Topical Corticosteroid Phobia Among Women Affected With Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: Results From a Cross-sectional Survey.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-09 DOI:10.1097/LGT.0000000000000800
Alessandro Borghi, Maria Elena Flacco, Lucrezia Pacetti, Giulia Toni, Monica Corazza
{"title":"Topical Corticosteroid Phobia Among Women Affected With Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: Results From a Cross-sectional Survey.","authors":"Alessandro Borghi, Maria Elena Flacco, Lucrezia Pacetti, Giulia Toni, Monica Corazza","doi":"10.1097/LGT.0000000000000800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Topical corticosteroid (TC) phobia (TCP) is common in subjects affected with chronic inflammatory skin diseases who need prolonged corticosteroid treatments. The aim of this study was to assess TCP in women affected with vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This observational, cross-sectional study included adult patients with VLS who either started or were undergoing a TC treatment at our vulva unit between May 2022 and May 2023. All patients completed the self-administered TOPICOP questionnaire, which is validated for measuring concerns, worries, and beliefs about TC use. The scores obtained were analyzed in relation to demographic, history, and clinical data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of the 165 (92.1%, 66.5 ± 11.9 years) included patients who had previously undergone TC treatments, mostly for VLS; 81.8% of them had received information about TCs, mainly from dermatologists (86.7%). The median global TOPICOP score was 16.7% (interquartile range. 8.3-30.6), corresponding to a raw median value of 6.0 (interquartile range, 3.0-11.0). The median subscores for the 2 TOPICOP domains, namely, mistaken beliefs and worries about TCs, were equal to each other. At multivariate analysis, none of the collected variables showed a significant association with the degree of TCP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our VLS patients, TCP resulted rather low, probably because of the small skin area being treated and the high percentage of women who had already used TCs and who had received information about them from a dermatologist. This latter point suggests that adequate counseling could be a strong basis for greater awareness and serenity in the long-term use of TCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease","volume":" ","pages":"169-174"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000800","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Topical corticosteroid (TC) phobia (TCP) is common in subjects affected with chronic inflammatory skin diseases who need prolonged corticosteroid treatments. The aim of this study was to assess TCP in women affected with vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS).

Materials and methods: This observational, cross-sectional study included adult patients with VLS who either started or were undergoing a TC treatment at our vulva unit between May 2022 and May 2023. All patients completed the self-administered TOPICOP questionnaire, which is validated for measuring concerns, worries, and beliefs about TC use. The scores obtained were analyzed in relation to demographic, history, and clinical data.

Results: The majority of the 165 (92.1%, 66.5 ± 11.9 years) included patients who had previously undergone TC treatments, mostly for VLS; 81.8% of them had received information about TCs, mainly from dermatologists (86.7%). The median global TOPICOP score was 16.7% (interquartile range. 8.3-30.6), corresponding to a raw median value of 6.0 (interquartile range, 3.0-11.0). The median subscores for the 2 TOPICOP domains, namely, mistaken beliefs and worries about TCs, were equal to each other. At multivariate analysis, none of the collected variables showed a significant association with the degree of TCP.

Conclusions: In our VLS patients, TCP resulted rather low, probably because of the small skin area being treated and the high percentage of women who had already used TCs and who had received information about them from a dermatologist. This latter point suggests that adequate counseling could be a strong basis for greater awareness and serenity in the long-term use of TCs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外阴硬皮病妇女的外用皮质类固醇恐惧症:横断面调查结果。
目的:外用皮质类固醇(TC)恐惧症(TCP)常见于需要长期皮质类固醇治疗的慢性炎症性皮肤病患者。本研究的目的是评估外阴硬皮病(VLS)女性患者的外用皮质类固醇恐惧症:这项观察性横断面研究纳入了 2022 年 5 月至 2023 年 5 月期间在我院外阴科开始或正在接受 TC 治疗的 VLS 成年患者。所有患者都填写了自我管理的 TOPICOP 问卷,该问卷已通过验证,可用于测量对 TC 使用的顾虑、担忧和信念。我们结合人口统计学、病史和临床数据对所得分数进行了分析:165人中的大多数(92.1%,66.5±11.9岁)曾接受过TC治疗,其中大部分是VLS患者;81.8%的患者接受过有关TC的信息,主要来自皮肤科医生(86.7%)。总体 TOPICOP 评分的中位数为 16.7%(四分位数间距为 8.3-30.6),对应的原始中位值为 6.0(四分位数间距为 3.0-11.0)。两个 TOPICOP 领域(即错误信念和对 TC 的担忧)的中位数彼此相等。在多变量分析中,所收集的变量均未显示与 TCP 程度有显著关联:在我们的 VLS 患者中,TCP 的结果相当低,这可能是因为接受治疗的皮肤面积较小,而且已经使用过 TCs 并从皮肤科医生那里获得相关信息的女性比例较高。后一点表明,适当的咨询是提高长期使用 TC 的意识和安全性的坚实基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease is the source for the latest science about benign and malignant conditions of the cervix, vagina, vulva, and anus. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original research original research that addresses prevalence, causes, mechanisms, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of lower genital tract disease. We publish clinical guidelines, position papers, cost-effectiveness analyses, narrative reviews, and systematic reviews, including meta-analyses. We also publish papers about research and reporting methods, opinions about controversial medical issues. Of particular note, we encourage material in any of the above mentioned categories that is related to improving patient care, avoiding medical errors, and comparative effectiveness research. We encourage publication of evidence-based guidelines, diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms, and decision aids. Original research and reviews may be sub-classified according to topic: cervix and HPV, vulva and vagina, perianal and anal, basic science, and education and learning. The scope and readership of the journal extend to several disciplines: gynecology, internal medicine, family practice, dermatology, physical therapy, pathology, sociology, psychology, anthropology, sex therapy, and pharmacology. The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease highlights needs for future research, and enhances health care. The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease is the official journal of the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease, and the International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy, and sponsored by the Australian Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology and the Society of Canadian Colposcopists.
期刊最新文献
Predictors of Resolution and Recurrence of Anal High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions in People With HIV. Tiktok as a Source of Education and Misinformation in Lichen Sclerosus. Sexual Distress and Quality of Life in Women With Genital Erosive Lichen Planus-A Cross-sectional Study. Validation of the 2019 American Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Online Cervical Cancer Screening Program via 9 Large-Cohort Data of Chinese Women. The Distribution of Cervical Transformation Zone and Its Impact on Colposcopic Diagnosis: A Multicenter Study in China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1