarette use received an e-cigarette starter kit and were randomized to complete EMA reports (<em>n</em> = 30) vs. not (<em>n</em> = 29). Participants (<em>M<sub>age</sub></em>=44.1 years [<em>SD</em>=12.6], 61.0 % male, 54.3 % White, 38.9 % Black/African American) smoked 13.0 cigarettes per day on average (<em>SD</em>=8.4) and reported mild-to-moderate nicotine dependence (<em>M<sub>FTND</sub></em>=4.0 [<em>SD</em>=2.3]). Biochemical assessment and surveys were conducted at enrollment, e-cigarette initiation (1 week later), and 1-week, 1-month, and 3-month post e-cigarette initiation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A subset (17 %) of participants did not achieve the minimum 75 % EMA adherence at Week 1. The remaining participants showed excellent adherence with the EMA protocol, with a consistently high response rate to audibly prompted mini-surveys during screening (93 %) and follow-up weeks (93 %, 93 %, and 92 %, respectively). No consistent trend emerged in comparing the two randomized groups, either on variables relevant to the public health impact of e-cigarette initiation (i.e., cigarettes/day, exposure to smoke, exposure to nicotine, motivation to quit smoking), or in e-cigarette use (i.e., bouts/day, puffs/bout), with average Cohen's <em>d</em> values across timepoints ranging from <em>d</em> = 0.02 for exposure to smoke to <em>d</em> = 0.06 for cigarettes per day.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Conducting EMA with adults who smoke daily and are initiating e-cigarette use appears feasible, with some caveats. Reactivity to EMA during e-cigarette initiation appears to be small or non-significant.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"38 3","pages":"Article 100247"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213616323000605","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives
This pilot study tested the feasibility of tracking e-cigarette initiation over three months using a burst-of-measurement approach and examined reactivity to the ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data capture technique in this context.
Methods
Adults who smoked daily and were interested in trying e-cigarette use received an e-cigarette starter kit and were randomized to complete EMA reports (n = 30) vs. not (n = 29). Participants (Mage=44.1 years [SD=12.6], 61.0 % male, 54.3 % White, 38.9 % Black/African American) smoked 13.0 cigarettes per day on average (SD=8.4) and reported mild-to-moderate nicotine dependence (MFTND=4.0 [SD=2.3]). Biochemical assessment and surveys were conducted at enrollment, e-cigarette initiation (1 week later), and 1-week, 1-month, and 3-month post e-cigarette initiation.
Results
A subset (17 %) of participants did not achieve the minimum 75 % EMA adherence at Week 1. The remaining participants showed excellent adherence with the EMA protocol, with a consistently high response rate to audibly prompted mini-surveys during screening (93 %) and follow-up weeks (93 %, 93 %, and 92 %, respectively). No consistent trend emerged in comparing the two randomized groups, either on variables relevant to the public health impact of e-cigarette initiation (i.e., cigarettes/day, exposure to smoke, exposure to nicotine, motivation to quit smoking), or in e-cigarette use (i.e., bouts/day, puffs/bout), with average Cohen's d values across timepoints ranging from d = 0.02 for exposure to smoke to d = 0.06 for cigarettes per day.
Conclusions
Conducting EMA with adults who smoke daily and are initiating e-cigarette use appears feasible, with some caveats. Reactivity to EMA during e-cigarette initiation appears to be small or non-significant.
背景和目标这项试点研究测试了在三个月内使用突发测量方法跟踪电子烟启动情况的可行性,并考察了在这种情况下对生态瞬间评估(EMA)数据捕获技术的反应。方法每天吸烟并有兴趣尝试使用电子烟的成年人收到一个电子烟启动工具包,并被随机分配完成 EMA 报告(n = 30)与不完成 EMA 报告(n = 29)。参与者(年龄=44.1岁[SD=12.6],61.0%为男性,54.3%为白人,38.9%为黑人/非裔美国人)平均每天吸烟13.0支(SD=8.4),并报告有轻度至中度尼古丁依赖(MFTND=4.0[SD=2.3])。在入组、开始使用电子烟(1 周后)、开始使用电子烟后 1 周、1 个月和 3 个月时进行了生化评估和调查。结果一部分参与者(17%)在第 1 周未达到最低 75% 的 EMA 依从性。其余参与者对 EMA 方案的依从性极佳,在筛查(93%)和随访周(分别为 93%、93% 和 92%)期间对声音提示迷你调查的回复率一直很高。在与电子烟对公共健康的影响相关的变量方面(即:香烟/天、烟雾暴露、尼古丁暴露、戒烟动机),或在电子烟使用方面(即:结论对每天吸烟并开始使用电子烟的成年人进行 EMA 似乎是可行的,但也有一些注意事项。在开始使用电子烟期间对 EMA 的反应似乎很小或不明显。
期刊介绍:
The European journal of psychiatry is a quarterly publication founded in 1986 and directed by Professor Seva until his death in 2004. It was originally intended to report “the scientific activity of European psychiatrists” and “to bring about a greater degree of communication” among them. However, “since scientific knowledge has no geographical or cultural boundaries, is open to contributions from all over the world”. These principles are maintained in the new stage of the journal, now expanded with the help of an American editor.