Access to inflatable penile prosthesis surgery as indicated by distances traveled among US men with Medicare.

Abstract

Background: The significance of geographic barriers to receiving inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) treatment is uncertain according to the existing medical literature.

Aim: To describe the travel patterns of men with erectile dysfunction (ED) in the United States who underwent IPP surgery.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the 100% Medicare Standard Analytical Files. Men aged ≥65 years with an ED diagnosis who underwent IPP surgery between January 2016 and December 2021 were identified from the database. Federal Information Processing Series codes from the National Bureau of Economic Research's County Distance Database were used to determine geographic distances from patients' homes to the facilities at which surgery was performed.

Outcomes: Evaluations included the proportions of men who traveled outside their county of residence or state for IPP treatment and the average distances in miles traveled.

Results: Among 15 954 men with ED undergoing IPP treatment, 56.4% received care out of their county for IPP, at a mean distance of 125.6 miles (range, 3.8-4935.0). Although patients aged ≥80 years were less likely to travel outside their county as compared with men aged 65 to 69 years (48.1% vs 57.1%, P < .001), if they traveled, they were likely to travel farther (mean, 171.8 vs 117.7 miles; P < .001). South Dakota had the highest proportion of men traveling outside their county for IPP treatment (91.3%; mean, 514.2 miles), while Vermont had the highest proportion traveling outside their home state (73.7%).

Clinical implications: By unveiling disparities in access, this study will potentially lead to tailored interventions that enhance patient care and health outcomes.

Strengths and limitations: Strengths include the uniqueness in (1) evaluating the proportions of patients who travel out of their county of residence or home state for IPP treatment and (2) quantifying the average distances that patients traveled. An additional strength is the large sample size due to the retrospective design and database used. The analysis did not capture all Medicare enrollees; however, it did encompass all traditional Medicare enrollees, representing approximately half of all men in the US aged ≥65 years. Limitations include not being generalizable to entire population of the US, as the study examined only Medicare enrollees. In addition, the study period includes the pandemic, which could have affected travel patterns. Furthermore, the coding and accuracy of the data are limitations of using administrative claims data for research.

Conclusion: Study findings showed that many men with Medicare and ED traveled from their home geographic location for IPP treatment.