Intraocular Straylight and Multifocal Soft Contact Lens Fit With a Myopia Control Approach.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1097/ICL.0000000000001069
Eric R Ritchey, Hannah R Gregory, Augustine N Nti, David A Berntsen
{"title":"Intraocular Straylight and Multifocal Soft Contact Lens Fit With a Myopia Control Approach.","authors":"Eric R Ritchey, Hannah R Gregory, Augustine N Nti, David A Berntsen","doi":"10.1097/ICL.0000000000001069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Center-distance multifocal contact lenses (MFCLs) are used to slow myopia progression. We examined the effect of two MFCLs on intraocular straylight values in myopic individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-five young myopic adults were enrolled and were fit with three contact lenses (Biofinity sphere, Biofinity Multifocal, and NaturalVue Multifocal) in a random order over two study visits. Pupil size (NeurOptics VIP-300, Laguna Hills, CA) and contact lens centration were measured. Right eye intraocular straylight measurements were collected (OCULUS C-Quant; Wetzlar, Germany) and compared with a spectacle trial lens. Log straylight (LogSL) values and straylight residuals were analyzed using repeated-measures analyses of variance with Tukey-corrected post hoc t -tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean participant age (±SD) was 24.1±1.5 years, and right eye spherical equivalent refractive error was -3.38±1.53 DS. There was no difference in mesopic pupil size between visits ( P =0.68) and no difference in contact lens centration between lenses ( P =0.99). LogSL values differed by lens type ( P =0.004). LogSL with the spectacle trial lens was significantly greater than with each contact lens type (all P <0.05), but there were no significant differences in LogSL between the three contact lenses (all P >0.05). There was no difference between the three contact lens designs for straylight residuals ( P =0.33).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Measured intraocular straylight for both MFCLs was not different than with a spherical soft contact lens. A significant increase in intraocular straylight with spectacle trial lens correction was observed compared with all contact lenses.</p>","PeriodicalId":50457,"journal":{"name":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"171-176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10963149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000001069","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Center-distance multifocal contact lenses (MFCLs) are used to slow myopia progression. We examined the effect of two MFCLs on intraocular straylight values in myopic individuals.

Methods: Twenty-five young myopic adults were enrolled and were fit with three contact lenses (Biofinity sphere, Biofinity Multifocal, and NaturalVue Multifocal) in a random order over two study visits. Pupil size (NeurOptics VIP-300, Laguna Hills, CA) and contact lens centration were measured. Right eye intraocular straylight measurements were collected (OCULUS C-Quant; Wetzlar, Germany) and compared with a spectacle trial lens. Log straylight (LogSL) values and straylight residuals were analyzed using repeated-measures analyses of variance with Tukey-corrected post hoc t -tests.

Results: The mean participant age (±SD) was 24.1±1.5 years, and right eye spherical equivalent refractive error was -3.38±1.53 DS. There was no difference in mesopic pupil size between visits ( P =0.68) and no difference in contact lens centration between lenses ( P =0.99). LogSL values differed by lens type ( P =0.004). LogSL with the spectacle trial lens was significantly greater than with each contact lens type (all P <0.05), but there were no significant differences in LogSL between the three contact lenses (all P >0.05). There was no difference between the three contact lens designs for straylight residuals ( P =0.33).

Conclusions: Measured intraocular straylight for both MFCLs was not different than with a spherical soft contact lens. A significant increase in intraocular straylight with spectacle trial lens correction was observed compared with all contact lenses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼内杂散光和多焦点软性隐形眼镜的配戴与近视控制方法。
目的:中心距多焦点隐形眼镜(MFCL)用于减缓近视的发展。我们研究了两种 MFCL 对近视患者眼内杂光值的影响:方法:我们招募了 25 名年轻的近视成年人,并在两次考察中以随机顺序为他们配戴了三种隐形眼镜(Biofinity 球面隐形眼镜、Biofinity 多焦点隐形眼镜和 NaturalVue 多焦点隐形眼镜)。对瞳孔大小(NeurOptics VIP-300,加利福尼亚州拉古纳山)和隐形眼镜中心度数进行了测量。收集右眼眼内杂光测量值(OCULUS C-Quant;德国,Wetzlar),并与眼镜试戴镜片进行比较。使用重复测量方差分析和 Tukey 校正后 t 检验分析对数杂散光(LogSL)值和杂散光残差:参与者的平均年龄(±SD)为 24.1±1.5 岁,右眼球面等效屈光度为-3.38±1.53 DS。各次检查的中焦瞳孔大小无差异(P=0.68),不同镜片的隐形眼镜中心无差异(P=0.99)。镜片类型不同,对数值也不同(P=0.004)。眼镜试戴镜片的对数值明显高于各种隐形眼镜(均为 P0.05)。三种隐形眼镜设计的杂散光残差没有差异(P=0.33):结论:两种 MFCL 的眼内杂光测量值与球面软性隐形眼镜没有差异。与所有隐形眼镜相比,眼镜试戴镜片矫正后的眼内杂光明显增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Eye & Contact Lens: Science and Clinical Practice is the official journal of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists (CLAO), an international educational association for anterior segment research and clinical practice of interest to ophthalmologists, optometrists, and other vision care providers and researchers. Focusing especially on contact lenses, it also covers dry eye disease, MGD, infections, toxicity of drops and contact lens care solutions, topography, cornea surgery and post-operative care, optics, refractive surgery and corneal stability (eg, UV cross-linking). Peer-reviewed and published six times annually, it is a highly respected scientific journal in its field.
期刊最新文献
Contact Lens Regulation: Where Have We Been, Where are We Going? Corneal Refractive Surgery Considerations in Patients With History of Orthokeratology. Evaluation of Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive Glue Application Outcomes in Corneal Thinning and Perforation. Spotlight on Amniotic Membrane Extract Eye Drops: A Review of the Literature. Corneal Clarity and Tomographic Patterns in Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome: A Severity-Based Investigation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1