A 9-year retrospective cohort study of the monitoring and screening of childhood developmental delay in Thailand

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Child Care Health and Development Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1111/cch.13233
Vallop Thaineua, Samai Sirithongthaworn, Siripon Kanshana, Sirikul Isaranurak, Opart Karnkawinpong, Amporn Benjaponpitak, Suwanchai Wattanayingcharoen, Ekachai Piensrivachara, Pimwarat Srikummoon, Salinee Thumronglaohapun, Nawapon Nakharutai, Patrinee Traisathit, Duangkamol Tangviriyapaiboon
{"title":"A 9-year retrospective cohort study of the monitoring and screening of childhood developmental delay in Thailand","authors":"Vallop Thaineua,&nbsp;Samai Sirithongthaworn,&nbsp;Siripon Kanshana,&nbsp;Sirikul Isaranurak,&nbsp;Opart Karnkawinpong,&nbsp;Amporn Benjaponpitak,&nbsp;Suwanchai Wattanayingcharoen,&nbsp;Ekachai Piensrivachara,&nbsp;Pimwarat Srikummoon,&nbsp;Salinee Thumronglaohapun,&nbsp;Nawapon Nakharutai,&nbsp;Patrinee Traisathit,&nbsp;Duangkamol Tangviriyapaiboon","doi":"10.1111/cch.13233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Developmental delay in early childhood can have negative long-term cognitive and psychiatric sequelae, along with poor academic achievement, so early screening and surveillance are paramount. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of screening and surveillance on child developmental delay using the Developmental Surveillance and Promotion Manual (DSPM) and the Thai Early Developmental Assessment for Intervention (TEDA4I) for Thai children aged 0–5 years old.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data were obtained from the routine developmental screening for specific disorders at ages 9, 18, 30, 42 and 60 months conducted using DSPM and TEDA4I from 2013 to 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data, and the results are visualised graphically herein.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Only 56% of the children were screened for child developmental delay using DSPM. The proportion of children screened increased from &lt;1% in 2013 to 90% in 2021. Suspected developmental delay prevalence increased significantly from 3.91% in 2013–2015 to 10.00% in 2016–2018 and 26.48% in 2019–2021. Moreover, of the children with suspected developmental delay who received developmental stimulation within a month, only 87.9% returned for follow-up visits when they were evaluated again using TEDA4I to ascertain any abnormalities and specific areas of deficit. The overall proportion of children diagnosed with developmental delay was 1.29%. During the pandemic, the proportion of screening tests for child developmental delay at routine vaccination visits and follow-ups decreased but was still at least 80% in each region.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Since 1%–3% of children have suspected developmental delay, early detection is key to treating it as soon as possible. We anticipate that our findings will raise awareness in parents and caregivers about childhood developmental delay and lead to the implementation of early intervention and follow-up at the rural level in Thailand.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55262,"journal":{"name":"Child Care Health and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cch.13233","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Care Health and Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cch.13233","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Developmental delay in early childhood can have negative long-term cognitive and psychiatric sequelae, along with poor academic achievement, so early screening and surveillance are paramount. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of screening and surveillance on child developmental delay using the Developmental Surveillance and Promotion Manual (DSPM) and the Thai Early Developmental Assessment for Intervention (TEDA4I) for Thai children aged 0–5 years old.

Methods

Data were obtained from the routine developmental screening for specific disorders at ages 9, 18, 30, 42 and 60 months conducted using DSPM and TEDA4I from 2013 to 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data, and the results are visualised graphically herein.

Results

Only 56% of the children were screened for child developmental delay using DSPM. The proportion of children screened increased from <1% in 2013 to 90% in 2021. Suspected developmental delay prevalence increased significantly from 3.91% in 2013–2015 to 10.00% in 2016–2018 and 26.48% in 2019–2021. Moreover, of the children with suspected developmental delay who received developmental stimulation within a month, only 87.9% returned for follow-up visits when they were evaluated again using TEDA4I to ascertain any abnormalities and specific areas of deficit. The overall proportion of children diagnosed with developmental delay was 1.29%. During the pandemic, the proportion of screening tests for child developmental delay at routine vaccination visits and follow-ups decreased but was still at least 80% in each region.

Conclusions

Since 1%–3% of children have suspected developmental delay, early detection is key to treating it as soon as possible. We anticipate that our findings will raise awareness in parents and caregivers about childhood developmental delay and lead to the implementation of early intervention and follow-up at the rural level in Thailand.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泰国儿童发育迟缓监测和筛查的九年回顾性队列研究
背景 儿童早期发育迟缓会对认知和精神造成长期的负面影响,同时还会导致学习成绩低下,因此早期筛查和监测至关重要。本研究的目的是使用《发育监测和促进手册》(DSPM)和《泰国早期发育干预评估》(TEDA4I)评估筛查和监测对 0-5 岁泰国儿童发育迟缓的影响。 方法 数据来自 2013 年至 2021 年使用《发育监测与促进手册》和 TEDA4I 对 9、18、30、42 和 60 个月大的儿童进行的特定疾病常规发育筛查。数据采用描述性统计方法进行分析,结果以图表形式呈现。 结果 只有 56% 的儿童通过 DSPM 筛查出儿童发育迟缓。接受筛查的儿童比例从 2013 年的 1%增至 2021 年的 90%。疑似发育迟缓患病率从 2013-2015 年的 3.91% 显著增至 2016-2018 年的 10.00% 和 2019-2021 年的 26.48%。此外,在一个月内接受发育刺激的疑似发育迟缓儿童中,只有87.9%的儿童在使用TEDA4I再次评估以确定是否存在异常和具体的缺陷领域时进行了回访。被诊断为发育迟缓的儿童总比例为 1.29%。大流行期间,在常规疫苗接种访问和随访中进行儿童发育迟缓筛查的比例有所下降,但在每个地区仍至少达到 80%。 结论 由于有 1%-3%的儿童疑似发育迟缓,因此早期发现是尽快治疗的关键。我们希望我们的研究结果能提高家长和看护人员对儿童发育迟缓的认识,从而在泰国农村地区实施早期干预和随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
136
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Child: care, health and development is an international, peer-reviewed journal which publishes papers dealing with all aspects of the health and development of children and young people. We aim to attract quantitative and qualitative research papers relevant to people from all disciplines working in child health. We welcome studies which examine the effects of social and environmental factors on health and development as well as those dealing with clinical issues, the organization of services and health policy. We particularly encourage the submission of studies related to those who are disadvantaged by physical, developmental, emotional and social problems. The journal also aims to collate important research findings and to provide a forum for discussion of global child health issues.
期刊最新文献
Translation, Reliability and Development of a Calculator for the Brazilian Portuguese Version of the Family Empowerment Scale (FES) in Caregivers of Individuals With Cerebral Palsy Language Development of Japanese Children Raised in Institutional Care Early Childhood Education and Care Attendance and Its Association With Outdoor Play, Screen Time and Sleep Duration of Young Children: Findings From the CHAT Trial in Australia Beyond the First Child: Unveiling the Reasons Behind Stopping Childbearing in Iran Quality of Life in Children With Chronic Health Conditions and Its Contribution to Unmet Supportive Care Needs of Families
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1