Five-Year Safety and Effectiveness of Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Balloons Alone or With Provisional Bare Metal Stenting for Real-World Femoropopliteal Lesions: IN.PACT Global Study Subgroup Analysis.

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-13 DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013084
Gary M Ansel, Marianne Brodmann, Krishna J Rocha-Singh, Jeremiah S Menk, Thomas Zeller
{"title":"Five-Year Safety and Effectiveness of Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Balloons Alone or With Provisional Bare Metal Stenting for Real-World Femoropopliteal Lesions: IN.PACT Global Study Subgroup Analysis.","authors":"Gary M Ansel, Marianne Brodmann, Krishna J Rocha-Singh, Jeremiah S Menk, Thomas Zeller","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment of complex infra-inguinal disease with drug-coated balloons (DCBs) is associated with a significant number of patients undergoing provisional stenting to treat a suboptimal result. To determine the potential long-term impact of DCB treatment with provisional bare metal stenting in complex lesions in real-world patients, a post hoc analysis was performed on data from the IN.PACT Global Study (The IN.PACT Global Clinical Study for the Treatment of Comprehensive Superficial Femoral and/or Popliteal Artery Lesions Using the IN.PACT Admiral Drug-Eluting Balloon). Five-year outcomes were compared between participants who were stented after DCB treatment versus those treated with DCB alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The IN.PACT Global Study enrolled 1535 participants with intermittent claudication and/or ischemic rest pain caused by femoropopliteal lesions; 1397 patients were included in this subgroup analysis (353 stented and 1044 nonstented). Effectiveness was assessed as freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization through 60 months. The primary safety composite end point was defined as freedom from device- and procedure-related death through 30 days, and freedom from major target limb amputation and clinically driven target vessel revascularization through 60 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lesions in the stented group were longer (15.37 versus 10.98 cm; <i>P</i><0.001) and had more total occlusions (54.7% versus 28.6%; <i>P</i><0.001) compared with the nonstented group. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimated freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization was similar between groups (66.8% stented versus 70.0% nonstented group, log-rank <i>P</i>=0.22). The safety composite end point was achieved in 64.5% stented versus 68.2% nonstented participants (log-rank <i>P</i>=0.19) as estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. No significant difference was observed in the cumulative incidence of major adverse events (49.1% stented versus 45.0% nonstented; log-rank <i>P</i>=0.17), including all-cause death (19.6% stented versus 19.3% nonstented, log-rank <i>P</i>=0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this real-world study, revascularization of complex femoropopliteal artery lesions with DCB angioplasty alone or DCB followed by provisional bare metal stenting in certain lesions achieved comparable long-term safety and clinical effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01609296.</p>","PeriodicalId":10330,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10871603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013084","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The treatment of complex infra-inguinal disease with drug-coated balloons (DCBs) is associated with a significant number of patients undergoing provisional stenting to treat a suboptimal result. To determine the potential long-term impact of DCB treatment with provisional bare metal stenting in complex lesions in real-world patients, a post hoc analysis was performed on data from the IN.PACT Global Study (The IN.PACT Global Clinical Study for the Treatment of Comprehensive Superficial Femoral and/or Popliteal Artery Lesions Using the IN.PACT Admiral Drug-Eluting Balloon). Five-year outcomes were compared between participants who were stented after DCB treatment versus those treated with DCB alone.

Methods: The IN.PACT Global Study enrolled 1535 participants with intermittent claudication and/or ischemic rest pain caused by femoropopliteal lesions; 1397 patients were included in this subgroup analysis (353 stented and 1044 nonstented). Effectiveness was assessed as freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization through 60 months. The primary safety composite end point was defined as freedom from device- and procedure-related death through 30 days, and freedom from major target limb amputation and clinically driven target vessel revascularization through 60 months.

Results: Lesions in the stented group were longer (15.37 versus 10.98 cm; P<0.001) and had more total occlusions (54.7% versus 28.6%; P<0.001) compared with the nonstented group. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimated freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization was similar between groups (66.8% stented versus 70.0% nonstented group, log-rank P=0.22). The safety composite end point was achieved in 64.5% stented versus 68.2% nonstented participants (log-rank P=0.19) as estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. No significant difference was observed in the cumulative incidence of major adverse events (49.1% stented versus 45.0% nonstented; log-rank P=0.17), including all-cause death (19.6% stented versus 19.3% nonstented, log-rank P=0.99).

Conclusions: In this real-world study, revascularization of complex femoropopliteal artery lesions with DCB angioplasty alone or DCB followed by provisional bare metal stenting in certain lesions achieved comparable long-term safety and clinical effectiveness.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01609296.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
紫杉醇药物涂层球囊单独或与临时裸金属支架一起治疗真实世界股腘病变的五年安全性和有效性:IN.PACT全球研究亚组分析。
背景:使用药物涂层球囊(DCB)治疗复杂的腹股沟下疾病时,相当多的患者需要接受临时支架治疗,以获得不理想的治疗效果。为了确定DCB治疗与临时裸金属支架治疗复杂病变对实际患者的潜在长期影响,我们对IN.PACT全球研究(使用IN.PACT Admiral药物洗脱球囊治疗股浅动脉和/或腘动脉综合病变的IN.PACT全球临床研究)的数据进行了事后分析。方法:IN.PACT全球临床研究招募了在DCB治疗后植入支架的患者和仅使用DCB治疗的患者,并对两者的五年疗效进行了比较:IN.PACT全球研究共招募了1535名患有间歇性跛行和/或股骨腘窝病变引起的缺血性静息痛的参与者;1397名患者被纳入该亚组分析(353名接受支架治疗,1044名未接受支架治疗)。疗效以 60 个月内无临床驱动的靶病变血运重建为评估标准。主要安全性综合终点定义为:30 天内无器械和手术相关死亡,60 个月内无主要靶肢截肢和临床驱动的靶血管再通:支架组的病变更长(15.37 厘米对 10.98 厘米;PPP=0.22)。根据 Kaplan-Meier 法估算,64.5% 的支架植入者与 68.2% 的非支架植入者达到了安全复合终点(对数秩 P=0.19)。在主要不良事件的累积发生率方面(支架置入49.1%对非支架置入45.0%;对数秩P=0.17),包括全因死亡(支架置入19.6%对非支架置入19.3%,对数秩P=0.99),没有观察到明显差异:在这项真实世界的研究中,在某些病变中使用DCB血管成形术或DCB后使用临时裸金属支架对复杂的股腘动脉病变进行血管再通术,可获得相当的长期安全性和临床有效性:URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier:NCT01609296。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, an American Heart Association journal, focuses on interventional techniques pertaining to coronary artery disease, structural heart disease, and vascular disease, with priority placed on original research and on randomized trials and large registry studies. In addition, pharmacological, diagnostic, and pathophysiological aspects of interventional cardiology are given special attention in this online-only journal.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Coronary Revascularization Decisions: The Promising Role of Large Language Models as a Decision-Support Tool for Multidisciplinary Heart Team. Impact of a Chronic Total Occlusion on Outcomes After FFR-Guided PCI or Coronary Bypass Surgery: A FAME 3 Substudy. Large Language Models and Revascularization Decisions: The Newest Member of Your Multidisciplinary Heart Team? Relative Benefit of Dual Versus Single Antiplatelet Therapy Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation on Oral Anticoagulation According to Time After ACS and PCI: Insights From the AUGUSTUS Trial. Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Using Annular Reduction by Cinching With TEER in the Commissure (ARCTIC).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1