Development of Efficacious and Less Toxic Endodontic Irrigants from Biosurfactants of Bacterial Origin - A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Study.

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Contemporary Clinical Dentistry Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-19 DOI:10.4103/ccd.ccd_377_23
Manreet Parhar, Kanwalpreet Kaur Bhullar, Ridhima Arya
{"title":"Development of Efficacious and Less Toxic Endodontic Irrigants from Biosurfactants of Bacterial Origin - A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Study.","authors":"Manreet Parhar, Kanwalpreet Kaur Bhullar, Ridhima Arya","doi":"10.4103/ccd.ccd_377_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study compared the penetration depth and area of <i>Bacillus</i> <i>subtilis</i> and <i>Pseudomonas</i> <i>aeruginosa</i> biosurfactants inside the dentinal tubules against sodium hypochlorite at three levels (coronal, middle, and apical) under a confocal laser scanning microscope.</p><p><strong>Materials and methodology: </strong>Three experimental groups and one control were created using freshly extracted thirty-five maxillary central incisors; Group 1: <i>B.</i> <i>subtilis</i> biosurfactant; Group 2: <i>P.</i> <i>ae</i><i>ruginosa</i> biosurfactants; Group 3: sodium hypochlorite; and Group 4: distilled water. The experimental data were statistically analyzed by two-way analysis of variance, duly coupled with Tukey's <i>post hoc</i> test to draw concrete conclusions between paired comparisons, and <i>P</i> < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>P.</i> <i>aeruginosa</i> and <i>B.</i> <i>subtilis</i> biosurfactant showed the maximum mean penetration depth and area at all the level as compared to sodium hypochlorite.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Biosurfactants showed better results than sodium hypochlorite in reaching to higher penetration depth and area at all the three levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":10632,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Dentistry","volume":"14 4","pages":"282-288"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10855511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Clinical Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_377_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The study compared the penetration depth and area of Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biosurfactants inside the dentinal tubules against sodium hypochlorite at three levels (coronal, middle, and apical) under a confocal laser scanning microscope.

Materials and methodology: Three experimental groups and one control were created using freshly extracted thirty-five maxillary central incisors; Group 1: B. subtilis biosurfactant; Group 2: P. aeruginosa biosurfactants; Group 3: sodium hypochlorite; and Group 4: distilled water. The experimental data were statistically analyzed by two-way analysis of variance, duly coupled with Tukey's post hoc test to draw concrete conclusions between paired comparisons, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: P. aeruginosa and B. subtilis biosurfactant showed the maximum mean penetration depth and area at all the level as compared to sodium hypochlorite.

Conclusion: Biosurfactants showed better results than sodium hypochlorite in reaching to higher penetration depth and area at all the three levels.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用细菌来源的生物表面活性剂开发有效且毒性较低的牙髓冲洗剂--激光扫描共聚焦显微镜研究。
目的:本研究在共聚焦激光扫描显微镜下比较了枯草芽孢杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌生物表面活性剂在牙本质小管内三个层次(冠状层、中间层和根尖层)对次氯酸钠的渗透深度和面积:使用新鲜拔出的 35 颗上颌中切牙,分为三个实验组和一个对照组:第 3 组:次氯酸钠;第 4 组:蒸馏水。实验数据采用双因素方差分析和 Tukey 后检验进行统计分析,得出配对比较的具体结论,P < 0.05 为差异有统计学意义:结果:与次氯酸钠相比,铜绿假单胞菌和枯草杆菌生物表面活性剂在所有水平上都显示出最大的平均渗透深度和面积:生物表面活性剂比次氯酸钠的效果更好,在所有三个水平上都能达到更高的渗透深度和面积。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
Contemporary Clinical Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Contemporary Clinical Dentistry (CCD) (Print ISSN: 0976-237X, E-ISSN:0976- 2361) is peer-reviewed journal published on behalf of Maharishi Markandeshwar University and issues are published quarterly in the last week of March, June, September and December. The Journal publishes Original research papers, clinical studies, case series strictly of clinical interest. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of Dentistry i.e. Conservative dentistry and Endodontics, Dentofacial orthopedics and Orthodontics, Oral medicine and Radiology, Oral pathology, Oral surgery, Orodental diseases, Pediatric Dentistry, Periodontics, Clinical aspects of Public Health dentistry and Prosthodontics. Review articles are not accepted. Review, if published, will only be by invitation from eminent scholars and academicians of National and International repute in the field of Medical/Dental education.
期刊最新文献
In vitro Molecular Mechanisms of Anticancer Activity of Stevioside in Human Osteosarcoma Cell Lines (Sarcoma Osteogenic). A Comprehensive Approach to Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Management through Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding and Surgical Repair in a Neonate. A Single-Step Root Coverage Procedure Using Modified Bridge Flap Technique and De-epithelialized Gingival Unit Graft: A Prospective Clinical Study. Atypical Presentation and Surgical Management of Ectopic Mandibular Third Molar in Subcondylar Region: A Rare Case Report. Benign Fibrous Histiocytoma of Gingiva: A Rare Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1