Health service and medication costs associated with common mental disorders and subthreshold symptoms in women: Findings from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study in Australia.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-11 DOI:10.1177/00048674241229931
Mary Lou Chatterton, Jan Faller, Long Khanh-Dao Le, Lidia Engel, Lana J Williams, Julie A Pasco, Cathy Mihalopoulos
{"title":"Health service and medication costs associated with common mental disorders and subthreshold symptoms in women: Findings from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study in Australia.","authors":"Mary Lou Chatterton, Jan Faller, Long Khanh-Dao Le, Lidia Engel, Lana J Williams, Julie A Pasco, Cathy Mihalopoulos","doi":"10.1177/00048674241229931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This analysis estimated 2013 annual healthcare costs associated with the common mental disorders of mood and anxiety disorders and psychological symptoms within a representative sample of Australian women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the 15-year follow-up of women in the Geelong Osteoporosis Study were linked to 12-month Medicare Benefits Schedule and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme data. A Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Non-patient edition identified common mental disorders and the General Health Questionnaire 12 assessed psychological symptoms. Participants were categorised into mutually exclusive groups: (1) common mental disorder (past 12 months), (2) subthreshold (no common mental disorder and General Health Questionnaire 12 score ⩾4) or (3) no common mental disorder and General Health Questionnaire 12 score <4. Two-part and hurdle models estimated differences in service use, and adjusted generalised linear models estimated mean differences in costs between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to no common mental disorder, women with common mental disorders utilised more Medicare Benefits Schedule services (mean 26.9 vs 20.0, <i>p</i> < 0.001), had higher total Medicare Benefits Schedule cost ($1889 vs $1305, <i>p</i> < 0.01), received more Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme prescriptions (35.8 vs 20.6, <i>p</i> < 0.001), had higher total Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme cost ($1226 vs $740, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and had significantly higher annual out-of-pocket costs for Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme prescriptions ($249 vs $162, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Compared to no common mental disorder, subthreshold women were less likely to use any Medicare Benefits Schedule service (89.6% vs 97.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), but more likely to use mental health services (11.4% vs 2.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.01). The subthreshold group received more Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme prescriptions (mean 43.3 vs 20.6, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and incurred higher total Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme cost ($1268 vs $740, <i>p</i> < .05) compared to no common mental disorder.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Common mental disorders and subthreshold psychological symptoms place a substantial economic burden on Australian healthcare services and consumers.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"404-415"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11055409/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674241229931","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This analysis estimated 2013 annual healthcare costs associated with the common mental disorders of mood and anxiety disorders and psychological symptoms within a representative sample of Australian women.

Methods: Data from the 15-year follow-up of women in the Geelong Osteoporosis Study were linked to 12-month Medicare Benefits Schedule and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme data. A Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Non-patient edition identified common mental disorders and the General Health Questionnaire 12 assessed psychological symptoms. Participants were categorised into mutually exclusive groups: (1) common mental disorder (past 12 months), (2) subthreshold (no common mental disorder and General Health Questionnaire 12 score ⩾4) or (3) no common mental disorder and General Health Questionnaire 12 score <4. Two-part and hurdle models estimated differences in service use, and adjusted generalised linear models estimated mean differences in costs between groups.

Results: Compared to no common mental disorder, women with common mental disorders utilised more Medicare Benefits Schedule services (mean 26.9 vs 20.0, p < 0.001), had higher total Medicare Benefits Schedule cost ($1889 vs $1305, p < 0.01), received more Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme prescriptions (35.8 vs 20.6, p < 0.001), had higher total Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme cost ($1226 vs $740, p < 0.05) and had significantly higher annual out-of-pocket costs for Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme prescriptions ($249 vs $162, p < 0.001). Compared to no common mental disorder, subthreshold women were less likely to use any Medicare Benefits Schedule service (89.6% vs 97.0%, p < 0.01), but more likely to use mental health services (11.4% vs 2.9%, p < 0.01). The subthreshold group received more Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme prescriptions (mean 43.3 vs 20.6, p < 0.001) and incurred higher total Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme cost ($1268 vs $740, p < .05) compared to no common mental disorder.

Conclusions: Common mental disorders and subthreshold psychological symptoms place a substantial economic burden on Australian healthcare services and consumers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与女性常见精神障碍和阈下症状相关的医疗服务和药物成本:澳大利亚吉隆骨质疏松症研究的结果。
目的这项分析估算了具有代表性的澳大利亚女性样本中与情绪障碍、焦虑障碍和心理症状等常见精神疾病相关的 2013 年年度医疗成本:方法:将吉隆骨质疏松症研究(Geelong Osteoporosis Study)中妇女的 15 年随访数据与 12 个月的医疗保险福利表(Medicare Benefits Schedule)和药品福利计划(Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme)数据联系起来。精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版非患者版的结构化临床访谈确定了常见的精神疾病,第 12 号一般健康问卷评估了心理症状。参与者被分为相互排斥的几组:(1) 常见精神障碍(过去 12 个月)、(2) 低阈值(无常见精神障碍且一般健康问卷 12 得分⩾4)或 (3) 无常见精神障碍且一般健康问卷 12 得分 结果:与没有常见精神障碍的妇女相比,患有常见精神障碍的妇女使用了更多的医疗保险福利表服务(平均 26.9 对 20.0,p p p p p p p p p 结论:常见精神障碍和阈值以下心理症状给澳大利亚医疗保健服务和消费者带来了巨大的经济负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the official Journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP). The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is a monthly journal publishing original articles which describe research or report opinions of interest to psychiatrists. These contributions may be presented as original research, reviews, perspectives, commentaries and letters to the editor. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the leading psychiatry journal of the Asia-Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
Self-poisoning in young Australians: The impact of COVID-19 and recent trends following easing of restrictions. Letters to the Editor: Differential effects of access restriction to a highway bridge on suicide numbers by jumping. Extending the reach of involuntary treatment to substance use disorders: Is it 'compassionate' or coercive care? Policy implications of the 2020-22 Australian study of mental health and wellbeing. Glutamatergic neurotransmission in schizophrenia: A systematic review and quantitative synthesis of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies across schizophrenia spectrum disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1