Assessing the Impact of Stem Cell-based Therapy on Periodontal Health: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Studies.

Yu-Han Shao, Yi Song, Qiao-Li Feng, Yan Deng, Tao Tang
{"title":"Assessing the Impact of Stem Cell-based Therapy on Periodontal Health: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Studies.","authors":"Yu-Han Shao, Yi Song, Qiao-Li Feng, Yan Deng, Tao Tang","doi":"10.2174/011574888X294900240130095058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While clinical trials exploring stem cells for regenerating periodontal tissues have demonstrated positive results, there is a limited availability of systematic literature reviews on this subject. To gain a more comprehensive understanding of stem cell interventions in periodontal regeneration, this meta-analysis is undertaken to assess the beneficial effects of stem cells in human periodontal regeneration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>\"PubMed,\" \"Cochrane Library,\" \"Web of Science,\" \"Embase,\" \"Wanfang,\" and \"CNKI,\" were used to extract clinical studies related to the utilization of stem cells in repairing periodontal tissue defects. This search included studies published up until October 5, 2023. The inclusion criteria required the studies to compare the efficacy of stem cell-based therapy with stem cell-free therapy for regenerating periodontal tissues. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager software (version 5.4).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis synthesized findings from 15 selected studies investigating the impact of stem cell interventions on periodontal tissue regeneration. The \"stem cell\" group displayed a substantial reduction in clinical attachment level (CAL) compared to the \"control\" group within 3 to 12 months post-surgery. However, no significant differences in CAL gain were found between groups. Probing pocket depth (PPD) significantly decreased in the \"stem cell\" group compared to the \"control\" group, particularly for follow-up periods exceeding 6 months, and dental stem cell treatment exhibited notable improvements. Conversely, no significant differences were observed in PPD reduction. Gingival recession (GR) significantly decreased in the \"stem cell\" group compared to the \"control\" group at 3 to 12 months post-surgery. No significant differences were observed in GR reduction between groups. No significant differences were identified in cementoenamel junction-bone distance reduction, infrabony defect reduction, or bone mineral density increase between the two groups. Furthermore, no significant changes were observed in the gingival index, plaque index, or width of keratinized gingiva.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, while stem cell-based therapy offers promising prospects for periodontal defect treatment, there are notable limitations in the current body of research. Larger, multicenter, double-blind RCTs with robust methodologies are needed to provide more reliable evidence for stem cell-based intervention in periodontitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":93971,"journal":{"name":"Current stem cell research & therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current stem cell research & therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/011574888X294900240130095058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: While clinical trials exploring stem cells for regenerating periodontal tissues have demonstrated positive results, there is a limited availability of systematic literature reviews on this subject. To gain a more comprehensive understanding of stem cell interventions in periodontal regeneration, this meta-analysis is undertaken to assess the beneficial effects of stem cells in human periodontal regeneration.

Methods: "PubMed," "Cochrane Library," "Web of Science," "Embase," "Wanfang," and "CNKI," were used to extract clinical studies related to the utilization of stem cells in repairing periodontal tissue defects. This search included studies published up until October 5, 2023. The inclusion criteria required the studies to compare the efficacy of stem cell-based therapy with stem cell-free therapy for regenerating periodontal tissues. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager software (version 5.4).

Results: This meta-analysis synthesized findings from 15 selected studies investigating the impact of stem cell interventions on periodontal tissue regeneration. The "stem cell" group displayed a substantial reduction in clinical attachment level (CAL) compared to the "control" group within 3 to 12 months post-surgery. However, no significant differences in CAL gain were found between groups. Probing pocket depth (PPD) significantly decreased in the "stem cell" group compared to the "control" group, particularly for follow-up periods exceeding 6 months, and dental stem cell treatment exhibited notable improvements. Conversely, no significant differences were observed in PPD reduction. Gingival recession (GR) significantly decreased in the "stem cell" group compared to the "control" group at 3 to 12 months post-surgery. No significant differences were observed in GR reduction between groups. No significant differences were identified in cementoenamel junction-bone distance reduction, infrabony defect reduction, or bone mineral density increase between the two groups. Furthermore, no significant changes were observed in the gingival index, plaque index, or width of keratinized gingiva.

Conclusion: In conclusion, while stem cell-based therapy offers promising prospects for periodontal defect treatment, there are notable limitations in the current body of research. Larger, multicenter, double-blind RCTs with robust methodologies are needed to provide more reliable evidence for stem cell-based intervention in periodontitis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估干细胞疗法对牙周健康的影响:临床研究的元分析。
目的:虽然探索干细胞再生牙周组织的临床试验已取得积极成果,但有关这一主题的系统文献综述却十分有限。为了更全面地了解干细胞对牙周再生的干预,本荟萃分析旨在评估干细胞对人类牙周再生的有益影响:方法:使用 "PubMed"、"Cochrane Library"、"Web of Science"、"Embase"、"Wanfang "和 "CNKI "来提取与利用干细胞修复牙周组织缺损相关的临床研究。该搜索包括截至2023年10月5日发表的研究。纳入标准要求研究比较基于干细胞的疗法和不含干细胞的疗法对牙周组织再生的疗效。使用Review Manager软件(5.4版)进行荟萃分析:这项荟萃分析综合了15项选定研究的结果,这些研究调查了干细胞干预对牙周组织再生的影响。与 "对照 "组相比,"干细胞 "组在术后3至12个月内临床附着水平(CAL)大幅下降。不过,各组之间在CAL增加方面没有发现明显差异。与 "对照 "组相比,"干细胞 "组的探囊深度(PPD)明显下降,特别是在超过6个月的随访期间,牙科干细胞治疗有明显改善。相反,在 PPD 的减少方面没有观察到明显差异。与 "对照 "组相比,"干细胞 "组的牙龈退缩(GR)在术后3至12个月明显减少。各组之间在牙龈退缩方面无明显差异。两组在骨水泥釉交界处-骨距离减少、骨下缺损减少或骨矿物质密度增加方面没有发现明显差异。此外,在牙龈指数、牙菌斑指数或角化牙龈宽度方面也未观察到明显变化:总之,虽然干细胞疗法为牙周缺陷治疗提供了广阔的前景,但目前的研究还存在明显的局限性。要为干细胞干预牙周炎提供更可靠的证据,需要进行更大规模、多中心、双盲、方法可靠的临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of miR-98/IL-6/STAT3 on Autophagy and Apoptosis of Cardiac Stem Cells Under Hypoxic Conditions In vitro. Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell-derived Exosome Regulates Intestinal Type 2 Immunity. Kartogenin Induces Chondrogenesis in Cartilage Progenitor Cells and Attenuates Cell Hypertrophy in Marrow-Derived Stromal Cells. The Mechanisms of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis. The Role of Stem Cell Therapies in the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1